Istota zakłóceń w zarządzaniu projektami

• Autorzy: Łapuńka I. , Knosala R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The nature of disruptions in the project management

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discusses these issues and seeks to clarify the nature of disruptions in project management. The idea that small disruptions can cause serious consequences to the life of a major project, well beyond that which might be easily attributed to their direct impact, is well established. Projects are often performed under high levels of uncertainty related to such factors as resource availability, unproven technology, team competence, and the commitment of upper management. Without any historical data or past experience, expert opinion and rough estimates might be the only way to quantify activity costs and durations in the initial planning stages. What results is an initial schedule designed to optimize some objective within the limits of uncertainty. As the project unfolds, differences between planned and actual costs, activity durations, and resource requirements begin to emerge. When the deviations become noticeable, we say that the project schedule is disrupted. For small deviations, the initial schedule may still be followed with little or no need for adjustment. In more serious cases, the initial schedule may no longer be optimal with respect to the original objective, and may not even be feasible. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide a structural framework for examining and resolving this type of problem. Our work falls in the growing field of disruption management which finds applications in the such diverse areas as transportation, ship building, and production planning, to name a few. Moreover, this paper describes the various types of disruptions appearing on the stage of project execution. And develops a classification scheme. We go on to discuss the nature of disruptions that occur in large engineering projects, and in particular present some of the issues that arise when change orders are the source of disruption and delay. Although there are some similarities between the original scheduling problem and the one that must be solved after a disruption, the differences are significant. In the latter case, decisions need to be made in a more timely manner. There is usually a trade off between making good decisions and speeding up the recovery process to avoid further difficulties. In addition, there may be new constraints and new commitments associated with activities underway, especially with respect to future activities that were not anticipated when the original schedule was drawn up. In last part, the analysis of activity network in the projects at the time of disruption and difficult selection of the best of scheduling variant are shown. The network diagram presenting the production preparation process of special purpose machine for deep hole drilling with gundrills is analyzed as example.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zarządzanie projektami; zarządzanie jakością; zarządzanie ryzykiem

EN

project management; quality management; risk management

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Zarządzania Produkcją
• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 13, nr 1
• Strony: 55--69
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Łapuńka I.

autor

Knosala R.

• Instytut Innowacyjności Procesów i Produktów Politechnika Opolska ul. Ozimska 75 45-370 Opole tel.: [phone],

Bibliografia

• [1] Adam E.E., Ebert R.J.: Productions and operations Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey 2009.
• [2] A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Fourth Edition. PMI, USA 2008.
• [3] Breiing A., Knosala R.: Bewerten technischer Systeme, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1997.
• [4] Kalinowski K.: Sterowanie przebiegiem produkcji w warunkach zakłóceń, wspomagane systemem eksperckim, Praca doktorska, Politechnika Śląska, Gliwice 2002.
• [5] Kalinowski K. Knosala R.: Rescheduling of Manufacturing Systems with use of an Expert System. Proceedings of the International Conference Naradie . Tools, Słowacja, Kocovce 2002.
• [6] Kerzner H.: Zarządzanie projektami. Studium przypadków, One Press . Helion, Warszawa 2005.
• [7] Knosala R., Łapuńka I.: Implementacja baz know-how w komputerowym systemie planowania realizacji projektu, [w:] Przegląd zastosowań informatyki, pod redakcją J. K. Grabary, J. S. Nowaka i T. Lisa, Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne . Oddział Górnośląski, Katowice 2008.
• [8] Krawczyk S.: Metody ilościowe w planowaniu (działalności przedsiębiorstwa), Tom I, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2001.
• [9] Lock D.: Podstawy zarządzania projektami, PWE, Warszawa 2009.
• [10] Łapuńka I., Knosala R.: System komputerowy wspomagający modyfikację planu realizacji projektu w warunkach zakłóceń, [w:] Komputerowo Zintegrowane Zarządzanie, pod redakcją R. Knosali, Tom I, Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, Opole 2007.
• [11] Łapuńka I., Knosala R.: Wielokryterialna ocena wariantów planu realizacji projektu techniczno-organizacyjnego, .Górnictwo Odkrywkowe. nr 7-8/2006.
• [12] Shenhar A.J., Wideman R.M.: Toward a Fundamental Differentiation between Project, PICMET, New Jersey 1997.
• [13] Sauer J.: Knowledge-Based Systems Techniques and Applications in Scheduling, [w:] Knowledge-Based Systems Techniques and Applications, ed T. L. Leondes, Academic Press, San Diego 1999.
• [14] Stępień P.: Wprowadzenie do zarządzania projektami. Project Management. [on-line] SkutecznyProjekt.pl, Dostępny w Internecie http://www.skutecznyprojekt.pl/artykul.php?AID=67
• [15] Trocki M., Grucza B., Ogonek K.: Zarządzanie projektami, PWE, Warszawa 2003.