Empirical study to identify the key business activities contributing to manufacturing business performance

• Autorzy: Huang T. T. , Stewart R. A. , Chen L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Within the context of high global competitiveness, knowledge management (KM) has proven to be one of the major factors contributing to enhanced business outcomes. Furthermore, knowledge sharing (KS) is one of the most critical of all KM activities. From a manufacturing industry perspective, supply chain management (SCM) and product development process (PDP) activities, require a high proportion of company resources such as budget and manpower. Therefore, manufacturing companies are striving to strengthen SCM, PDP and KS activities in order to accelerate rates of manufacturing process improvement, ultimately resulting in higher levels of business performance (BP). A theoretical framework along with a number of hypotheses are proposed and empirically tested through correlation, factor and path analyses. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey was administered to a sample of electronic manufacturing companies operating in Taiwan to facilitate testing the proposed relationships. More than 170 respondents from 83 organisations responded to the survey. The study identified top management commitment and employee empowerment, supplier evaluation and selection, and design simplification and modular design as the key business activities that are strongly associated with the business performance. Findings: The empirical study supports that key manufacturing business activities (i.e., SCM, PDP, and KS) are positively associated with BP. The findings also revealed that some specific business activities such as SCMF1, PDPF2, and KSF1 have the strongest influencing power on particular business outcomes (i.e., BPF1 and BPF2) within the context of electronic manufacturing companies operating in Taiwan. Practical implications: The finding regarding the relationship between SCM and BP identified the essential role of supplier evaluation and selection in improving business competitiveness and long term performance. The process of forming knowledge in companies, such as creation, storage/retrieval, and transfer do not necessarily lead to enhanced business performance; only through effectively applying knowledge to the right person at the right time does. Originality/value: Based on this finding it is recommended that companies should involve suppliers in partnerships to continuously improve operations and enhance product design efforts, which would ultimately enhance business performance. Business performance depends more on an employee's ability to turn knowledge into effective action.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

supply chain management; product development process; knowledge sharing; business performance

PL

zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw; proces rozwojowy; ocena przedsiębiorstwa

• Wydawca: International OCSCO World Press
• Czasopismo: Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 31, nr 2
• Strony: 747--755
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., wykr., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Huang T. T.

autor

Stewart R. A.

autor

Chen L.

• Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia,

Bibliografia

• [1] P. L. Liu, W. C. Chen, C. H. Tsai, An empirical study on the correlation between the knowledge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan's industries, Technovation 25 (2005) 637-644.
• [2] K. C. Tan, V. R. Kannan, R. B. Handfield, S. Ghosh, Supply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance, Operation and Production Management 19/10 (1999) 1034-1052.
• [3] R. Lubit, Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: The keys to sustainable competitive advantage, Organisational Dynamics 29/4 (2001) 164-178.
• [4] D. M. Lambert, M. C. Cooper, Issues in supplier chain management, Industrial Marketing Management 29 (2000) 65-83.
• [5] K. S. Chin, I. K. Yeung, K. F. Pun, Development of an assessment system for supplier quality management, Quality and Reliability Management 23/7 (2006) 743-765.
• [6] H. A. Artail, Application of KM measures to the impact of a specialized groupware system on corporate productivity and operations, Information and Management 43 (2006) 551-564.
• [7] P. Ingram, T. Simons, The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: implications for performance and competition, Management Science 48/12 (2002) 1517-1533.
• [8] S. Chopra, P. Meindl, Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001.
• [9] B. M. Beamon, Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods, Production Economics 55 (1998) 281-294.
• [10] K. C. Tan, V. R. Kannan, R. B. Handfield, S. Ghosh, Supply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance, Operations and Production Management 19/10 (1999) 1034-1052.
• [11] N. O. Ndubisi, M. Jantan, L. C. Hing, M. S. Ayub, Supply selection and management strategies and manufacturing flexibility, Enterprise Information Management 18/3 (2005) 330-349.
• [12] R. R. Lummus, R. J. Vokurka, Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines, Industrial Management and Data Systems 99/1 (1999) 11-17.
• [13] S. L. Ahire, P. Dreyfus, The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation, Operations Management 18 (2000) 549-575.
• [14] K. J. Petersen, R. B. Handfield, G. L. Ragatz, Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design, Operations Management 23 (2005) 371-388.
• [15] I. C. Hsu, Enhancing employee tendencies to share knowledge-Case studies of nine companies in Taiwan, Information Management 26 (2006) 326-338.
• [16] M. A. Vonderemvse, M. Tracey, The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance, Supply Chain Management 20 (1999) 33-39.
• [17] V. R. Kannan, K. C. Tan, Supplier selection and assessment: their impact on business performance, Supply Chain Management 38/4 (2002) 11-21.
• [18] A. C. Yeung, Strategic supply management, quality initiatives, and organizational performance, Operations Management 26/4 (2007) 490-502.
• [19] I. K. Yeung, K. S. Chin, Critical success factors of supplier quality management, The Asian Journal on Quality 5/1 (2004) 85-109.
• [20] F. Lemke, K. Goffin, M. Szwejczewski, Investigating the meaning of supplier-manufacturer partnership: an exploratory study, Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 33/1 (2003) 12-35.
• [21] P. Hong, M. A. Vonderembse, W. J. Doll, A. Y. Nahm, Role change of design engineers in product development, Operations Management 24 (2005) 63-79.
• [22] Y. Mastui, R. Filippini, H. Kitanaka, O. Sato, A comparative analysis of new product development by Italian and Japanese manufacturing companies: A case study, Production Economics 110 (2007) 16-24.
• [23] C. L. Tan, M. A. Vonderembse, Mediating effects of computer-aided design usage: From concurrent engineering to product development performance, Operations Management 24 (2006) 494-510.
• [24] Y. Y. Lu, C. Yang, The R & D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: An empirical study of Taiwan's IT industry, Industrial Marketing Management 33 (2004) 593-605.
• [25] B. Fynes, S. D. Burca, The effects of design quality on quality performance, Production Economics 96/1 (2005) 1-14.
• [26] S. Haag, P. Baltzan, A. Phillips, Business driven technology, Production Economics 96/1 (2006) 1-14.
• [27] S. M. Tseng, Knowledge management system performance measure index, Expert Systems with Applications 34 (2006) 734-745.
• [28] C. C. Law, E. E. Ngai, An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviours on firm performance, Expert Systems with Applications 34/4 (2007) 2342-2349.
• [29] R. Sanchez, Managing knowledge into competence: the five learning circles of the competent organisation, Knowledge Management and Organisational Competence, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001, 3-37.
• [30] A. L. Chua, S. L. Pan, Knowledge transfer and organizational learning in IS offshore sourcing, Management Science 36 (2006) 267-281.
• [31] T. Davenport, L. Prusak, Working knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
• [32] S. B. Modi, V. A. Mabert, Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer, Operations Management 25 (2006) 42-64.
• [33] P. Babcock, Shedding light on knowledge management, HRMagazine 49/5 (2004) 46-50.
• [34] A. Cabrera, E. F. Cabrera, Knowledge sharing dilemmas, Organization Studies 23/5 (2002) 687-710.
• [35] W. L. Neuman, Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, Fifth Edition, Allyn and Bacon, 2003.
• [36] A. C. Burns, R. F. Bush, Marketing research, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1998.
• [37] S. J. Coakes, SPSS: analysis without anguish: version 12.0 for windows, John Wiley & Son Australia, Ltd., 2005.
• [38] J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, W. C. Black, Multivariate data analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1998.