Dissecting the complexity of Cidanau watershed governance through payment environment services and non-payment environment services

• Autorzy: Budiarto Muh. S. , Widianingsih Ida , Muhtar Entang A. , Buchari Raden A. , Saksono Herie

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2023.147241

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this study is to examine the implementation of a combined scheme involving payment environment services (PES) and non-payment environment services (non-PES) in the management of the Cidanau River Basin. This study used exploratory research to analyse the structure and mechanism of PES and non-PES schemes for the governance system. The Cidanau Watershed governance is a pioneer in sustainable integrated water resources management in Indonesia and has persisted until the present time. The governance of the Cidanau Watershed is dynamic, resilient, and evolving in response to various changes in social and ecological systems. A bridging organisation like the Cidanau Watershed Communication Forum (Ind.: Forum Komunikasi DAS Cidanau - FKDC) requires legal standing to be visible and gain the trust of the public, especially when implementing a PES approach like the Cidanau River Basin, where service buyers utilise non-direct payment mechanisms. The challenging aspect of developing a PES scheme is empowering knowledge regarding the importance of soil and water preservation among upstream communities, particularly in developing countries like Indonesia, where upstream communities are predominantly composed of low-income farmers whose livelihoods depend on nature. The non-PES scheme represents the government’s mandatory responsibility, whereas the PES scheme presents public participation in active collaboration through the FKDC as an ad hoc institution. A combination of the non-PES and PES scheme approach can serve as a model and reference for similar river basin governance frameworks. Further research is needed regarding social networks and institutional development of sustainable watershed governance in the Cidanau River Basin.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Cidanau Watershed; Indonesia; non-PES scheme; PES; watershed governance

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 59
• Strony: 164--173
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 55 poz., mapa, rys.

Twórcy

autor

Budiarto Muh. S.

• Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Jl. Bukit Dago Utara No. 25, 40135, Bandung, Indonesia
• Regional Development Planning Agency, Jl. Syeh Nawawi Al Banteni No. 1, 42171, Serang City, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-5850

autor

Widianingsih Ida

• Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Center for Decentralisation and Participatory Development Research, Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-5236

autor

Muhtar Entang A.

• Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Jl. Bukit Dago Utara No. 25, 40135, Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-2443

autor

Buchari Raden A.

• Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Center for Decentralisation and Participatory Development Research, Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-1336

