Influences of Alternative Fuels GTL, RME and ROR on Combustion and Emissions of a Modern HD-Diesel Engine

• Autorzy: Czerwinski J. , Zimmerli Y. , Neubert T. , Heitzer A. , Kasper M.
• Konferencja: Kongres Silników Spalinowych (20-23.05.2007; Kraków, Poland)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Due to the limited energy resources as well as due to increasing CD2-emissions the importance of alterative- and biogene fuels is continuously increasing. Investigations of the engine operation were performed on a latest technology Liebherr engine for construction machines. It was operated using crude rapseed oil (RDR)'), rapeseed oil methyl ester (RME), synthetic Gas-To-Liquid fuel (GTL) and diesel (as reference fuel). The combustion diagnostics, the performance of the injection system as well as the pollutant emissions, including unlimited nanoparticles were assessed. The most important findings ean be summarized as joilows : Fuel injection - Both, RME and RDR shortened the injection delay which was due to a quicker increase of injection pressure and a faster needle lift, - the highest maximum injection pressure was observed with RDR (1610 bar), followed by RME (1580 bar), Diesel (1450 bar) and GTL (1410 bar), - As compared to diesel, GTL exhibited no significant differences of hydraulic behavior. Combustion - Usually, GTL caused a shorter ignition delay, but it burned slower, so that 50% of heat release took place at the same CA-position, as for Diesel. in addition, GTL provoked a lower rate of pressure raise and reduced the maximum combustion pressure. These effects were particularly pronounces at lower and medium loads. - At higher engine load RDR and RME started to bum earlier and at a higher rate, than Diesel and GTL. Therefore, 50% of the heat release followed with ROR and RME 1-2 CA earlier which had consequences for the NOx emissions. Limited emissions and energy consumption GTL lowered generally ail emission components - as compared to standard Diesel fuel. In addition, the energy consumption with GTL was equal or slightly lower. RME lowered CO and HC emissions and increased NOx emissions at ail operating points. It lowered PM at higher engine loads and increased PM at lower engine loads. RME had no effect on specific energy consumption. ROR lowered CO, HC and PM at ail operating points by at least 50% or more. In the high-load-operation RDR reduced the specific energy consumption (approx. 2%) and increased NOx (up to approx.5%). At low-load-operating points (1500 rpm/10%) ROR did not affect CO and NOx, but increased PM emissions and energy consumption. Nanoparticle emissions - GTL and diesel nanoparticle emissions were identical, - Both RME and RDR moved the PSD spectra to smaller sizes and increased the nuclei mode due to spontaneous condensate formation, - Both RME and RDR caused lower particle emissions at high load and higher emissions at low load, The use of ROR resulted in a particularly high portion of condensates (SDF) at low load and idling.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

alternative fuels; biofuels; diesel injection; diesel combustion; diesel emission; (nano) particulates; particle analysis

PL

paliwo alternatywne; biopaliwo; silnik Diesla; emisja; nanocząstki

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Naukowe Silników Spalinowych
• Czasopismo: Silniki Spalinowe
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: R. 46, nr SC3
• Strony: 180--200
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Czerwinski J.

autor

Zimmerli Y.

autor

Neubert T.

autor

Heitzer A.

autor

Kasper M.

