PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Subordination results and integral means inequalities for generalized k-starlike functions

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
Informatics and Related Fields / XIV International Conference on Mathematics (XIV ; 7-11.11.2008 ; Ustrzyki Dolne, Polska)
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the paper, we introduce a generalized class of k-starlike functions associated with Wright generalized hypergeometric functions and obtain the sequential subordination results and integral means inequalities. Some interesting consequences of our results are also pointed out.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
37--49
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz.
Twórcy
autor
Bibliografia
  • [1] M. K. Aouf and G.Murugusundaramoorthy, On a subclass of uniformly convex functions defined by the Dziok-Srivastava Operator, Austral. J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 3 (2007), (to appear).
  • [2] S. D. Bernardi, Convex and starlike univalent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 135 (1969), 429-446.
  • [3] R. Bharati, R. Parvatham and A. Swaminathan, On subclasses of uniformly convex functions and corresponding class of starlike functions, Tamkang J. Math., 26 (1) (1997), 17-32.
  • [4] B. C. Carlson and S. B. Shaffer, Starlike and prestarlike hypergeometric functions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15 (2002), 737-745.
  • [5] J.Dziok and Raina, Families of analytic functions associated with the Wright generalized hypergeometric function, Demonstratio Math., 37 (2004), No.3,533-542.
  • [6] J. Dziok and H. M. Srivastava,Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Intergral Transform Spec. Funct., 14 (2003), 7-18.
  • [7] J. Dziok ans H.M. Srivastava, Classes of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Appl. Math. Comput. 103 (1999), 1-13.
  • [8] B. A. Frasin, Subordination results for a class of analytic functions defined by a linear operator, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math., Vol.7, 4 (134) (2006), 1-7.
  • [9] A. W. Goodman, On uniformly convex functions, Ann. polon. Math., 56 (1991), 87-92.
  • [10] S. Kanas and H. M. Srivastava, Linear operators associated with k-uniformly convex functions, Intergral Transform Spec. Funct., 9 (2000), 121-132.
  • [11] S. Kanas and A.Wisniowska, Conic regions and k-uniformly convexity, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 105 (1999), 327-336.
  • [12] S. Kanas and A. Wisniowska, Conic regions and k-uniformly starlike functions, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures. Appl., 45(4) (2000), 647-657.
  • [13] R. J. Libera, Some classes of regular univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 16 (1965), 755-758.
  • [14] J. E. Littlewood, On inequalities in theory of functions, Proc. London Math. Soc., 23 (1925), 481-519.
  • [15] A. E. Livingston, On the radius of univalence of certain analytic functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 17 (1966), 352-357.
  • [16] W. C. Ma and D. Minda, Uniformly convex functions, Annal. Polon. Math., 57(2) (1992), 165-175.
  • [17] G.Murugusundaramoorthy and N.Magesh, A new subclass of uniformly convex functions and a corresponding subclass of starlike functions with fixed second coefficient, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math., Vol.5, 4 (85) (2004), 1-10.
  • [18] G.Murugusundaramoorthy and N.Magesh, Linear operators associated with a subclass of uniformly convex functions, Inter. J. Pure and Appl. Math., 3 (1) (2006), 123-135.
  • [19] G.Murugusundaramoorthy and N. Magesh, Integral means for univalent functions with negative coefficients, Inter. J. Computing Math. Appl., 1(1) (2007), 41-48.
  • [20] F. Ronning, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 118 (1993), 189-196.
  • [21] F. Ronning, On starlike functions associated with parabolic regions, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie - Sklodowska Sect. A, 45 (1991), 117-122.
  • [22] T. Rosy, K.G. Subramanian and G.Murugusundaramoorthy, Neighbourhoods and partial sums of starlike functions based on Ruscheweyh derivatives, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math., Vol.4, 4 (64) (2003), 1-8.
  • [23] St. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49 (1975), 109-115.
  • [24] H. Silverman, A survey with open problems on univalent functions whose coefficients are negative, Rocky Mt. J. Math., 21 (1991), 1099-1125.
  • [25] H. Silverman, Integral means for univalent functions with negative coefficients, Houston J. Math., 23 (1997), 169-174.
  • [26] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with varying arguments, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49 (1975), 109 - 115.
  • [27] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 51 (1975), 109-116.
  • [28] S. Singh, A subordination theorem for spirallike functions, Internat. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 24 (7) (2000), 433-435.
  • [29] H. M. Srivastava and S. Owa, Some characterization and distortion theorems involving fractional calculus, generalized hypergeometric functions, Hadamard products, linear operators and certain subclasses of analytic functions, Nagoya Math. J., 106 (1987), 1-28.
  • [30] K.G. Subramanian, G. Murugusundaramoorthy, P. Balasubrahmanyam and H. Silverman, Subclasses of uniformly convex and uniformly starlike functions, Math. Japon. 42 (1995), no. 3, 517-522.
  • [31] H. S. Wilf, Subordinating factor sequence for convex maps of the unit circle, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 12 (1961), 689-693.
  • [32] E.M. Wright, The asymptotic expansion of the generalized hypergeometric function, Proc. London. Math. Soc., 46 (1946), 389-408.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-PWA7-0039-0004
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.