autor

Saksono Herie

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-5311

Bibliografia

• Amaruzaman, S., Rahadian N.P. and Leimona B. (2017) “Role of intermediaries in the Payment for Environmental Services Scheme: Lessons learnt in the Cidanau watershed, Indonesia,” in S. Namirembe et al. (eds.) Co-investment in ecosystem services: global lessons from payment and incentive schemes. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), pp. 1–15.
• Atisa, G., Bhat, M.G. and McClain, M.E. (2014) “Economic assessment of best management practices in the Mara River Basin: Toward implementing payment for watershed services,” Water Resources Management, 28(6), pp. 1751–1766. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0585-3.
• Bhatta, L.D. et al. (2014) “Payment for ecosystem services: Possible instrument for managing ecosystem services in Nepal,” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management, 10(4), pp. 289–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.973908.
• Bösch, M., Elsasser, P. and Wunder, S. (2019) “Why do payments for watershed services emerge? A cross-country analysis of adoption contexts,” World Development, 119, pp. 111–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.010.
• Brauman, K.A. (2015) “Hydrologic ecosystem services: linking ecohydrologic processes to human well-being in water research and watershed management,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(4), pp. 345–358. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1081.
• Brisbois, M.C. and Loë de, R.C. (2016) “State roles and motivations in collaborative approaches to water governance: A power theory-based analysis,” Geoforum, 74, pp. 202–212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.012.
• Brownson, K. et al. (2020) “Governance of Payments for ecosystem ecosystem services influences social and environmental outcomes in Costa Rica,” Ecological Economics, 174, 106659. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106659.
• Budiarto, M.S. et al. (2022) “Research landscape on watershed management in Indonesia: A bibliometric analysis,” Aliansi: Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional, Special Edition September 2022, pp. 386–394.
• Calvet-Mir, L. et al. (2015) “Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: A closer look at effectiveness and equity,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, pp. 150–162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001.
• Darmawan, A., Tsuyuki S. and Budi, P.L. (2005). Study on illegal cultivation extension in Rawa Danau Natural Reserve, Indonesia. The Japanese Forest Society Congress, 116, 3B35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11519/jfsc.116.0.231.0.
• Deng, M. et al. (2022) “Public willingness to pay watershed ecocompensation in China’s Taihu basin: A case study,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1066194.
• Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S. (2008) “Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues,” Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp. 663–674. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
• Ferreyra, C. and Beard, P. (2007) “Participatory evaluation of collaborative and integrated water management: Insights from the field,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), pp. 271–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601156532.
• FKDC (2018) Rencana Pengelolaan Rawa Danau [Lake swamp management plan]. Serang: Forum Komunikasi DAS Cidanau. [Unpublished].
• Fulazzaky, M.A. (2014). Challenges of integrated water resources management in Indonesia, Water, 6(7), pp. 2000–2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w6072000.
• Gleick, P.H. (1998) “Water in crisis: Paths to sustainable water use,” Ecological Applications, 8(3), pp. 571–579. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2641249
• Gunawan, B. et al. (2004) “Community dependency on forest resources in West Java, Indonesia: The need to re-involve local people in forest management,” Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 18(4), pp. 29–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1300/j091v18n04_02.
• Hooper, B.P. (2003) “Integrated water resources management and river basin governance,” Water Resources Update, 126, pp. 12–20.
• Jennings, G.R. (2012) “Qualitative research methods,” in L. Dwyer, A. Gill and N. Seetaram (eds.) Handbook of research methods in tourism: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 309–323. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001295
• Khairiah, R.N. et al. (2016) “Monitoring model of payment for environmental service (PES) implementation in Cidanau Watershed with stands density approach,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, 33, pp. 269–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.078.
• Koebele, E.A. (2015) “Assessing outputs, outcomes, and barriers in collaborative water Governance: A case study,” Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 155(1), pp. 63–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704x.2015.03196.x.
• Lapeyre, R., Pirard, R. and Leimona, B. (2015) “Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation?,” Land Use Policy, 46, pp. 283–291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.004.
• Loë de, R.C., Murray, D.P. and Simpson, H.C. (2015) “Farmer perspectives on collaborative approaches to governance for water,” Journal of Rural Studies, 42, pp. 191–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.10.005.
• Martin, D.M. et al. (2014) “A social-ecological framework to integrate multiple objectives for environmental flows management,” Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 153, pp. 49–58.
• Mbak, E. (2010). “Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) scheme implemented in the Cidanau Watershed, Indonesia,” in The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity. Available at: https://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Cidanau-Watershed-PES-scheme-Indonesia.pdf (Accessed: May 02, 2023).
• McIntyre-Mills, J. et al. (2022) “Ecocentric living: A way forward towards zero carbon: A conversation about indigenous law and leadership based on custodianship and praxis,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36(2), pp. 275–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-022-09604-0.
• Medema, W. et al. (2015) “Towards sustainable water governance: Examining water governance issues in Québec through the lens of multi-loop social learning,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, 40(4), pp. 373–391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1088403.
