Usability rating methods of e-navigation systems

• Autorzy: Muczyński B. , Zalewski P.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Metody oceny użyteczności systemów e-nawigacji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The framework of usability testing of e-navigation equipment based on ECDIS example has been presented in the paper. By incorporating the eye tracking techniques into the procedure it was possible to measure visual attention distribution and cognitive workload. Such usability rating methods must be developed to ensure that the seafarers are able to successfully perform primary operations of systems upgraded with e-navigation functions, regardless of the type and specifications of the system and users’ knowledge and experience with the system.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono metodologię testów użyteczności sprzętu e-nawigacyjnego na przykładzie systemu ECDIS. Uwzględnienie technik okulograficznych w ramach zalecanych testów umożliwiło pomiar podziału uwagi i obciążenia poznawczego użytkowników ocenianego sprzętu. Tego rodzaju techniki muszą być rozwijane, aby zapewnić wykonywanie przez nawigatorów podstawowych operacji z udziałem systemów e-nawigacji niezależnie od ich doświadczenia z danym typem sprzętu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ship; navigation; system

• Wydawca: Instytut Naukowo-Wydawniczy "TTS" Sp. z o.o
• Czasopismo: TTS Technika Transportu Szynowego
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: R. 22, nr 12
• Strony: 2754--2758
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Muczyński B.

• Akademia Morska w Szczecinie, Wydział Nawigacyjny, 70-500 Szczecin, ul. Wały Chrobrego 1-2

autor

Zalewski P.

• Akademia Morska w Szczecinie, Wydział Nawigacyjny, 70-500 Szczecin, ul. Wały Chrobrego 1-2

Bibliografia

• 1. Ehmke, C., Wilson, S., Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data in Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but not as we know it - Volume 1 (BCS-HCI '07), Vol. 1. British Computer Society, 2007, Swinton, UK, pp. 119-128.
• 2. Endsley, M. R., Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON), pp. 789–795. New York: IEEE, 1988.
• 3. Endsley, M. R., Situation Awareness Oriented Design, In Lee, J. D. and Kirlik, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
• 4. Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X. P., Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 631–645, Oct. 1999.
• 5. Goldberg, J.H., Stimson, M.J., Lewenstein, M. Scott, N. & Wichansky, A.M., Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium 2002. 51-58. New York, ACM.
• 6. Hart, S. G., NASA – Task Load Index (NASA–TLX) 20 Years Later, NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, 2006.
• 7. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson R., Dewhurst R., Jarodzka H., and van de Weijer J., Eye tracking: A compre-hensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press, Inc., 2011.
• 8. IMO MSC.1/Circ.1512, Guideline on Software Quality Assurance and Human-Centred Design for e-navigation, IMO, London, 2015.
• 9. IMO MSC.232(82), Revised ECDIS Performance Standards, IMO, London, 2006.
• 10. IMO SOLAS, International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended, Consolidated Edition, IMO, London, 2014.
• 11. ISO 9421-110:2006, Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 110: Dialogue principles, ISO, 2009.
• 12. ISO/TR 16982:2002, Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Usability methods supporting human-centred design, ISO, 2002.
• 13. Jacob R. J. K. and Karn K. S., Commentary on Section 4. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises., in The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, Elsevier, 2003, pp. 573–605
• 14. Lützhöft, M., Dukic, T., Show me where you look and I'll tell you if you're safe: Eye tracking of maritime watchkeepers. Proceedings of the 39th Nordic Ergonomics Society Conference, 2007, Lysekil, Sweden
• 15. Muczyński B., Gucma M., Bilewski M., Zalewski P., Using eye tracking data for evaluation and improvement of training process in ship’s navigational bridge simulator. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, 33(105), 2013, 75–78.
• 16. NASA, NASA Task Load Index (TLX) v. 1.0 Manual, NASA, NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, 1986.
• 17. Papachristos, D., Koutsabasis, P., & Nikitakos, N., Usability evaluation at the ship’s bridge: A multi-method approach. 4th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics., 2012, Athens, Greece.
• 18. Strandvall T., Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research, in Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009, vol. 5727, T. Gross, J. Gulliksen, P. Kotzé, L. Oestreicher, P. Palanque, R. Prates, and M. Winckler, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 936–937.
• 19. Zalewski P., Tomczak A., Gralak R., Simulation Analysis of ECDIS’ Route Exchange Functionality Impact on Navigation Safety, The European Navigation Conference 2012, Gdańsk, 25-27.04.2012, Annual of Navigation 19/2012/part 2, Gdynia, 2012.