Comparison of Magnetic Field and Iron Loss Models for 2-Dimensional Magnetic Anisotropic Properties

• Autorzy: Wamija K. , Tamaki T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Porównanie różnych modeli strat przy obliczaniu dwuwymiarowym właściwości anizotropowych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In numerical analysis of electromagnetic equipment that contains magnetically anisotropic material, the model considering magnetic anisotropy should be used. In this work, conventionally proposed magnetic field and iron loss models that can take anisotropic magnetic property into account, are applied to some models to evaluate its accuracy. The two-axis magnetic field model can obtain similar distribution to the magnetic field by θHB model. Therefore by using BAI iron-loss model with two-axis magnetic field model, relatively accurate iron loss value can be estimated.

PL

Przy projektowaniu urządzeń magnetycznych z anizotropowym materiałem te właściwości anizotropowe powinny być brane pod uwagę. W przedstawionej pracy użyto konwencjonalnego HB modelu do obliczeń. Wyniki porównano z modelem kątowym θHB. Sprawdzono także model BAI.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

anisotropy; magnetic field analysis; 2D magnetic property; electrical technology; electrical power engineering

PL

anizotropia; analiza pola magnetycznego; elektrotechnika; elektroenergetyka

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Elektrotechniczny
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: R. 87, nr 9b
• Strony: 24--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Wamija K.

autor

Tamaki T.

• Nippon Steel Corporation,

Bibliografia

• [1] T. Kubota, M. Fujikura, M. Mizogami, and Y. Ushigami, “Electrical steel sheet for eco-design of electrical equipment,” Nippon Steel Technical Report (2000), No. 81, 53-57
• [2] K. Fujisaki, R. Hirayama, and Y. Nemoto, “Electromagnetic steel solution in electromagnetic field,” Nippon Steel Technical Report (2004), No. 89, 80-84
• [3] M. Enokizono and N. Soda, “Finite-element analysis of transformer model core with measured reluctivity,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, (1997), 4110-4112
• [4] K. Fujisaki, Y. Nemoto, S. Sato, M. Enokizono, and H. Shimoji, Proceeding of 7th International Workshop on 1&2-Dimensional Magnetic Measurement and Testing, edited by J. Sievert (PTBE- 81). (2002), 159
• [5] T. Nakata, K. Fujiwara, N. Takahashi, M. Nakano, and N. Okamoto, “An improved numerical analysis of flux distributions in anisotropic materials,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 30, (1994), 3395-3398
• [6] K. Fujisaki and S. Satoh, “Magnetic anisotropic calculation model by finite element method,” 9th Joint MMM/Intermag Conference, AT-14, (2004) 65.
• [7] K. Fujiwara, T. Adachi, and N. Takahashi, “A proposal of finiteelement analysis considering two-dimensional magnetic properties,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, (2002) no. 2, 889-892
• [8] T. Nakata, N. Takahashi, Finite element method in electromagnetic field, Tokyo, Japan: Morikita-shuppan, (1982).
• [9] M. Enokizono, “Two-dimensional Magnetic Properties,” Trans. IEE of Japan, vol. 115-A, (1995) no.1, 1-8
• [10] M. Nakano, H. Nishimoto, K. Fujiwara, and N. Takahashi, “Improvements of Single Sheet Testers for Measurement of 2- D Magnetic properties Up to High Flux Density,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 35, (1999) no. 5, 3965-3967