• Minnes, S. (2019) “Watershed governance or intake governance? Implications of Ontario’s Clean Water Act on collaborative watershed governance in rural areas,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, 44(4), pp. 401–422. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2019.1661791.
• Montenegro, L. and Hack, J. (2020) “A socio-ecological system analysis of multilevel water governance in Nicaragua,” Water, 12(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061676.
• Munawir and Vermeulen, S. (2007) Fair deals for watershed services in Indonesia. Developing markets for watershed services and improved livelihoods. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
• Nyongesa, J. et al. (2016) “Estimating farmers’ stated willingness to accept pay for ecosystem services: Case of Lake Naivasha watershed payment for ecosystem services scheme – Kenya,” Ecological Processes, 5(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0059-z.
• Okiria, E., Zaki, M.K. and Noda, K. (2021) “A review of payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the operation of agricultural water control structures ubiquitous?,” Sustainability, 13(22), 12624. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212624.
• Pan, X. et al. (2017). “Payments for ecosystem services in China: Policy, practice, and progress,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 158(1), pp. 200–208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2017.04.127.
• Parikesit et al. (2005) “Kebon tatangkalan: A disappearing agroforest in the Upper Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia,” Agroforestry Systems, 63(2), pp. 171–182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-1182-x.
• Perevochtchikova, M. et al. (2021) “A systematic review of scientific publications on the effects of payments for ecosystem services in Latin America, 2000–2020,” Ecosystem Services, 49, 101270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101270.
• Putera, P.B. et al. (2022) “Using convergent parallel mixed methods and datasets for science, technology, and innovation Policy dynamics research in Indonesia,” ASEAN Journal on Science & Technology for Development, 39(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.845.
• Ren, Y. et al. (2020) “Residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services and its influencing factors: A study of the Xin’an River basin,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122301.
• Salzman, J. et al. (2018) “The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services,” Nature Sustainability, 1(3), pp. 136–144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0.
• Sharma, M. et al. (2021) “Assessing payment for ecosystem services of Panchase Conservation Area: Exploring the potentialities,” Janapriya Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), pp. 37–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3126/jjis.v10i01.42584.
• Siagian, E.S. et al. (2019) “Public-private partnerships in solid waste management: arrangements in Indonesia,” The Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), pp. 56–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2019.1592845.
• Silva, A.R.C.A. and Ribeiro, F.L. (2013) “Payment for Watershed Services: It’s possible, but for which Conservation Policy on Fresh Water and Ecosystem Services?” in 10th International Symposium on Agriculture and the Environment abstracts, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA 23–27 May. West Lafayette: Purdue University.
• Song, B. et al. (2018) “A top-down framework for cross-regional payments for ecosystem services,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, pp. 238–245. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2018.01.203.
• Sulistyaningsih, T. et al. (2021) “Formulating sustainable watershed governance model: A meta-analysis of watershed governance,” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), pp. 90–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0041.
• Sururi, A. et al. (2022) “Housing policy for low-income communities in Indonesia and its reforms: An overview,” Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), pp. 158–174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.21.1.30151.
• UN Environment (2018) Progress on integrated water resources management. Global baseline for SDG 6 indicator 6.5.1: Degree of IWRM implementation. Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
• Vatn, A. (2010) “An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services,” Ecological Economics, 69(6), pp. 1245–1252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018.
• Wangdale, R.G. (2022) “Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES): Its potentials for the management of Cabuaan Watershed in Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines,” International Journal of Science and Management Studies, pp. 116–126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i2p113.
• Warriner, G.K. et al. (1996) “Public participation in watershed management: A comparative analysis,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, 21(3), pp. 253–273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj2103253.
• Widianingsih, I. et al. (2021) “Evolutionary study of watershed governance research: A bibliometric analysis. Science & Technology Libraries, 40(4), pp. 416–434. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1926401.
• Widianingsih, I., Riswanda, R. and Paskarina, C. (2020) “Governing water, engaging community: Indonesian water security roadmap,” Journal of Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. 5(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i2.9301.
• Wu, X. et al. (2019) “Pathways from payments for ecosystem services program to socioeconomic outcomes,” Ecosystem Services, 39, 101005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101005.
• Wulandari, C. et al. (2015) “Status and development of payment watershed services program in Taman Hutan Raya Register 19, Lampung Province,” International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 2(2), pp. 285–297. Available at: https://ijaer.in/uploads/ijaer_02__17.pdf (Accessed: April 13, 2023).
• Wunder, S. (2006) “Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?,” Ecology and Society, 11(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01831-110223.
• Yin, K.R. (2018) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th edn. Los Angeles: SAGE.
• Zeng, Q. et al. (2021) “Measuring the incremental impact of Payments for Watershed Services on water quality in a transboundary river basin in China,” Ecosystem Services, 51, 101355. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101355.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).