Clarifying a Circularity Phenomenon in a Circular Economy under the Notion of Potential

• Autorzy: Shevchenko Tetiana , Vavrek Roman , Danko Yuriy , Gubanova Olena , Chovancová Jana , Mykhailova Liubov

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2021.1.09

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Turning from linear to circular business model, from cradle-to-grave to cradle-to-cradle and from waste to wealth, the concept of circular economy (CE) has become an important tool to promote sustainable develop-ment as it combines economic, environmental and social benefits at a local as well as global scale. In the shift towards CE, examining the CE from the perspective of its potential is crucial for its wider and more effective implementation in the practice. The aim of the paper is to clarify a circularity phenomenon in closed-loop econ-omy under the notion of potential in part of (1) the structural elements, (2) underlying categories and (3) basal properties as a follow-up to the previous studies about managing the circularity potential. The study provides the theoretical framework for understanding circularity potential by developing the circularity potential categoriza-tion in order to get a comprehensive picture of what has been done in the past and where efforts are most need today to achieve a progress towards circularity in the future. The basal properties of circularity potential such as integrity, dynamism, territorial affiliation and different strategies compatibility were revealed and discussed for managing the circularity potential. The findings of the paper have ambition to contribute to new metrics devel-opment to measure the progress towards zero-waste and CE aimed at identification and monitoring all the possible forms of the circularity potential – opportunities, reserves, available resources, rather than the available resources only that were primarily considered in the past attempts at the operationalisation of circular economy.

PL

Przechodząc od modelu biznesowego liniowego do cyrkularnego, od kołyski do grobu do od kołyski do kołyski i od odpadów do bogactwa, koncepcja gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (CE) stała się ważnym narzędziem promowania zrównoważonego rozwoju, ponieważ łączy w sobie ekonomię, korzyści środowiskowe i społeczne w skali lokalnej i globalnej. W przejściu na CE, zbadanie CE z perspektywy jej potencjału jest kluczowe dla jej szerszego i efektywniejszego wdrożenia w praktyce. Celem artykułu jest wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału w części (1) elementów strukturalnych, (2) podstawowych kategorii i (3) podstawowych właściwości, co stanowi kontynuację poprzednich badań dotyczących zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Badanie ukazuje ramy teoretyczne potencjału obiegu zamkniętego poprzez opracowanie kategoryzacji potencjału obiegu zamkniętego w celu uzyskania komplek-sowego obrazu tego, co zostało zrobione w przeszłości i czego należy dokonać teraz, aby osiągnąć postęp w kierunku obiegu zamkniętego w przyszłości. Podstawowe właściwości potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, takie jak integralność, dynamizm, przynależność terytorialna i zgodność różnych strategii, zostały omówione w celu zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Wnioski zawarte w artykule prowadzą w kierunku opracowania nowych mierników do pomiaru postępu w kierunku zero-waste i CE, których celem jest identyfikacja i monitorowanie wszystkich możliwych form potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, a więc: możliwości, rezerwy, dostępne zasoby, a nie jedynie dostępne zasoby, które były brane pod uwagę przede wszystkim w poprzednich próbach operacjonalizacji gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

circular economy; circularity potential; zero waste; reuse potential; recycling

PL

gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym; potencjał obiegu zamkniętego; potencjał ponownego wykorzystania; zero waste; recykling

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 1
• Strony: 79--89
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Shevchenko Tetiana

• Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy, Ukraine

autor

Vavrek Roman

• VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava; Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Czechia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9434

autor

Danko Yuriy

• Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy, Ukraine

autor

Gubanova Olena

• Odessa State Environmental University; Lvivska 15, 65016 Odessa, Ukraine

autor

Chovancová Jana

• University of Prešov; Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov, Slovak Republic

