Relationships between inherent optical properties in the Baltic Sea for application to the underwater imaging problem

• Autorzy: Levin I. , Darecki M. , Sagan S. , Radomyslskaya T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Statistical relationships between coefficients of light attenuation, scattering and backscattering at wavelength 550 nm derived from series of optical measurements performed in Baltic Sea waters are presented. The relationships were derived primarily to support data analysis from underwater imaging systems. Comparison of these relations with analogous empirical data from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans shows that the two sets of relationships are similar, despite the different water types and the various experimental procedures and instrumentation applied. The apparently universal character of the relationships enables an approximate calculation of other optical properties and subsequently of the contrast, signal/noise ratio, visibility range and spatial resolution of underwater imaging systems based on attenuation coefficients at wavelength 550 nm only.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Baltic Sea; underwater visibility; light attenuation; optical properties

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology ; Elsevier
• Czasopismo: Oceanologia
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: No. 55 (1)
• Strony: 11--26
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Levin I.

autor

Darecki M.

autor

Sagan S.

autor

Radomyslskaya T.

• St. Petersburg Branch of the P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IO RAS), 1 Linia 30, 199053, St. Petersburg, Russia,

Bibliografia

• 1.Aas E., Hokedal J., Sorensen K., 2005, Spectral backscattering coeffcient in coastal waters, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26 (2), 331-343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160410001720324
• 2.Barnard A. H., Pegau W. S., Zaneveld J. R. V., 1998, Global relationships of the inherent optical properties of the oceans, J. Geophys. Res., 103 (C11), 24955-24968, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JC01851
• 3.Dera J., 1992, Marine physics, Elsevier-PWN, Amsterdam, 516 pp.
• 4.Dolin L., Gilbert G., Levin I., Luchinin A., 2006, Theory of imaging through wavy sea surface, Inst. Appl. Phys. (RAS), Nizhniy Novgorod, 171 pp.
• 5.Dolin L. S., Levin I. M., 1991, Reference book on the underwater vision theory, Gidrometeoizdat Press, Leningrad, 230 pp., (in Russian).
• 6.Dolin L. S., Levin I. M., 2004, Underwater optics, The Optics Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, Wiley-VCH Publ., Weinheim, 3237-3271, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/3527600434.eap300.pub2
• 7.Eilola K., 1997, Development of a spring thermocline at temperatures below the temperature of maximum density with application to the Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 102 (C4), 8657-8662, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JC00295
• 8.Fournier G. R., Bonnier D., Forand J. L., Pace P. W., 1993, Range-gated underwater laser imaging system, Opt. Eng., 32 (9), 2185-2190, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.143954
• 9.Gordon H. R., 1989, Dependence of the diffuse reflectance of natural waters on the sun angle, Limnol. Oceanogr., 34 (8), 1484-1489, http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1989.34.8.1484
• 10.Johnson K. S., Berelson W. M., Boss E. S., Chase Z., Claustre H., Emerson S. R., Gruber N., Körtzinger A., Perry M. J., Riser S. C., 2009, Observing biogeochemical cycles at global scales with profiling floats and gliders: prospects for a global array, Oceanography, 22 (3), 216-225, http://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.81
• 11.Kirk J. T. O., 1984, Dependence of relationship between inherent and apparent optical properties of water on solar altitude, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29 (2), 350-356, http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0350
• 12.Kirk J. T. O., 1992, Monte Carlo modeling of the performance of the reflective tube absorption meter, Appl. Optics, 31 (30), 6463-6468, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.006463
• 13.Kopelevich O. V., 1983, Experimental data on the optical properties of seawater, Ocean Opt., 1, Nauka, Moskva, 166-207, (in Russian).
• 14.Kopelevich O. V., Mashtakov Y. L., Rusanov S. Y., 1974, Apparatura i metodika issledovaniya opticheskikh svoistv morskoi vody, gidrozicheskie i gidrooptich- eskie issledovaniya v Atlanticheskom i Tikhom okeanakh, Nauka, Moskva, 97-107.
• 15.Kowalczuk P., 1999, Seasonal variability of yellow substance absorption in the surface layer of the Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (C12), 30047-30058, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900198
• 16.Kowalczuk P., Zabłocka M., Sagan S., Kuliński K., 2010, Fluorescence measured in situ as a proxy of CDOM absorption and DOC concentration in the Baltic Sea, Oceanologia, 52 (3), 431-471, http://dx.doi.org/10.5697/oc.52-3.431
• 17.Lee Z., Carder K. L., Mobley C. D., Steward R. G., Patch J. S., 1999, Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2. Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization, Appl. Opt., 38 (18), 3831-3843, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.740464
