Risk-based safety analysis in shipbuiding design. Part. I. Integrated approaches to safety analysis

• Autorzy: Semenov J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper analyzes methods of assessment of operating safety in ship design practice. Background experience in developing and implementing the method in shipbuilding industry is summarized. The advantages and disadvantages of diffrent approaches to operating safety analysis are discussed in both deterministic and probabilistic setting.

PL

Przedstawiono rolę czynników bezpieczeństwa w przedsiębiorstwach armatorskich. Wskazano na konieczność ich doskonalenia. Przeanalizowano metody oceny bezpieczeństwa eksploatacji jednostek morskich. Podsumowano uprzednie doświadczenia w rozwoju i wdrażaniu metod stosowanych w przemyśle stoczniowym. Omówiono strony dodatnie i ujemne różnych podejść do analizy eksploatacji pod kątem bezpieczeństwa w kontekście zarówno deterministycznym jak i probabilistycznym.

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences - Branch in Gdańsk Marine Technology Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Marine Technology Transactions. Technika Morska
• Rocznik: 2001
• Tom: Vol. 12
• Strony: 181--196
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Semenov J.

• Technical University of Szczecin, Faculty of Maritime Technology 71-065 Szczecin, Al. Piastów 41

Bibliografia

• 1. ABS, Rules Part 3 Section 2 Environmental Loadings, 1994.
• 2. API, Draft Recommended Practice for Planning. Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms — Load and Resistance Factor Design (RP 2A-LRFD), l" ed., Dec. 1989.
• 3. API. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed (offshore Platforms. 2A-LRFD. 1993.
• 4. Beghin D. , Emerging Trends in Ship Design, Bureau Veritas. 1997.
• 5. Cornell C. A. , Probability-Based Structural Code, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Vol. 66, 1969, 974-985.
• 6. Ditlevsen O.. Structural Reliability and the Invariance problem. Research Report Ne 22, Solid Mechanics Division, University of Waterloo, Waterm Canada, 1973.
• 7. Ditlevsen O.. Generalized Second Moment Reliability Index, Journal of Structural Mechanics, vol. 7, 1979.435—451.
• 8. DNV, Structural Reliability Analysis of Marine Structures, Classification Notes 30.6, July 1992. Graff W. J. , Introduction To Offshore Structures, Houston, USA, 1983. 195.
• 10. Hasofer A. M.. Lind N. C., Exact and Invariant Second Moment Code Format, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 1M), 1974, 1 11—121.
• 11. Kuo C. Managing Ship Safery, RINA, London, UK. 1999.
• 12. Madsen H. O.. Krenk S, Lind N. C., Methods of Structural Safety, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1986.
• 13. Mansour A. E.. An introduction to structural reliability theory, Ship Structure Committee Report SSC 3Sl , Washington, DC, 1990.
• 14. Semenov J N.. Making practical decision with consideration for ship service reliability. Polish Academy of Sciences — Branch in Gdansk, Marine Technology Transaction, vol. 8, 1997.227-232.
• 15. Semenov J. N.. Zakharov A. B., Estimation of system effects in structural designing of complex technical, IV Konferencja OKRETOWNICTWO I OCEANO TECHNIKA, PS-WTM PAN, Miedzyzdroje. 3-5.06.1998. 293-310.
• 16. Venesiano D. , Contributions to Second-Moment Reliability Theory, Research Report R 74-33. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Tech-Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1974.
• 17. Putresza J. , Jendo S. , Multicriterion reliability-bused optimization Of structure system PP. 727, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992.