Face diagrams

• Autorzy: Wyatt R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We describe a method for succinctly summarizing multi-dimensional data. It involves using computer-generated diagrams of faces in which the size of each feature is proportional to some parameter or dimension. Unlike the previous attempts by researchers to use face diagrams, our method insists that all facial features have constant locations, standard shapes and identical maximum possible sizes. This minimizes any tendency for observers to notice some facial parameters more than others or to interpret the face emotionally. We then present a case study in which our face diagrams were used by some advice-giving software to pictorialize different people's respective planning styles. The ability of our method to prompt new and deeper insights is highlighted.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multi-dimensional data; face diagrams; graphic communication; diagramming; decision making; planning

• Wydawca: Institute of Information Technology of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW
• Czasopismo: Machine Graphics and Vision
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: Vol. 12, No. 3
• Strony: 335--352
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Wyatt R.

• School of Antropology, Geography and Environmental Studies Melbourne University, Australia,

Bibliografia

• [1] Woodworth R.S.: Experimental Psychology. NY, Holt. 1938.
• [2] Samuels M.R.: Judgments of faces. Character and Personality, 8, 18-27. 1939.
• [3] Secord P. F., Dukes W. F., Bevan W.: Personalities in faces: l. An experiment in social perceiving. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 49, 231-279. 1954.
• [4] Secord P.F., Muthard J.E.: Personalities in faces IV. A descriptive analysis of the perception of women's faces and the identification of some physiognomic determinants . J. of Psychology, 39, 269-278. 1955.
• [5] Guthrie R.D.: Evolution of human threat display organs. Dobzhansky T., Hecht M.K., Steere W.C. (Eds.): Evolutionary Biology, NY, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 4 257-302. 1970.
• [6] Chernoff H.: Using faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. J. of the American Statistical Association, 68. 1973.
• [7] Cohen R.: Patterns of Personality Judgment. NY, AP. 1973.
• [8] Kleck R ., Rubenstein C.: Physical attractiveness, perceived attitude similarity, and interpersonal attraction in an opposite-sex encounter. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 107-114. 1975.
• [9] Everitt B.S.: Graphical Techniques for Multivariate Data. London, Heinemann. 1978.
• [10] Coleman V., Coleman M.: Face values. London, Pan. 1981.
• [11] Dennett D C.: The nature of images and the introspective trap. Block N. (Ed.) Imagery Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 51-61. 1981.
• [12] Dennett D C.: Two approaches to mental imagery. Block N. (Ed.): Imagery Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 87-107. 1981.
• [13] Gould S.J.: The Mismeasure of Man. NY, W.W. Norton. 1981.
• [14] Hood C., Dunshire A.: Bureaumetrics - the qualitative comparison of British central government agencies. Farnborough, Hants., Gower. 1981.
• [15] Maruyama G., Miller N.: Physical attractiveness and personality. Mahrer B. (Ed.): Progress in Experimental Research in Personality, 10, NY, AP. 1981.
• [16] Cash T., Cash D.: Women's use of cosmetics: psychosocial correlates and consequences. Int. J. of Cosmetic Science, 4, 1-14. 1982.
• [17] Keating C.F.: Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 61-70. 1985.
• [18] De Jong W., Kleck R.: The social psychological effects of overweight. Herman C., Zanna M., Higgins E. (Eds.): Physical Appearance, Stigma and Social Behaviour, Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum. 1986.
• [19] Hatfield E., Sprecher S.: Mirror, mirror: the importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, State University of New York. 1986.
• [20] Wilde R.: Problems: Solutions - Visual Thinking for Graphic Communications. NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1986.
• [21] McArthur L.Z., Berry D.S.: Cross-cuitural agreement in perception of babyfaced adults. J. of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18, 165-192. 1987.
• [22] Alley T. R.: Physiognomy and social perception. Alley T.A. (Ed.) Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum. 1988.
• [23] Bull R., Rumsey N.: SSSP: the social psychology of facial appearance. Berlin, S-V. 1988.
• [24] Landau T.: About Faces. NY, Doubleday. 1989.
• [25] Vandyke S.: (Third Edition) From Line to Design - Design Graphics Communication. NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1990.
• [26] Simmonds D., Reynolds L.: Data Presentation and Visual Literacy in Medicine and Science. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann. 1994.
• [27] Chandrasekaran B., Glasgow J., Hari Narayanan N. (Eds.): Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Menlo Park, CA, AAAI Press/MIT Press. 1995.
• [28] Dorling D.: A New Social Atlas of Britain Chichester. John Wiley. 1995.
• [29] Funt B.V.: Problem-solving with diagrammatic representation. Chandrasekaran B., Glasgow, J., Hari Narayanan N. (Eds.): Diagrammatic reasoning: cognitive and computational perspectives, Menlo Park, CA, AAAI Press/MIT Press, 33-68. 1995.
• [30] Larkin J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Chandrasekaran B., Glasgow J., Hari Narayanan N. (Eds.): Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, Menlo Park, CA, AAAI Press/MIT Press, 69-109. 1995.
• [31] Lindsay R.K.: Images and inference. Chandrasekaran B., Glasgow J., Hari Narayanan N. (Eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, Menlo Park, CA, AAAI Press/MIT Press, 111-135. 1995.
• [32] Stenning K., Oberlander J.: A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140. 1995.
• [33] Tufte E.R.: - Visual Explanation. Cheshire, CT, Graphics Press. 1997.
• [34] Briggs C.A.: Anthropological assessment. Clement J.G. & Ranson D.L. (Eds.) Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, London, Arnold, 49-61. 1998.
• [35] Briggs C.A., Martakis M.: Craniofacial anatomy. Clement J.G. & Ranson D .L. (Eds.) Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, London, Arnold , 37-47. 1998.
• [36] Feik S.A., Glover J.E.: Growth of children's faces. Clement J.G., Ranson D.L. (Eds.): Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, London, Arnold, 203-224. 1998.
• [37] Neave R.: Age changes to the face in adulthood faces. Clement J.G., Ranson D .L. (Eds.): Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine, London, Arnold, 225-231. 1998.
• [38] Schlyder D.A.: - Graphi c:' design - a business app li cation. Toowoomba, Australia, P.C .S. Publications. 1998.
• [39] Wyatt R., Smith J.: Digital simulation of option-choice behaviour. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, 331-354. 2000.
• [40] Howse J., Molina F., Shin S., Taylor J.: On diagram tokens and types. Hagarty M., Meyer B., Hari Narayanan, N.: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Berlin, Springer, 146-160. 2002.
• [41] Shimojima A.: The inferential expressive trade-off: a case study of tabular representation certainty. Hagarty M., Meyer B., Hari Narayanan N.: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Berlin, Springer, 116-130. 2002.
• [42] Wyatt R.: Decision intelligence: predicting people's policymaking styles. Int. J. of Information Technology and Decision Making, 1(2), 311-329. 2002.