Rough Truth Degrees of Formulas and Approximate Reasoning in Rough Logic

• Autorzy: She Y. , He X. , Wang G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A propositional logic PRL for rough sets was proposed in [1]. In this paper, we initially introduce the concepts of rough (upper, lower) truth degrees on the set of formulas in PRL. Then, by grading the rough equality relations, we propose the concepts of rough (upper, lower) similarity degree. Finally, three different pseudo-metrics on the set of rough formulas are obtained, and thus an approximate reasoning mechanism is established

Słowa kluczowe

EN

rough truth degree; rough similarity degree; rough pseudo-metric; approximate reasoning

• Wydawca: IOS Press
• Czasopismo: Fundamenta Informaticae
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 107, nr 1
• Strony: 67--83
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

She Y.

autor

He X.

autor

Wang G.

• College of Science, Xi’an Shiyou University Xi’an , 710065, China,

Bibliografia

• [1] Banerjee, M.: Rough sets through algebraic logic. Fundamenta Informaticae, 32: 213-220, 1997.
• [2] Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and InformationSciences 11(5): 341-356, 1982.
• [3] Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets−T heoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Knowledge academic publishers, 1991.
• [4] Chen, Y., Yao, Y.: A multiview approach for intelligent data analysis based on data operators. Information Sciences, 178(1): 1-20, 2008.
• [5] Herbert, J., Yao, J.: Rough set model selection for practical decision making. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD, 203-207, 2007.
• [6] Grzymala-Busse, J.: Mining numerical data- A rough set approach. T ransactions on Rough Sets, XI 5946: 1-13, 2010.
• [7] Pawlak, Z.: Rough logic. Bull. Polish Acad. Sc. (T ech. Sc.), 35: 253-258, 1987.
• [8] Orlowska, E.: Kripke semantics for knowledge representation logics. Studia Logica, XLIX: 255-272, 1990.
• [9] Vakarelov, D.: A modal logic for similarity relations in Pawlak knowledge representaion systems. Fundamenta Informaticae, 15: 61-79, 1991.
• [10] Vakarelov, D.: Modal logics for knowledge representation systems. T heoretical Computer Science, 90: 433-456, 1991.
• [11] Duentsch, I.: A logic for rough sets. T heoretical Computer Science, 179: 427-436, 1997.
• [12] Chakrabotry,M.: Rough consequence. Bull. Polish Acad. Sc.(Math.), 41(4): 299-304, 1993.
• [13] Dai, J.: Logic for rough sets with rough double stone algebraic semantics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3641: 141-148, 2005.
• [14] Banerjee, M.: Logic for rough truth. Fundamenta Informaticae, 71(2-3): 139-151, 2006.
• [15] Pagliani, P., Chakraborty,M. A geometry of approximation. Rough set theory : logic, algebra and topology of conceptual patterns. Springer, 2008.
• [16] Banerjee, M.: Propositional logic from rough set theory. T ransactions on Rough Sets, VI: 1-25, 2007.
• [17] Wang, G., Zhou. H.: Introduction to mathematical logic and resolution principle. Science Press, Beijing& Alpha Science International Limited, Oxford, U.K, 2009.
• [18] Wang, G., Zhou, H.: Quantitative logic. Information Sciences, 179: 226-247, 2009.
• [19] Pavelka, J.: On fuzzy logic I, II, III, Zeitschr. Math. Logik Grund. d. Math. 25: 45-72, 119-134, 447-464, 1979.
• [20] Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1: 3-28, 1978.
• [21] Hajek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1998.
• [22] Zadeh, L.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, parts 1-3. Inform. Sci., 8: 199-249, 301-357; 9: 43-80, 1975.
• [23] Graham, I., Jones, L.: Expert systems − knowledge, uncertainty and decision. Chapman and Hall Computing, London, 1998.
• [24] Halmos, P.: Measure theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1955.
• [25] Kelley, J.: General topology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1955.
• [26] Chakraborty,M., Banerjee, M.: Rough consequence. Bull. Polish Acad., 41(4): 299-304, 1993.
• [27] Chakraborty,M.: Graded consequence: further studies. Journal of AppliedNon−classical Logic, 5:227-237, 1994.
• [28] Banerjee,M.: Rough truth, consequence, consistency and belief revision. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3066:95-102, 2004.
• [29] Munino, D.: A graded inference approach based on infinite-valued Łukasiewicz semantics. ISMV L, 252-257, 2010.