PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Analysis of the Grid Sampling Method for Noise Mapping

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The grid method is the most widely used technique for measurement-based noise assessment, and indeed is part of the ISO 1996-2 standard. Nevertheless it has certain disadvantages. The present work is an analysis of the grid method for evaluating noise, firstly in the city of C´aceres and, secondly in two other smaller towns. Using as reference a 200 metre grid study, a study was made of the effect of varying the size and form of the grid on the city’s overall noise value, the percentage of data found to lie above some reference thresholds, and the noise value assigned to a certain zone of the city. The ISO 1996 recommendations of the necessity of new sampling points and the method’s predictive capacity for these new measurements were also analyzed.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
499--514
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Departamento de Fýsica Aplicada, E. Politecnica, Universidad de Extremadura Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 10003 C´aceres, Spain, valentin@unex.es
Bibliografia
  • 1. Barrigón Morillas J.M., Gómez Escobar V., Méndez Sierra J.A., Vılchez Gómez R. (2002), Study of noise in a small Spanish Town, Int. J. Acoust. Vib., 7, 231-237.
  • 2. Barrigón Morillas J.M., Gómez Escobar V., Méndez Sierra J.A., Vılchez Gómez R., Vaquero J.M., Trujillo Carmona J. (2005), A categorization method applied to the study of urban road traffic noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117, 2844-2852.
  • 3. Barrigón Morillas J.M., Gómez Escobar V., Méndez Sierra J.A., Vılchez Gómez R., Carmona del Rıo J., Trujillo Carmona J. (2011), Analysis of the prediction capacity of a categorization method for urban noise assessment, Appl. Acoust., 72, 760-771.
  • 4. Barrigón Morillas J.M., Gómez Escobar V., Rey Gozalo G., Vı큞chez-Gómez R. (2010), Possible relation of noise levels in streets to the population of the municipalities in which they are located, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 128, EL86-EL92.
  • 5. Broderson A.B., Edwards R.G., Hauser W.P., Coakley W.S. (1981), Community noise in twenty Kentucky cities, Noise Control Engineering, 16, 52-63.
  • 6. Brown A.L., Lam K.C. (1987), Urban noise surveys, Appl. Acoust., 20, 23-39.
  • 7. Can A., Leclercq L., Lelong J., Defrance J. (2008), Capturing urban traffic noise dynamics through relevant descriptors, Appl. Acoust., 69, 1270-1280.
  • 8. Chakrabarty D., Santra S.C., Mukherjee A., Roy B., Das P. (1997), Status of road traffic noise in Calcutta metropolis, India, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 943-949.
  • 9. COM (2002), Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise (END), The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Brussels.
  • 10. Garcıa A., Miralles J.L., Garcıa A.M., Sempere M.C. (1990), Community response to environmental noise in Valencia, Environ Int., 16, 533-541.
  • 11. Glaser E.R., Silver C.A. (1979), The use of stratification to improve the design efficiency of community noise surveys, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65, 1467-1473.
  • 12. Martın M.A., Tarrero A., Gonzále J., Machimbarrena M. (2006), Exposure-effect relationships between road traffic noise annoyance and noise cost valuations in Valladolid, Spain, Appl. Acoust., 67, 945-958.
  • 13. ISO 1996-1: 2003 (2003), Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
  • 14. ISO 1996-2: 1987 (1987), Description and measurement of environmental noise. Part 2: Acquisition of data pertinent to land use, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
  • 15. ISO 1996-2: 2007 (2007), Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Part 2: Determination of environmental noise levels, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
  • 16. ISO IEC Guide 98-3 (2008), Uncertainty of measurement - part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995), International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
  • 17. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1986), Report Fighting Noise, OECD Publications, Paris.
  • 18. Piccolo A., Plutino D., Cannistraro G. (2005). Evaluation and analysis of the environmental noise of Messina, Italy, Appl. Acoust., 66, 447-465.
  • 19. Romeu J., Jiménez S., Genescà M., Pàmies T., Capdevilla R. (2006), Spatial sampling for night levels estimation in urban environments, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 791-800.
  • 20. Sahai H., Ageel M.I. (2000), The Analysis of Variance. Fixed, Random and Mixed Models, Birkhäuser, Boston.
  • 21. Sanchıs Francés R., Segura Garcıa J., Navarro Camba E.A., Garcıa Rodrıguez A. (2000), Estudio de ruido ambiental y sus efectos en una pequeña ciudad: Banyeres de Mariola, Revista de Acustica, 31, 27-31.
  • 22. Sommerhoff J., Recuero M., Su큑rez E. (2004), Community noise survey of the city of Valdivia, Chile, Appl. Acoust., 65, 643-656.
  • 23. World Health Organization (WHO) (2000), Guidelines for Community Noise, Berglund B., Lindvall T., Schwela D.H. and Goh K.T. [Eds.], WHO, Geneva.
  • 24. Zannin P.H., Diniz F.B., Barbosa W.A. (2002), Environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil, Appl. Acoust., 63, 351-358.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS8-0026-0075
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.