Dialog o przemiennej inicjatywie w systemie dialogowym języka mówionego

• Autorzy: Wiśniewski A. M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Mixed initiative dialogue in spoken language dialogue system

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Przedstawiono szczegółową architekturę systemu dialogowego języka mówionego. Scharakteryzowano style dialogu i cechy dialogu o przemiennej inicjatywie. Omówiono problemy zarządzania dialogiem z przemienną inicjatywą i dostosowania systemów dialogowych do użytkownika.

EN

In this paper, the detailed structure of spoken language dialogue system was described. Dialogue styles and features of mixed initiative dialogue were characterized. Problems of mixed initiative dialogue management and spoken dialogue systems personalization were described.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

system dialogowy; przemienna inicjatywa

EN

dialogue system; mixed initiative

• Wydawca: Instytut Teleinformatyki i Automatyki, Wydział Cybernetyki, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego
• Czasopismo: Biuletyn Instytutu Automatyki i Robotyki
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: R. 15, nr 27
• Strony: 97--113
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., 2 tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Wiśniewski A. M.

• Zakład Automatyki, Instytut Teleinformatyki i Automatyki WAT, ul. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warszawa

Bibliografia

• [1] Allen J., et al., The TRAINS project: A case study in defining a conversational planning agent, J. of Experimental and Theoretical AI, vol. 7, 1995, pp. 7-48.
• [2] Baptist L., Seneff S., A versatile system for language generation in conversational system applications, Proc. ICSLP, Beijing, 2000.
• [3] Barnard E., et al., A co nsistent approach to designing spoken-dialog systems, Proc. ASRU Workshop, Keystone, CO, 1999.
• [4] Bazzi I., Glass J., Modeling out-of-vocabulary words for robust speech recognition, Proc. ICSLP, Beijing, China, 2000, pp. 401–404.
• [5] Billi R., et al., Automation of Telecom Italia Directory Assistance Service: Field Trial Results, Proc. IVTTA, 1998, pp. 11–16.
• [6] Black A., Lenzo K., Pagel V., Issues in building general letter to sound rules, Proc. ESCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, 1998.
• [7] Blomberg M., et al., An experimental dialogue system: Waxholm, Proc. Eurospeech, 1993, pp. 1867-1870.
• [8] Derthick M., et al., Example-Based Generation of Custom Data Analysis Applications, Proc. IUI, Santa Fe, 2001, pp. 57–64.
• [9] Filisko E., Seneff S., A context resolution server for the conversational systems, Proc. Eurospeech, Geneva, 2003, pp. 197–290.
• [10] Flammia G., Discourse Segmentation of Spoken Dialogue: An Empirical Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1998.
• [11] Glass J., A probabilistic framework for segment-based speech recognition, Computer, Speech, and Language, 17, 2003, pp. 137-152.
• [12] Glass J., Weinstein E., Facilitating spoken dialogue systems development, Proc. Eurospeech, Aalborg, 2001, pp. 1335–1338.
• [13] Gorin A., Riccardi G., Wright J., How may I help you?, Speech Communication, 23, 1997, pp. 113–127.
• [14] MIT Project Oxygen web site, http://oxygen.lcs.mit.edu.
• [15] Nakano M., Hazen T., Using untranscribed user utterances for improving language models based on confidence scoring, Proc. Eurospeech, Geneva, 2003, pp. 417–420.
• [16] Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com.
• [17] Polifroni J., et al., Towards the automatic generation of mixed-initiative dialogue systems from web content, Proc. Eurospeech, Geneva, 2003.
• [18] Polifroni J., Chung G., Promoting portability in dialogue management, Proc. ICSLP, Denver, CO, 2002, pp. 2721–2724.
• [19] Popescu A.M., Etzioni O., Kautz H., Towards a Theory of Natural Language Interfaces to Databases, Proc. IUI, Miami, 2003.
• [20] Rosset S., et al., Design strategies for spoken language dialog systems, Proc. Eurospeech, 1999, pp. 1535–1538.
• [21] Rudnicky A., et al., Creating natural dialogs in the Carnegie Mellon Communicator system, Proc. Eurospeech, 1999, pp. 1531–1534.
• [22] Schalkwyk J., et al., Speech recognition with dynamic grammars using finite-state transducers, Proc. Eurospeech, Geneva, 2003, pp. 1969–1972.
• [23] Seneff S., A natural language system for spoken language applications, Computational Linguistics, 18(1), 1992.
• [24] Seneff S., et al., Automatic induction of gram language models from a natural language grammar, Proc. Eurospeech, Geneva, 2003, pp. 641–644.
• [25] Seneff S., et al., A reference architecture for conversational system development, Proc. ICSLP, 1998, pp. 931–934.
• [26] Seneff S., Polifroni J., Dialogue management in the flight reservation system, Proc. ANLP-NAACL Sat. Workshop, Seattle, 2000.
• [27] Souvignier V., et al., The thoughtful elephant: Strategies for spoken dialogue systems, IEEE Trans. SAP, 8(1), 2000, pp. 51–62.
• [28] Starkie B., et al., Lyrebird: Developing spoken dialog systems using examples, Proc. ICGI, 2002, pp. 309–311.
• [29] Steele K., Waterman J., Weinstein E., The Oxygen H21 handheld, MIT Lab. for Computer Science Research Summary, March 2003.
• [30] Sutton S., et al., Universal speech tools: The CSLU toolkit, Proc. ICSLP, Sydney, 1998, pp. 3221–3224.
• [31] Toth A., et al., Towards every-citizen’s speech interface: An application generator for speech interfaces to databases, Proc. ICSLP, Denver, CO, 2002, pp.1497–1500.
• [32] Zue V. et al., A telephone-based conversational interface for weather information, IEEE Trans. SAP, 8(1), 2000, pp. 85–96.
• [33] Zue V., Glass J., Conversational interfaces: Advances and challenges, Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8), 2000, pp. 1166–1180.
• [34] http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/english.asp ; http://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml/.