Perseus. Software for Analyzing Persuasion Process

• Autorzy: Budzyńska K. , Kacprzak M. , Rembelski P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the paper is to present the software tool Perseus and show how it can be used to examine multi-agent systems where the ability to persuade is specified. Especially we want to study the issues such as: what arguments individuals use to successfully convince others, what type of a persuader guarantees a victory etc. This work describes implementation of the tool and discusses what questions about persuasion process Perseus can answer and how it is done.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Perseus system

• Wydawca: IOS Press
• Czasopismo: Fundamenta Informaticae
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 93, nr 1-3
• Strony: 65--79
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Budzyńska K.

autor

Kacprzak M.

autor

Rembelski P.

• Institute of Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszy´nski University in Warsaw, Dewajtis 5, 01-815 Warsaw, Poland,,

Bibliografia

• [1] Budzyńska, K., Kacprzak, M.: A Logic for Reasoning about Persuasion, Fundamenta Informaticae, 85, 2008, 51-65.
• [2] Budzyńska, K., Kacprzak, M., Rembelski, P.: Modeling Persuasiveness: change of uncertainty through agents' interactions, Proc. of COMMA, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2008.
• [3] Cantillon, E., Pesendorfer,M.: Combinatorial Auctions, MIT Press, 2006.
• [4] Feldmann, R., Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Monien, B., Rode, M.: Selfish Routing in Non-Cooperative Networks: A Survey., Proc. of the 28th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS'03), 2003.
• [5] Gaertner, D., Toni, F.: CaSAPI - a system for credulous and sceptical argumentation, Proc. of First International Workshop on Argumentation and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Arizona, USA, 2007.
• [6] Garcia, A., Gollapally, D., Tarau, P., Simari, G.: Deliberative StockMarket Agents using Jinni and Defeasible Logic Programming, Proc. of ESAW'00 Engineering Societies in the Agents' World, Workshop of ECAI, 2000.
• [7] van Gelder, T. J.: ArgumentMappingwith Reason!Able, The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 2002, 85-90.
• [8] Gordon, T. F.: Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules, Proc. of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007.
• [9] Gradwell, P., Padget, J.: Distributed combinatorial resource scheduling, Proc. of AAMAS Workshop on Smart Grid Technologies SGT'2005, 2005.
• [10] Hussain, A., Toni, F.: Bilateral agent negotiation with information-seeking, Proc. of the 5th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, 2007.
• [11] Jonker, G. M., Meyer, J. J., Dignum, F.: Market mechanisms in airport traffic control, Proc. of the Second European Workshop on Multiagent Systems EUMAS'2004, 2004.
• [12] Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence, 104(1-2), 1998, 1-69.
• [13] Lemaître, M., Verfaillie, G., Bataille, H. F. J. L. N., Lachiver, J. M.: Equitable allocation of earth observing satellites resources, Proc. of the 5th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium ODAS'2003, 2003.
• 14] Lemaître, M., Verfaillie, G., Bataille, N.: Exploiting a Common Property Resource under a Fairness Constraint: a Case Study, Proc. of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJACI'1999,Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999.
• [15] Parunak, H. V. D.: Applications of distributed artificial intelligence in industry, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1996.
• [16] Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., Reed, C.: Laying the Foundations for a World Wide Argument Web, Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15), 2007, 897-921.
• [17] Reed, C. A., Rowe, G.W. A.: Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation, International Journal of AI Tools, 13(4), 2004, 961-980.
• [18] Rolf, B., Magnusson, C.: Developing the art of argumentation. A software approach., Proc. of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argument (ISSA'02) SicSat, 2002.
• [19] Sousa, P., Ramos, C., Neves, J.: The Fabricare scheduling prototype suite: Agent interaction and knowledge base, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14(5), 2003, 441-455.
• [20] Verheij, B.: Virtual Arguments.On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2005.
• [21] Walton, D. N., Krabbe, E. C. W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of N.Y. Press, 1995.