Cone penetration test in assessment of soil stiffness

• Autorzy: Tschuschke W. , Kumor M. K. , Walczak M. , Tschuschke M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7306/gq.1188

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents proposals for the assessment of subsoil stiffness based on results of the seismic cone penetration test. Correlations between penetration parameters and constrained modulus were determined for three genetically different groups of cohesive soils. For the analyzed soil material quantitative estimation was also conducted for the parameter, which determines the relationship between the constrained modulus and initial shear modulus. A marked trend was shown for this parameter with the soil behavior type index used in the classification of soils in the cone penetration test.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soil stiffness; SCPTU; cohesive soils

• Wydawca: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Geological Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 59, No. 2
• Strony: 419--425
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Tschuschke W.

• University of Life Sciences, Department of Geotechnics, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland

autor

Kumor M. K.

• University of Technology and Life Sciences, Department of Geotechnics, Kordeckiego 20, 85-225 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Walczak M.

• University of Life Sciences, Department of Geotechnics, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland

autor

Tschuschke M.

• Consoil Project Ltd., Kunickiego 19, 61-418 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Arroyo, M., 2013. Geotechnical profiling and “in-situ” measurement of soil stiffness. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, 4:425-434. Taylor& Francis Group, London.
• 2. Atkinson, J.H., 2000. Noni i near soil stiffness in rou-ine design. Geotechnique, 50: 485-508.
• 3. Burns, S.E., Mayne, P.W., 2002. Interpretation of seismic piezocone results for the evaluation of hydraulic conductivity in clays. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 25: 333-340.
• 4. Jamiolkowski, M., 2012. Role of geophysical testing in geotechnical site characterization. Victor de Mello Lecture, Lis- bon, April 2012, Portuguese-Brazilian Geotechnical Congress, Soils and Rocks, 35: 1-21.
• 5. Jefferies, M.G., Davies, M.P., 1993. Use of CPTu to Estimate Equivalent SPT N60. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 16: 458-468.
• 6. Kim, D.S., Youn, J.U., Park, H.J., 2013. Applications of shear wave velocity on various geotechnical problems. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, 4: 661-673.
• 7. Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K, Powell, J.J.M., 1997. Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
• 8. Mayne, P.W., 2006. In-Situ Test Calibrations for Evaluating Soil Parameters. Overview Paper on In-Situ Testing, Singapore Workshop, Nov.-Dec. 01st, 2006: 1-56.
• 9. Mayne, P.W., 2007. Cone Penetration Testing. A Synthesis of Highway Practice. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007, NCHRP, 368: 117.
• 10. Mayne, P.W., Puzrin, A.M., Elhakim, A.F., 2003. Field characterization of small- to high-strain behavior of clays. Soil and Rock America, Proceedings, 12th Pan Am Conference, Verlag Gluckauf, Essen, 1: 307-313.
• 11. Robertson, P.K., 2001. Sixty Years of the CPT - How far have we come? Proceedings, International Conference on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, May 21--24, 2001: 1-16.
• 12. Robertson, P.K., 2009. CPT interpretation - a unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46: 1-19.
• 13. Sikora, Z., 2006. Sondowanie statyczne (in Polish). Metody i zastosowanie w geoinżynierii. Wydawnictwa Naukowo- Techniczne, Warszawa.
• 14. Tschuschke, W., Kmiecik, G., Mikos, A., 2013. Profiling in mine tailings based on CPTU and SDMT. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, 4: 1701-1706. Taylor & Francis Group, London.