PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Oil, grease and used petroleum oil management and environmental economic issues

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: This paper undertakes to answer the question of how used petroleum oil and grease enter groundwater or to the drain becoming both environmental and economic problems to utility companies. Design/methodology/approach: Laboratory methodology was based on modern instrumentation validated further with experimental investigation. Petroleum-contaminated soil samples were analyzed for oil and grease (O/G) content, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and volatile aromatic compounds: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and naphthalene. Gas chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to analyse BTEX and naphthalene analytes. Findings: The results show that total petroleum hydrocarbon fraction (TPH) accounted for oil and grease (O/G) and the ratio of [TPH]/[O/G] ranged from 12% to 50%. The results of volatile organic fraction (BTEX) accounted for only a small part of total TPH and the ratio of [BTEX]/[TPH] ranged below 1%. The concentration of four samples for TPH test exceeded the regulatory limit of 500 ppm for hydrocarbons. The gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) method appear to offer the best basis for standard TPH test in soil and groundwater verification of site cleanup. Research limitations/implications: In the future it will be possible to apply the procedures to other more complicated cases e.g. used oil containing more than 1000 ppm total halogens, which is regulated as hazardous waste. Practical implications: Promising directions for adaptation of appropriate pre-treatment standard processes for recycling programs, pollution prevention and reduction of maintenance cost. Originality/value: The gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) methods appear to offer the best hope for standard TPH test in soil and groundwater verification of site cleanup. Implementation of management standards and a permit policy for O/G and used oil generators will be issued to each facility.
Rocznik
Strony
11--17
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 26 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
  • Faculty of Technology and Chemical Engineering, University of Technology and Life Sciences, ul. Seminaryjna 3, 85-326 Bydgoszcz, Poland, zpawlak@xmission.com
Bibliografia
  • [1] US EPA, The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 40 CFR 403.5 (b) (6), National pretreatment standards. Prohibited discharges.
  • [2] US Water Environment Federation (1973), Pretreatment of industrial wastes. Manual of Practice FD-3.
  • [3] Colorado Department of Health and Environment, Management standards for used oil generators guidance document, February (2005). www.cdphe.state.co.us/HM/oilgen.pdf
  • [4] T. Rauckyte, D. J. Hargreaves, Z. Pawlak, Determination of heavy metals and volatile aromatic compounds in used engine oils and sludge, Fuel 85 (2006) 481-485.
  • [5] Research Triangle Institute. Toxicological Profile for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Prepared for the US Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
  • [6] M. A. Mills, T. J. McDonald, J. S. Bonner, M. A. Simon, R. L. Autenrieth, Method for quantifying the fate of petroleum in the environment, Chemosphere 39 (1999) 2563-2582.
  • [7] J. Gustafson, Using TPH in risk-based corrective action. Shell development corporation, Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/swerust1/rbdm/tphrbca.htm; 1997.
  • [8] ABB-Environmental, Compilation of Data on the Composition, Physical Characteristics and Water Solubility of Fuel Products, Prepared for Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Wakefield, Massachusetts, 1990.
  • [9] S. George, Bias associated with the use of EPA Method 418.1 for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soils. In: E. J. Calabrese, P. T. Kostecki, M. Bonazountas, (Eds.), Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich., vol. 4 (Perspectives, analysis, human health and risk assessment, remediation), chapter 8, 1994, 115-142.
  • [10] IARC. Mineral Oils. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Cancerogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, International Agency for Research Cancer 33 (1984) 87-168.
  • [11] A. A. Romeu, C. King, D. J. Blevins, N. J. Soutor, Mobilization of volatile toxic components from petroleum product-contaminated soils by TCLP, ASTM Special Technical Publication no. 1062, 2 (1990) 228-243.
  • [12] A. D. Eaton, L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg, M. A. H. Franson, (Eds). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1995.
  • [13] US EPA Method 8015B. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Analysis Gasoline and Diesel Fuel, 1986.
  • [14] US EPA Method 1664. N-Hexane Extractable Material (HEM) and Silica Gel Treated n-Hexane Extractable Material (SGT-HEM) by Extraction and Gravimetry (Oil and Grease and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons) Revision: September 1998; updated: December 2002.
  • [15] US EPA Method 9071A. Mercury in Semisolid and Solid Waste by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 1990.
  • [16] US EPA Method 8020B. Aromatic Volatile Organics by Gas Chromatography (SW-846, 3rd Edition), 1992.
  • [17] US EPA. Definition and procedure for determination of the method detection limit-revision 1.11. Federal Register 49(209) 1984, 198-199.
  • [18] R. Becker, M. Koch, S. Wachholz, T. Win, Quantification of total petrol hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil by IR-spectroscopy and gas chromatography- conclusions from three proficiency testing rounds, Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement 7 (2002) 286-289.
  • [19] M. G. Fitzpatrick, S. S. Tan, Recent advances in the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soils, Chemistry in New Zealand, 57 (1993) 22-23.
  • [20] G. Xie, M. J. Barcelona, Efficient quantification of total petroleum hydrocarbons and applications at two contaminated sites, Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 21 (2001) 64-70.
  • [21] G. Xie, M. J. Barcelona, J. Fang, Quantification and interpretation of total petroleum hydrocarbons in sediment samples by GC/MS method and comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method, Analytical Chemistry 71 (1999) 1899-1904.
  • [22] ASDR. Minimal Risk Level for Priority Substances and Guidance for Derivation, Republication. Federal Register 61 FR 125 (1996) 33511-33520.
  • [23] E. David, Extraction of valuable from amorphous solid waste, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 25 (2007) 15-18.
  • [24] E. Brinksmeier, J. Eckebrecht, H. Buhr, Improving ecological aspect of the grinding processes by effective waste management, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 44 (1994) 171-178.
  • [25] S. Paul, N. R. Dhar, B. Chattopadhyay, Beneficial effect of criyogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 116 (2001) 44-48.
  • [26] R. F. Avila, A. M. Abrao, The effect of cutting fluids on the machining of hardened AISI 4340 steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 119 (2001) 21-26.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BWA0-0040-0001
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.