Powiadomienia systemowe
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
- Sesja wygasła!
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This study sought to evaluate the effect of speech intensity on performance of the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) and Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) presented in noise. Fourteen normally hearing listeners performed both tests in 65 dB A white background noise. Speech intensity varied while background noise remained constant to form speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of -18, -15, -12, -9, and -6 dB. Results showed that CAT recognition scores were significantly higher than MRT scores at the same SNRs; how- ever, the scores from both tests were highly correlated and their relationship for the SNRs tested can be expressed by a simple linear function. The concept of CAT can be easily ported to other languages for testing speech communication under adverse listening conditions
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
199--203
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 15 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
- Department of Management, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University 1601 E. Market Street, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, USA, mcbride@ncat.edu
Bibliografia
- 1. Blue M., Ntuen C., Letowski T. (2004), Speech intelligibility of the callsign acquisition test in a quiet environment, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 10, 179-189.
- 2. Blue M., Ntuen C., Letowski T. (2010), Speech intelligibility measured with shortened versions of callsign acquisition test (CAT) lists, Applied Ergonomics, 41, 291-294.
- 3. Fairbanks G. (1958), Test of phonemic difference:The rhyme test, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 596-600.
- 4. House A., Williams C., Hecker M., Kryter K. (1965), Articulation testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158-166.
- 5. Howes D.H. (1957), On the relation between intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296-303.
- 6. Letowski T., Karsh R., Vause N., Shilling R., Ballas J., Brungart D., McKinley R. (2001), Human factors military lexicon: Auditory displays, ARL Technical Report (ARL-TR-2526), U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD.
- 7. Morton J. (1969), Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
- 8. Nickerson J.F., Miller A.W. Jr., Shyne N.A. (1960), A comparison of five articulation tests, U.S. Air Force Research and Development Command, Report No. RADC-TR-60-71, Griffiss AFB (NY): U.S. Air Force.
- 9. Rao M., Letowski T. (2003), Speech intelligibility of the call sign acquisition test (CAT) for army communication systems, Audio Engineering Society 114th Convention, Paper 5836, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 10. Rao M., Letowski T. (2006), Callsign acquisition test (CAT): Speech intelligibility in noise, Ear and Hearing, 27, 120-128.
- 11. Schultz M.C. (1964), Word familiarity influences in speech discrimination, Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 7, 395-400.
- 12. Studebaker G.A. (1985), A "rationalized" arcsine transform, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455-462.
- 13. Studebaker G.A., Sherbescoe R.L., McDaniel D.M., Gwaltney C.A. (1999), Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2431-2444.
- 14. Williams C.E., Hecker H.L. (1968), Relation between intelligibility scores on four test methods and three types of speech distortion, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1002-1006.
- 15. Zera J. (2004), Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure, Speech Communication, 42, 313-328
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS8-0022-0008