PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Study of the Acoustic Suitability of an Open Plan Office Based on STI and DL2 Simulations

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Many business offices around the world are organized as open plan offices. Therefore, studies about the acoustic comfort of the people who work in them have become increasingly important. The focus of this work is the acoustic evaluation of an open plan office combining several architectural characteristics and levels of ambient noise. This evaluation was performed through a computational model calibrated from a real office. The rate of spatial decay of sound pressure levels per distance doubling (DL2) and the speech transmission index (STI) were simulated for the acoustic evaluation of the office, allowing for the determination of the radius of distraction (rD). These parameters were simulated for 6 situations using different floor and ceiling covering materials and inserting or withdrawing screens between workstations. In addition, STI and rD were simulated under two conditions of ambient noise. The results indicated that the DL2 and rD are adequate acoustic parameters for the acoustic evaluation and improvement of an open plan office. The DL2 was strongly influenced by the presence or absence of screens between workstations and by the ceiling covering material. The rD was more sensitive to changes in ambient noise.
Rocznik
Strony
237--243
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Laboratory of Environmental and Industrial Acoustics and Acoustic Comfort – LAAICA Federal University of Parana, Centro Politecnico s/n 81540-420, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, zannin@ufpr.br
Bibliografia
  • 1. Asselineau M. (2007), Integration of Furnishing in Open Plan Office Design: Case Studies, [in:] International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, in CD-ROM.
  • 2. Augustynska D., Kaczmarska A., Mikulski W., Radosz J. (2010), Assessment of Teachers' Exposure to Noise in Selected Primary Schools, Archives of Acoustics, 35, 4, 521-545.
  • 3. Bradley J.S. (2007), Designing and Assessing Speech Privacy in Open-plan Offices, [in:] International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, in CD-ROM.
  • 4. Brachmanski S. (2007), Automation of the logatom intelligibility measurements in rooms, Archives of Acoustics, 32, 4, 159-164.
  • 5. Brachmanski S. (2008), Objective Measure for Assessment of Speech Quality in Rooms, Archives of Acoustics, 33, 4, 177-182.
  • 6. Chigot P. (2007), Alternative Room Acoustic Descriptors for Open Offices - Progresses in Standardization, [in:] International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid. United Kindom: Institute of Acoustics, CD-ROM.
  • 7. Christensen C.L. (2003), Odeon Room Acoustics Program: Version 7.0, Industrial, Auditorium and Combined Editions, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
  • 8. Duffy F. (1980), Oficinas, H. Blume Ediciones, Madrid.
  • 9. Egan M.D. (1988), Architectural Acoustics, McGraw Hill, New York.
  • 10. Golas A., Suder-Debska K. (2009), Analysis of Dome Home Hall Theatre Acoustic Field, Archives of Acoustics, 34, 3, 273-293.
  • 11. Harris CM. (1994), Noise Control in Buildings: A Practical Guide for Architects and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, USA.
  • 12. Hongisto V., Keranen J., Larm P. (2004), Simple model for acoustical design of open-plan offices, Acta Acustica, 90, 481-495.
  • 13. Hongisto V., Virjonen P., Ker쮉nen J. (2007), Determination of Acoustic Conditions in Open Offices and Suggestions for Acoustic Classification, [in:] International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, in CD-ROM.
  • 14. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 60268-16 (2003), Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index, Switzerland.
  • 15. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14257 (2001), Acoustics - Measurement and parametric description of spatial sound distribution curves in workrooms for evaluation of their acoustical performance, Switzerland.
  • 16. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3382-2 (2008), Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters - Part 2: Reverberation time in ordinary rooms, Switzerland.
  • 17. Kjellberg A., Landström U., Tesarz M., Söderberg L., Akerlund E. (1996), The Effects of Nonphysical Noise Characteristics, Ongoing Task and Noise Sensitivity on Annoyance and Distraction due to Noise at Work, J. of Environmental Psychology, 16, 2,123-136.
  • 18. Nilsson E., Hellstr쮗m B., Berthelsen B. (2008), Room acoustical measures for open plan spaces, Proceedings of Acoustics Paris, 543-547.
  • 19. Ondet A.M., Suer J. (1995), Development and validation of a criterion for assessing the acoustic performance of industrial rooms, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97, 3, 1727-1731.
  • 20. Passero C.R.M, Zannin P.H.T. (2010), Statistical comparison of reverberation times measured by the integrated impulse response and interrupted noise methods, computationally simulated with ODEON software, and calculated by Sabine, Eyring and Arau-Puchades' formulas, Applied Acoustics, 71, 12, 1204-1210.
  • 21. Pejtersen J., Allermann L., Kristensen T.S., Poulsen O.M. (2006), Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices, Indoor Air, 16, 5, 392-401.
  • 22. Rindel J.H. (2000), The use of computer modeling in room acoustics, J. of Vibroengineering, 3, 4, 219-224.
  • 23. Van Der Voordt T.J.M. (2004), Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces, J. of Corporate Real Estate, 6, 2, 133-148.
  • 24. Virjonen P., Keränen J., Hongisto V. (2009), Determination of acoustical conditions in open-plan offices: proposal for new measurement method and target values, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 95, 279-290.
  • 25. Zannin P.H.T., Marcon C.R. (2007), Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms, Applied Ergonomics, 38, 675-68.
  • 26. Zannin P.H.T., Passero C.R.M., Sant'Ana D.Q. (2009), Acoustic Design of Enclosed Spaces, [in:] Ergonomics: Design, Integration and Implementation, Brinkerhoff B. [Ed.], Nova Science Publishers, New York.
  • 27. Zannin P.H., Zwirtes D.P. (2009), Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools, Applied Acoustics, 70, 626-635.
  • 28. Zannin P.H.T., Passero C.R.M., Sant'Ana D.Q., Bunn F., Fiedler P.E.K., Ferreira A.M.C. (2011), Classrooms Acoustics: Measurements, Simulations and Applications, [in:] Classrooms: Management, Effectiveness and Challenges, Rebecca J. Newley [Ed.], Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS8-0022-0013
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.