Numerical aspects of multiple-sensor measurements with potentiometric sensors

• Autorzy: Opalski L. J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper compares accuracy and measurement range for two techniques of multiple-sensor measurement of ion concentration in water with potentiometric ion selective sensors: a single-sensor-at-a-time measurement and multi-sensor Data Fusion based measurement. A problem of entangled measurement ranges is defined and a rational solution presented.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

calibration-based measurement; measurement uncertainty; potentiometric sensors; Nikolsky-Eisenmann model; non-linear least squares model fitting

PL

niepewność pomiaru; niepewność kalibracji; czujniki potencjometryczne; model Nikolskiego-Eisenmanna

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Electronics and Telecommunication
• Czasopismo: Electronics and Telecommunications Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 54, No 4
• Strony: 561--575
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Opalski L. J.

• Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warszawa,

Bibliografia

• 1. E. Bakker, Yu Gin: Electrochemical Sensors, Anal. Chem., vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 3965-3983, 2006.
• 2. R. Mamińska, W. Wróblewski: Solid-state microelectrodes for flow-cell analysis based on planar back-side contact transducers, Electroanalysis, vol. 18, pp. 1347-1353, 2006.
• 3. L. J. Opalski: Data Fusion for CHEMFET Arrays, Bulletin of the Polish Acad. of Sc., vol. 4, pp. 287-293, 2002.
• 4. A. Fi1ipkowski, L. J. Opa1ski: Towards a Web enabled multi-sensor monitoring system: the EU FP6 WARMER project, Proc. SPIE, 6937, 2G(l-9) , 2007
• 5. EU-WFD 2003. Common implementation strategy for the Water Frame Work Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance Document No. 7. Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive Produced by Working Group 2.7 - Monitoring (2003), see also http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/wfd/library
• 6. G. Eisenmann: Glass electrodes for hydrogen and other cations, principles and practice, M. Dekker Inc., New York (1967).
• 7. J. Inczedy, T. Lengyel, A. M. Ure: Compendium of analytical nomenclature, Int. Union of Pure and Appl. Chem., 3rd edition, 1997.
• 8. M. Nagele, E. Bakker, E. Pretsch: General description of the simultaneous response of potentiometric ionophore-based sensors to ions of different charge, Anal. Chem., 71, pp. 1041-1048, 1999.
• 9. J. Ogrodzki: Modeling of potentiometric sensors sensitive to ions of valency one and two for possible applications in WARMER project, Proc. SPIE, 6937, 2.1(1-8), 2007.
• 10. M. A. Sharaf, D. L. Illman, B. R. Kowalski: Chemometrics, J. Wiley & Sons, 1986.
• 11. L. J. Opalski: Data Fusion for CHEMFET-based measurements, Proc. MIXDES, pp. 257-362, Lodz, Poland, 2004.
• 12. L. J. Opalski, K. M. Opalska: Optimizing CHEMFET-based measurements, Proc. MIXDES, pp. 521-526, Lodz, Poland, 2005.