Low-Cost Dynamic Constraint Checking for the JVM

• Autorzy: Grzanek K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/jacsm-2016-0008

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Using formal methods for software verification slowly becomes a standard in the industry. Overall it is a good idea to integrate as many checks as possible with the programming language. This is a major cause of the apparent success of strong typing in software, either performed on the compile time or dynamically, on runtime. Unfortunately, only some of the properties of software may be expressed in the type system of event the most sophisticated programming languages. Many of them must be performed dynamically. This paper presents a flexible library for the dynamically typed, functional programming language running in the JVM environment. This library offers its users a close to zero run-time overhead and strong mathematical background in category theory.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

formal software verification; software quality; dynamic type-checking; functional programming; category theory; Clojure

• Wydawca: Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Łodzi
• Czasopismo: Journal of Applied Computer Science Methods
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 8 No. 2
• Strony: 115--136
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Grzanek K.

• IT Institute, University of Social Sciences 9 Sienkiewicza St., 90-113 Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Thomas M., 2016, How Can Software Be So Hard?, Gresham College Lecture, Feb. 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRVz1iqgKU
• 2. Thomas M., 2015, Should We Trust Computers, Gresham College Lecture, Oct. 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SZfjvlbpMw
• 3. Pierce B.C., 2002, Types and Programming Languages, 1st Edition, MIT Press, ISBN-10: 0262162091, ISBN-13: 978-0262162098
• 4. Pierce B.C., 2004, Advanced Topics in Types and Programming Languages, MIT Press, ISBN-10: 0262162288, ISBN-13: 978-0262162289
• 5. Lamport L., 2002, Specifying Systems, The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers, Addison Wesley, ISBN: 0-321-14306-X
• 6. Lamport L., Paulson L.L., 1999, Should Your Specification Language Be Typed?, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 502-526
• 7. Emerick Ch., Carper B., Grand Ch., 2012, Clojure Programming, O’Reilly Media Inc., ISBN: 978-1-449-39470-7
• 8. Fogus M., Houser Ch., 2014, The Joy of Clojure, Manning Publications; 2 edition, ISBN-10: 1617291412, ISBN-13: 978-1617291418
• 9. Bird R., Wadler R., 1988, Introduction to Functional Programming. Series in Computer Science (Editor: C.A.R. Hoare), Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd
• 10. Awodey S., 2010, Category Theory, Second Edition, Oxford University Press
• 11. Grzanek K., 2012, Prerequisites for Effective Requirements Management, Journal of Applied Computer Science Methods, Vol. 4, No 1, pp. 21-28
• 12. Grzanek K., 2017, ch GitHub Repository, https://github.com/kongra/ch
• 13. Grzanek K., 2017, ch Clojars Page, https://clojars.org/kongra/ch
• 14. Grzanek K., 2017, prelude GitHub Repository, https://github.com/kongra/prelude
• 15. Grzanek K., 2017, prelude Clojars Page, https://clojars.org/kongra/prelude
• 16. Grzanek K., 2017, aptell GitHub Repository, https://github.com/kongra/aptell
• 17. Clojure Team, 2017, clojure.spec Rationale, https://clojure.org/about/spec
• 18. Clojure Team, 2017, clojure.spec Guide, https://clojure.org/guides/spec
• 19. Plumatic, 2017, prismatic/schema GitHub Repository, https://github.com/ plumatic/schema
• 20. Clojure Team, 2017, clojure/core.typed GitHub Repository, https://github.com/ clojure/core.typed
• 21. CircleCI, 2015, Why we’re no longer using core.typed, https://circleci.com/blog/ why-were-no-longer-using-core-typed/
• 22. Hacker News, 2015, Why were no longer using core.typed - discussion, https:// news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10271149