Examination of Transmission Quality in the IP Multi-Protocol Label Switching Corporate Networks

• Autorzy: Strzęciwilk D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents the examination of quality of transmission designed and built based on IP/MPLS technology as well as BGP and OSPF routing protocols of corporate network. It indicates the factors forming and affecting the service quality in IP network, including QoS support network architecture, particularly the architecture of DiffServ differentiated services. Main problems occurring in these architectures have been discussed. The analysis of data and voice transmission via IP network of Best Effort architecture and in Differentiated Service architecture of differentiated transmission quality have been conducted. It has been presented that the MPLS technology may be effectively applied in building corporate networks requiring network services of highest quality parameters with lossless packet transmission and maximum delay guarantee.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

P/MPLS network; DiffServ architecture; VoIP; transmission quality; quality of service

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Electronics and Telecommunication
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 58, No. 3
• Strony: 267--272
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Strzęciwilk D.

• Department of Application of Informatics, Warsaw Univeristy of Life Sciences (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] L. D. Ghein, MPLS Fundamentals. Indianapolis, USA: Cisco Press, 2007.
• [2] J. Postel (ed.), Internet protocol - DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification, USC/Information Science Institute RFC 791, September 1981.
• [3] A. Grenville, Quality of Service in IP Networks. Pearson Higher Education, 2000.
• [4] D. Hucaby, CCNP BCMSN exam certification guide: CCNP self-study. Indianapolis, USA: Cisco Press, 2006.
• [5] K. Ahlin, Quality of Service Over IP Networks. Linköping: Linköping University, 2003.
• [6] IP Packet Transfer and Availability Performance Parameters, ITU-T Rec. Y.1540, December 2002.
• [7] Network Performance objectives for IP-based services, ITU-T Rec. Y.1541, May 2002.
• [8] J. Babiarz, K. Chan, and F. Baker, Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes, Working Group of the IETF RFC 4594, August 2006.
• [9] E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon, Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture, The Internet Society RFC 3031, January 2001.
• [10] U. Black, MPLS and Label Switching Networks, 2nd ed. Singapore: Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte. Ltd, Indian Branch, 2002.
• [11] G. Armitage, “MPLS the magic behind the myths,” IEEE Commun. Mag, vol. 38, p. 124, 2000.
• [12] G. Murugesan, A. M. Natarajan, and C. Venkatesh, “Enhanced Variable Splitting Ratio Algorithm for Effective Load Balancing in MPLS Networks,” Journal of Computer Science, no. 4(3), pp. 232-238, 2008.
• [13] Y. Bernet, S. Blake, D. Grossman, and A. Smith, An Informal Management Model for Diffserv Routers, IETF RFC 3290, May 2002.
• [14] R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview, IETF RFC 1633, June 1994.
• [15] W. Stalling, Computer networking and internet protocols and technology. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education, 2004.
• [16] S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss, An Architecture for Architecture for Differentiated Services, IETF RFC 2475, December 1998.
• [17] S. Shenker, C. Partridge, and R. Guerin, Specification of guaranteed quality of service, IETF RFC 2212, September 1997.
• [18] Y. Bernet, et al., A Framework for Integrated Services Operation over DiffServ Networks, IETF RFC 2998, November 2000.
• [19] Z. Mammeri, “Framework for parameter mapping to provide endto-end QoS guarantees in IntServ/DiffServ architectures,” Computer Communications, vol. 28 issue 9, pp. 1074-1092, June 2005.
• [20] Y. C. Chang, R. C. Wang, J. L. Chen, and C. Kuo, “Scheduling Mechanism for IntServ/DiffServ Network Services,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Multi-Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications, Banff, Canada, July 2004, pp. 184-189.
• [21] Z. Mammeri, “End-to-End QoS Mapping in IntServ-over-DiffServ Architectures,” in High-Speed Networks and Multimedia Communications, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Freire, P. Lorenz, and M.-O. Lee, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003, vol. 2720, pp. 31-40, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45076-4_4.
• [22] H. Bai, M. Atiquzzaman, and W. A. Ivancic, “Running integrated services over differentiated service networks: quantitative performance measurements,” M. Atiquzzaman and M. Hassan, Eds., vol. 4866, no. 1. Boston, MA, USA: SPIE, 2002, pp. 11-22, DOI: 10.1117/12.473015.
• [23] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, and D. Black, Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers, IETF RFC 2474, December 1998.
• [24] W. Zhao, D. Olshefski, and H. Schulzrinne, “Internet Quality of Service: an overview,” Columbia University, Computer Science Dept., Tech. Rep. Technical Report CUCS-003-00, February 2000.
• [25] V. Jacobson, K. Nicholas, and I. Poduri, An expedited forwarding PHB, IETF RFC 2598, June 1999.
• [26] G. Armitage, B. Carpenter, A. Casati, J. Crowcroft, J. Halpern, B. Kumar, and J. Schnizlein, A delay bound alternative revision of RFC 2598, IETF RFC 3246, March 2002.
• [27] B. Davie, et al., An Expedited Forwarding PHB (Per-Hop Behavior), IETF RFC 3246, March 2002.
• [28] J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski, Assured Forwarding PHB Group, IETF RFC 2597, June 1999.
• [29] S. Bradner, Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Device, IETF RFC 2544, March 1999.