• University of Applied Sciences, Biel-Bienne, Switzerland

Bibliografia

• [1] Lepperhoff, G.; Korfer, Th.; Pischinger, S.; Busch, H.; Keppe1er, S.; Schaberg, P.; Schnell, M.: Potential of Synthetic Fuels in Future Combustion Systems for HSDI Diesel Engines. FEV, RWTH Aachen, Daimler Chrysler, Sasol Chevron; SAE Techn. Paper 2006-01-0232, Detroit April 2006.
• [2] Herrmann, H-O.; Keppeler, S.; Botha, I.I.; Schaberg, P.; Schnell, M.: The Potential of Synthetic Fuels to meet Future Emission Regulations. Daimler Chrysler, Sasol Chevron. 27. Intern. Wiener Motorensymposium 2006, Bd. 2, S.73.
• [3] Geringer, B.: Aktuelle und zukünftige Anforderungen an Einspritzsysteme für Otto- und Dieselmotoren. CTI-Tagung "Einspritzsysteme für Dieselmotoren", Stuttgart 29-30. Marz 2006.
• [4] Gasification News, www.worldfuels.com/gasification news.
• [5] Krahl, J.; Munack, A; Schröder, O.; Stein, H.; Bunger, J.: Emissions- und Wirkungsvergleich verschiedener Dieselkraftstoffe mit Biodiesel. VDI Ber. Nr. 1808, 2003, VW Tagung Wolfsburg, Dez. 2003, S. 223.
• [6] Hausberger, S.: Partikelemissionen eines GVB-Stadtbusses bei Betrieb mit Biodiesel und Potentiale von nachrüstbaren Abgasnachbehandlungssystemen. FVT Forschungsgesellschaft für Verbrennungskraftmaschinen und Thermodynamik mbH, TU Graz, Bericht-Nr. FVT-03/6770-1, Mai 2003.
• [7] EPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions. US Environmental Protection Agency, Report EPA 420-P-02-001, Oct. 2002.
• [8] Czerwinski, J.; Petermann, J.-L.; Kasper, M.; Mosimann, Th.; Mayer, A: Untersuchungen der Abgasemissionen mit RME-Mischkraftstoffen und CRT am Liebherr D914T Baumaschinenmotor und am MAN-Bus der Basler Verkehrsbetriebe. AFHB, Matter Engineering, TTM, VERT-report B145, Apr. 2004- Apr. 2005.
• [9] Mayer, A; Czerwinski, J.; Wyser, M.; Mattrel, P.; Heitzer, A: Impact of RME/Diesel Blends on Particle Formation, Particle Filtration and PAH Emissions. TTM, AFHB, BUWAL, EMPA, EV ; SAE Paper 2005-01-1728, Detroit Apr. 2005.
• [10] Trapel, E.; Roth, P.: Schadstoffreduzierung eines Dieselmotors mit Direkteinspritzung durch Einsatz von Fettsaure-Methylester, Universität Duisburg-Essen, MTZ 1212004, s. 1020.
• [11] CO2-neutrale Wege zukünftiger Mobilität durch Biokraftstoffe - eine Bestandsaufnahme, Literaturstudie des IFEU im Auftrag der Forschungsvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinen FVV, Download möglich unter www.ufop.de. MTZ 12/2004, s. 954.
• [12] Mittelbach, M.; Remschmidt, C.: (2004) Biodiesel: The comprehensive handbook; Borsedruck GmbH, Wien, ISBN 3-200-00249-2.
• [13] www.biodiesel.ch, www.ecoenergie.ch
• [14] Gewinnung und Reinigung von Pflanzenölen in dezentralen Anlagen - Einflussfaktoren auf die Produktqualitat und den Produktionsprozess. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Heft Nr. 51, RB-Nr. 08/94/06, Feb. 1994.
• [15] Begleitforschung zu Standardisierung von Rapsöl als Kraftstoff für pflanzenöltaugliche Dieselmotoren in Fahrzeugen und BHKW. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Heft Nr. 69, RB-Nr. 08/00/81, Nov. 2000.
• [16] Rapsölkraftstoff in Traktoren und Blockheizkraftwerken. Tagungsband zum Internationalen Expertenforum, 25-26. Feb. 2002, Straubing, D.; Shaker Verlag Aachen ISBN 3-8322-1194-2.
• [17] Hemmerlein, N.; Korte, V.; Richter, H.; Schroder, G.: Performance, Exhaust Emissions and Durability of Modem Diesel Engines Running on Rapeseed Oil. SAE Techn. Paper 910848, Detroit Feb. 1991.
• [18] Maurer, K.: Motorpruflauf mit Rapsöl- Diesel- Mischungen. Universität Hohenheim, Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft1iches Maschinen- und Bauwesen (740), D-70593 Stuttgart FNR 22026800, Sept. 2003
• [19] http://www.biodiesel.de
• [20] Czerwinski, J.: Performance of HD-DI-Diesel Engine with Addition of Ethanol and Rapeseed Oil. SAE Techn. Paper 940545, Detroit, Feb. 1994.
• [21] Bialkowski, M.T.; Pekdemir, T.;Reuben, R; Brautsch, M.; Towers, D.P.; Elsbett, G.: Preliminary Approach Towards a CDI System Modification Operating on Neat Rapeseed Oil. Journal of KONES International Combustion Engines 2005, vol. 12, p. 31
• [22] Friess, W.; Herrmann, H.-O.; Maly, R.R; Schnell, M.; Schaberg, P.: Reductions in Exhaust Emissions with GTL Diesel Fuel. 20. Intern. VDI/VW - Gemeinschaftstagung, Wolfsburg, Dez. 2003, VDI Ber. Nr. 1808, S. 265.