Sensor-Actor Network Solution for Scalable Ad-hoc Sensor Networks

• Autorzy: Chaczko Z. , Chiu C. , Aslanzadeh S. , Dune T.
• Konferencja: International Conference on System Engineering - ICSEng (21 ; 16-18.08.2011) ; Las Vegas, USA
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Architects of ad-hoc wireless Sensor-Actor Networks (SANETS) face various problems and challenges. The main limitations relate to aspects such as the number of sensor nodes involved, low bandwidth, management of resources and issues related to energy management. In order for these networks to be functionally proficient, the underlying software system must be able to effectively handle unreliable and dynamic distributed communication, power constraints of wireless devices, failure of hardware devices in hostile environments and the remote allocation of distributed processing tasks throughout the wireless network. The solution must be solved in a highly scalable manner. This paper provides the requirements analysis and presents the design of a software system middleware that provides a scalable solution for ad-hoc sensor network infrastructure made of both stationary and mobile sensors and actuators.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sensor actuator networks; SANETS; ad hoc wireless sensor networks; WSNS; middleware; distributed software services

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Electronics and Telecommunication
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol, 58, No. 1
• Strony: 55--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Chaczko Z.

• Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

autor

Chiu C.

• Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

autor

Aslanzadeh S.

• Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

autor

Dune T.

• Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

Bibliografia

• [1] C. Shen and C. Srisathapornphat, “Sensor Information Networking Architecture and Applications, University of Delaware,” in IEEE Personal Communications, August 2001, p. 52.
• [2] C. Szyperski, “Emerging component software technologies – A Strategic Comparison,” Software Concepts and Tools, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 1998.
• [3] F. Golatowski, J. Blumenthal, M. Handy, M. Haase, H. Burchardt, and D. Timmermann, “Service-Oriented Software Architecture for Sensor Networks,” in Proceedings of International Workshop on Mobile Computing (IMC’03), Rockstock, Germany, June 2003, pp. 93–98.
• [4] A. Rezgui and M. Eltoweissy, “Service-Oriented Sensor-Actuator Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 92–100, 2007.
• [5] X. Chu and R. Buyya, Sensor Network and Configuration: Fundamentals, Standards, Platforms, and Applications. Germany: Springer-Verlag, January 2007, ch. Service Oriented Sensor Web, pp. 51–74.
• [6] A. G. Ganek and T. A. Corbi, “The dawning of the Autonomic Computing Era,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2003.
• [7] I. F. Akyildiz and I. H. Kasimoglu, “Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks: Research Challenges,” Ad-hoc Nets, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 351–367, 2004.
• [8] Z. Chaczko and R. Klempous, “Anticipatory Biomimetic Middleware,” in Journal of American Institute of Physics (AIP), Casys 2009, Liege, Belgium, August 2009.
• [9] Z. Chaczko, R. Kohli, R. Klempous, and J. Nikodem, “Middleware Integration Model for Smart Hospital System Using the Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF),” in 14th International Conference On Intelligent Engineering Systems, INES 2010, Las Palmas of Gran Canaria, Spain, May 5–7 2010.
• [10] TINI Website and Development, (2010) Tiny InterNet Interface, http://www.ibutton.com/TINI/index.html, last visited June 2010.
• [11] E. C. H. Ngai, M. R. Lyu, and J. Liu, “A Real-Time Communication Framework for Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, U.S.A., March 2006.
• [12] C. Y. Chong and S. P. Kumar, “Sensor Networks: Evolution, Opportunities, and Challenges,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1247–1256, 2003.
• [13] D. Estrin, Center for Embedded Network Sensing. Los Angeles: Computer Science Department, University of California, 2001.
• [14] C. Zhong, Pico Radios: What does it take to design a link between them? Department of EECS, UC Berkeley, 2004.
• [15] R. Vidhyapriya and P. T. Vanathi, “Conserving Energy in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 37–42, 2007.
• [16] F. Xia, Y. C. Tian, Y. J. Li, and Y. X. Sun, “Wireless Sensor/Actuator Network Design for Mobile Control Applications,” Sensors, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2157–2173, 2007.
• [17] JINI Website, (2010), http://www.jini.org/, last visited May 2010.
• [18] Z. Chaczko and G. Resconi, “Organising Software Infrastructures: EgoMorphic BIM Model, Conscious Brain and Education – Mind and Living Systems, Risk Management, Economical Systems, and Social Models, Applied Mathematics, Programming, and Biomimetic Tools,” in Partial Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference CASYS’07 on Computing Anticipatory Systems, D. M. Dubois, Ed., Liege, Belgium, August 6–11 2008, application of Biomimetic Design Methods in Infrastructure Systems. Chaos, Liège, Belgium, Vol.21. pp.372–385.
• [19] I. Gorton and S. Motwani, “Issues in co-operative software engineering using globally distributed teams,” Information and Software Technology, Elsevier Science, vol. 38, pp. 647–655, 1996.
• [20] E. C. H. Ngai, Y. Zhou, M. R. Lyu, and J. Liu, “Reliable Reporting of Delay-Sensitive Events in Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conf.erence on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS’06), Vancouver, Canada, October 2006.
• [21] F. Xia, W. H. Zhao, Y. X. Sun, and Y. C. Tian, “Fuzzy Logic Control Based QoS Management in Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks,” Sensors, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3179–3191, 2007.