Kinematics between the Adriatic and the Eurasian plate interior: further constraints from CEGRN and local space geodetic data

• Autorzy: Grenerczy G.
• Konferencja: Geodetic and Geodynamic Programmes of the CEI (Central European Initiative) (6-11.04.2003; Nice, France)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Within the EU 4th framework project CERGOP, later with the coordination or the CEGRN (Central European GPS Geodynamic Reference Network Consortium), and now as a EU 5th framework program the geodynamic research in Central Europe has been continued over a decade. The results from the latest space geodetic measurements have now been included in the combined and also in individual velocity solutions. After the 2001 campaign nearly twice as many sites have velocity estimates than before the extension or the network. The Adriatic region, the key player in shaping the tectonics of Central Europe, has several new stations with velocities on both sides of the microplate that further constrain its present motion. Some new permanent and epoch sites also complement the network in the Alpine-Pannonian-Carpathian system. This paper provides a status report on the compilation or the latest velocity field or the region. As a first step in modeling the diffuse deformation in the central part or the continental collision zone or Eurasia and Africa, an interpolated continuous velocity field was compiled and analyzed based on the combination or all available intraplate velocity solutions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GPS system; satellite geodesy

PL

GPS system; geodezja satelitarna

• Wydawca: Wydział Geodezji i Kartografii Politechniki Warszawskiej
• Czasopismo: Reports on Geodesy
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: z. 1/64
• Strony: 65--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., schem., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Grenerczy G.

• Satellite Geodetic Observatory, FÖMI, Budapest, Hungary

Bibliografia

• 1. Altiner, Y., Colic, K., Marjanovic, M., Medic, Z., Medved, M., Miskovic, D., Rasic, L, Pribicevic, B., Seeger, H., Szabó, M., Is the Adriatic Sea a Promontory or Exists as an Independent Microplate? Reports on Geodesy No5(46) pp. 149-157, 1999.
• 2. Baran, L., w., Busics, I., Cacon, S., Dobrzycka, M., Zablotsky, F., Status of subregional GPS geodynamics project GEODUC, Proceedings of the 1st Turkish International Symp. on Deformations, Istambul, 1994.
• 3. Becker, M., E. Cristea, M. Figurski, L. Gerhatova, G. Grenerczy, J. Hefty, A. Kenyeres, T. Liwosz, G. Stangl 2002. Central European intraplate velocitiesfrom CEGRN campaigns, Reports on Geodesy. No I (61) pp. 83-91, 2002.
• 4. Fejes, I., T. Borza, I. Busies, and A. Kenyeres, Realization of the Hungarian Geodynamic GPS Reference Network., J. Geodyn., 18, 145-152, 1993a.
• 5. Gerner P., G. Bada, P. Dövényi, B. Müller, M. C. Onescu, S. Cloetingh, and F. Horváth, Recent tectonic stress and crustal deformation in and around the Pannonian basin: Data and models, in The Mediterranean Basins: Tertiary Extension Within the Alpine Orogen, edited by B. Durand, L. Jolivet, F. Horváth, and M. Séranne, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ., 156, 269-294, 1999.
• 6. Gibowitz, S.J., B. Guterch, H. Lewandowska-Marciniak, and L., Wysokinski, Scismicity induced by surface mining: The Belchatow, Poland earthquake of 29. November 1980, Acta Geophys. Pol. 30, 193-219, 1982.
• 7. Grenerczy, Gy., Towards a dense intraplate velocity map for Central Europe, Reports on Geodesy No. 1 (61), pp. 27-36, 2002.
• 8. Grenerczy, Gy., Present-day tectonics of the Pannonian basin and its surroundings inferred from space geodesy, Ph.D. dissertation, Loránd Eötvös University., Budapest. Hungary, p.1-122, 2000. www.elte.hu/public/recent.
• 9. Grenerczy, Gy., 2002. Tectonic processes in the Eurasian-African plate boundary zone revealed by space geodesy, "Plate Boundary Zones" AGU Monograph, edited by S. Stein, J. T. Freymueller, Geodynamics Series Volume 30, pp. 67-86, ISBN# 0-87590-532-3.
• 10. Hefty, J., 2001 Possibilities of improving the velocity estimates from CERGO campaigns, Proceedings of the EGS General Assembly 25-30 March 2001, Nice, France, Reports on Geodesy Vol. No. 2 (57) pp. 71-81.
• 11. Priam, S.:1995 National Report of Slovakia. Report on Geodesy No 1(14) 1995.
• 12. Schenk, V., Z. Schenková and P. Kottnauer, Geodynamical pattern of the Bohemian Massif, in The Bohemian Massif, edited by P. Vyskočil, IGGA WUT Spec. Publ, Rep. Geod., No.3. (33), pp. 51-61, 1998.
• 13. Simek, J.: Geodynamical Network of the Czech Republic and National Densification of EUVN paper presented at the 5th International Seminar on GPS in Central Europe, Penc, Hungary 5-7 May 1999.
• 14. Sledzinski, J., Satellite Geodetic Traverses (SAGET) in Central and Soulhern Poland, Reports on Geodesy, 1(3), p. 7, 1991.