autor

Mykhailova Liubov

• Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. ALLWOOD J.M., CULLEN J.M., CARRUTH M.A., 2012, Sustainable materials: With both eyes open, UIT Cambridge Ltd, Cambridge.
• 2. BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 603-614.
• 3. BOCKEN N. M. P., OLIVETTI E. A., CULLEN J. M., POTTING J., LIFSET R., 2017, Taking the Circularity to the Next Level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 476-482.
• 4. BOCKEN N. M. P., PAUW I., BAKKER C., GRINTEN B., 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, in: Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, p. 308-320.
• 5. BOCKEN N. M. P., SHORT S. W., RANA P., EVANS S., 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, p. 42–56.
• 6. BRAUNGART M., MCDONOUGH W., BOLLINGER A., 2007, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), p. 1337-1348.
• 7. BRIDGENS B., POWELL M., FARMER G., WALSH C., REED E., ROYAPOOR M., GOSLING P., HALL J., 2017, Framework for Implementing the Principles of the Circular Economy in Organizations–Guide, The British Standards Institution, London.
• 8. CIRCULAR ACADEMY, 2017, Circular Economy: Some Definitions, http://www.circular.academy/circular-economy-some-definitions/ (10.11.2019).
• 9. COX J., GRITH S., GIORGI, S., KING G., 2013, Consumer understanding of product lifetimes, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, p. 21-29.
• 10. DEN HOLLANDER M.C., BAKKER C. A., HULTINK E. J., 2017, Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 517-525.
• 11. Decision No. 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386&fro m =EN (10.11.2019).
• 12. DOMENECH T., BLEISCHWITZ R., DORANOVA A., PANAYOTOPOULOS D., ROMAN R., 2019, Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, p. 76– 98.
• 13. ELIA V., GNONI M. G., TORNESE F., 2016, Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), p. 2741-2751.
• 14. ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION AND GRANTA, 2015, Circularity indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
• 15. ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013a, Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
• 16. ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013b, Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumers goods sector, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
• 17. ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2014, Towards the circular economy. Accelerating the scaleup across supply chains, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
• 18. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2015, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (15.10.2019).
• 19. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2018, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid =1516265440535&uri=COM:2018:28:FIN (10.11.2019).
• 20. FRANKLIN-JOHNSON E., FIGGE F., CANNING L., 2016, Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, p. 589-598.
• 21. GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N., HULTINK E., 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, p. 757-768.
• 22. GLADYSHEV N. G., 2013, Scientific basics of recycling in techno-natural waste management clusters, Samara University, Samara.
• 23. GUBANOVA E. R., 2009, The mechanism of economic and environmental incentives for the use of secondary resources, OSEU, Odessa.
• 24. JAWAHIR I. S., BRADLEY R., 2016, Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing, in: Procedia CIRP, 40, p. 103-108.
• 25. KAUTISH P., PAUL J., SHARMA R., 2019, The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, p. 1425-1436.
• 26. KOMAR I., 1975, Rational use of natural resources and resource cycles, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.
• 27. KRONENBERG J., WINKLER R., 2009, Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial byproducts, in: Ecological Economics, 68(12), p. 3026- 3033.
• 28. MONT O., PLEPYS A., WHALEN K., NUBHOLZ J. L. K., 2017, Business model innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and barriers for the Swedish industry – the voice of REES companies, Mistra REES, Linkoping.
• 29. MONT O., HEISKANEN E-K., 2015, Breaking the stalemate of sustainable consumption with industrial ecology and a circular economy, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, Reisch L. and Thøgersen J., Edward Edgar, Cheltenham, p. 33- 49.
• 30. MURRAY A., SKENE K. HAYNES K., 2015, The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), p. 369-380.
• 31. NETO J. Q. F., BLOEMHOF J., CORBETT C., 2016, Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 171, p. 371-380.
• 32. PARK H. J., LIN L. M., 2018, Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products, in: Journal of Business Research, (in press).
• 33. PARK J. Y., CHERTOW M. R., 2014, Establishing and testing the ‘reuse potential’ indicator for managing wastes as resources, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 137, p. 45-53.
• 34. PAULIUK S., 2018, Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, p. 81-92.
• 35. PETRUSHENKO M., SHEVCHENKO H., 2013, Management of ecological-economical conflicts within the framework of the theory of optimal mechanisms for resource distribution, in: Actual Problems of Economics, 141(3), p. 186-192.
• 36. PIERONI M., MCALOONE T., PIGOSSO D., 2019, Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, p. 98-216.
• 37. PISCICELLI L., LUDDEN G. D. S., COOPER T., 2018, What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-topeer goods-sharing platforms, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, p. 4580-4591.
• 38. POTTING J., KROEZE C., 2010, Cradle to cradle: Old wine or new spirits?, in: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(2), p. 315-317.
• 39. PROKOPENKO O.V., KYSLY V.M., SHEVCHENKO H.M., 2014, Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions, in: Economic Annals-XXI, 7– 8(1), p. 40-43.
• 40. RASHID A., ASIF F.M.A., KRAJNIK P., NICOLESCU C.M., 2013, Resource Conservative Manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, p. 166-177.
• 41. SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2017, Management of material cyclicity potential: example of electrical and electronic products, in: Research in Design Series, 9, p. 377-381.
• 42. SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2020, Management of material and product circularity potential as an approach to operationalise circular economy, in: Progress in Industrial Ecology An International Journal, 14(1), p. 30-57.
• 43. SKENE K. R., 2017, Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work, Sustainability Science, 13(2), p. 479-492.
• 44. STAHEL W., 2010, The Performance Economy, Palgrave-MacMillan, London.
• 45. VELIS C. A, BRUNNER P. H., 2013, Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality, Waste Management and Research, 31(6), p. 539-540.
• 46. WEELDEN E., MUGGE R., BAKKER C., 2016, Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, p. 743-754.
• 47. WEBSTE K., 2015, The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight.
• 48. ZENG X., LI J., SINGH N., 2014, Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review, in: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), p. 1129-1165.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).