• 18.Levin I., Desa Eh., Desa El., Suresh T., Radomyslskaya T., 2001, Can the Secchi depth measurements be used for determination of water inherent optical properties?, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters (ONW-2001), 360-366, I. M. Levin & G. D. Gilbert (eds.), D. S. Rozhdestvensky Opt. Soc., St. Petersburg.
• 19.Levin I., Frantsuzov O., Osadchy V., Radomyslskaya T., Savtchenko V., 2003, The instrument for in situ measurement of attenuation coefficient in coastal waters, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. 'Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters (ONW-2003), I. M. Levin & G. D. Gilbert (eds.), D. S. Rozhdestvensky Opt. Soc., St. Petersburg, 284-288.
• 20.Levin I. M., Kopelevich O. V., 2007, Correlations between the inherent hydrooptical characteristics in the spectral range close to 550 nm, Okeanologiya, 47, (3), 374-379, (in Russian).
• 21.Levin I. M., Radomyslskaya T M., 2007, Secchi disk theory: a reexamination, Proc. SPIE, 6615, Current research on remote sensing, laser probing, and imagery in natural waters, 66150O, 11 pp., http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.740464
• 22.Lundgren B., 1976, Spectral transmittance measurements in the Baltic, Rep. Inst. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, Univ. Copenhagen, 38 pp.
• 23.Mayer L., Li Y., Melvin G., 2002, 3D visualization for pelagic fisheries research and assessment, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 59 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1125
• 24.McKee D., Chami M., Brown I., Sanjuan Calzado V., Doxaran D., Cunningham A., 2009, Role of measurement uncertainties in observed variability in the spectral backscattering ratio: a case study in mineral-rich coastal waters, Appl. Opt., 48 (24), 4663-4675, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.004663
• 25.Mobley C. D., Gentili B., Gordon H. R., Jin Z., Kattawar G. W., Morel A., Reinersman P., Stamnes K., Stavn R. H., 1993, Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields, Appl. Opt., 32 (36), 7884-7504, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.007484
• 26.Morel A., 1988, Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (Case 1 water), J. Geophys. Res., 93 (C9), 10749-10768, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC093iC09p10749
• 27.Morel A., Prieur L., 1977, Analysis of variations in ocean color, Limnol. Oceanogr., 22 (4), 709-722, http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.4.0709
• 28.Petzold T. J., 1972, Volume scattering function for selected ocean waters, Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., San Diego, 79 pp.
• 29.Pope R. M., Fry E. S., 1997, Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements, Appl. Opt., 36 (33), 8710-8723, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.008710
• 30.Prokudina T. M., Pelevin V. N., 1972, Determination of the value of the life parameter of a light quantum from the characteristics of light fields in the sea, Optics Ocean Atmos., Nauka, Leningrad, 157-167, (in Russian).
• 31.Sagan S., 2008, The inherent water optical properties of Baltic waters, Diss. and monogr., 21, Inst. Oceanol. PAS, Sopot, 244 pp., (in Polish).
• 32.Sathyendranath S., Platt T., 1997, Analytic model of ocean color, Appl. Opt., 36 (12), 2620-2629, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.002620
• 33.Shoonmaker J. S., Hammond R. R., Heath A. L., Cleveland J. S., 1994, Numerical model for prediction of sublittoral optical visibility, Proc. SPIE 2258, Ocean Optics XII, 695, 685-702, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.190116
• 34.Smith R. C., Baker K. S., 1981, Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200-800 nm), Appl. Opt., 20 (2), 177-184, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.000177
• 35.Stemmann L., Picheral M., Gorsky G., 2000, Diel variation in the vertical distribution of particulate matter (> 0.15 mm) in the NW Mediterranean Sea investigated with the Underwater Video Profiler, Deep-Sea Res., Pt. I,. 47 (3), 505-531, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(99)00100-4
• 36.Tang X. O., Stewart W. K., Huang H., Gallager S. M., Davis C. S., Vincent L., Marra M., 1998, Automatic plankton image recognition, Artif. Intell. Rev., 12 (1-3), 177-199, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006517211724
• 37.Voipio A. (ed.), 1981, The Baltic Sea, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 418 pp.
• 38.Voss K. J., 1992, A spectral model of the beam attenuation coefficient in the ocean and coastal areas, Limnol. Oceanogr., 37 (3), 501-509, http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0501
• 39.Whitmire A. L., Boss E., Cowles T. J., Pegau W. S., 2007, Spectral variability of the particulate backscattering ratio, Opt. Exp., 15 (11), 7019-7031, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.007019
• 40.Zaneveld J. R. V., Kitchen J. C., Moore C., 1994, The scattering error correction of reflecting-tube absorption meters, Proc. SPIE 2258, Ocean Optics XII, 44, 44-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.190095
• 41.Zaneveld J. R. V., Pegau W., 2003, Robust underwater visibility parameter, Opt.Exp., 11 (23), 2997-3009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.002997
• 42.Zege E. P., Ivanov A. P., Katsev I. L., 1991, Image transfer through a scattering medium, Springer, New York.