PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The different uses of sea space in Polish Marine Areas: is conflict inevitable?

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Seven major types of sea space use (Nature Protection Measures, Fisheries Exploitation, Geological Exploitation, Recreation, Large Infrastructures, Navigation, Military uses) in the Polish Marine Areas are presented in terms of how much space is used (km2) for each use and the degree of overlap among the different uses. The greatest degree of conflict is noted with regard to Nature Protection (which overlaps with 60% of the areas used for Recreation and Geological Exploitation), and Fisheries Exploitation (which overlaps with 60% of the areas used for Nature Protection, Recreation, Infrastructure and Navigation). On the other hand, Fisheries Exploitation areas are the least disturbed by other users, and its major competitor is Nature Protection, which claims 20% of the areas used by fisheries. A GIS-based map that illustrates the degree of conflict is included, and the authors suggest participatory management as the proper way to minimize conflicts over sea space use and to promote the effective protection of natural resources.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
513--530
Opis fizyczny
bibliogr. 46 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
autor
autor
Bibliografia
  • 1.Agardy T., 2000, Information needs for marine protected areas: Scientific and societal, B. Mar. Sci., 66 (3), 875-888.
  • 2.Andrulewicz E., Napierska D., Otremba Z., 2003, The environmental effects of installation and functioning of submarine SwePol Link HVDC transmission line: a case study of the Polish Marine Area of the Baltic Sea, J. Sea Res., 49, 337-345.
  • 3.Andrulewicz E., Otremba Z., Kamińska K., 2010, Ongoing technical activities and nature conservation measures in maritime spatial planning within the Polish Marine Areas, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., (in press).
  • 4.Beukema J. J., Dekker R., 2005, Decline of recruitment success in cockles and other bivalves in the Wadden Sea: possible role of climate change, predation on postlarvae and fisheries, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 287, 149-167.
  • 5.Buck B.H., Krause G., Rosenthal H., 2004, Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore comanagement and legal constraints, Ocean Coast. Manage., 47 (3-4), 95-122.
  • 6.Dimech M., Darmanin M., Smith I.P., Kaiser M. J., Schembri P. J., 2009, Fishers' perception of a 35-year old exclusive Fisheries Management Zone, Biol. Conserv., 142 (11), 2691-2702.
  • 7.Douvere F., 2008, The role of marine spatial planning in implementing ecosystem-based, sea use management, Mar. Policy, 32 (5), 762-771.
  • 8.Douvere F., Ehler C.N., 2009, New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning, J. Environ. Manage., 90 (1), 77-88.
  • 9.Durinck J., Skov H., Jensen F.P., Pihl S., 1994, Important marine areas for wintering birds in the Baltic Sea, Ornis Consult Rep., Copenhagen.
  • 10.Fanshawe S., Van Blaricom G.R., Shelly A.A., 2003, Restored top carnivores as detriments to the performance of marine protected areas intended for fishery sustainability: A case study with red abalones and sea otters, Conserv. Biol., 17 (1), 273-283.
  • 11.Fock H.O., 2008, Fisheries in the context of marine spatial planning: Defining principal areas for fisheries in the German EEZ, Mar. Policy, 32 (4), 728-739.
  • 12.Geological Survey, 2010, http://www.pgi.gov.pl/index.php?option=com\ content\&task=view\&id=1118\&Itemid=597.
  • 13.Graham I.M., Harris R.N., Denny B., Fowden D., Pullan D., 2009, Testing the effectiveness of an acoustic deterrent device for excluding seals from Atlantic salmon rivers in Scotland, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66 (5), 860-864.
  • 14.Guillemot N., Leopold M., Cuif M., Chabanet P., 2009, Characterization and management of informal fisheries confronted with socio-economic changes in New Caledonia (South Pacific), Fish. Res., 98 (1-3), 51-61.
  • 15.Hansson S., Hjerne O., Harvey C., Kitchell J.F., Cox S.P., Essington T.E., 2007, Managing Baltic Sea fisheries under contrasting production and predation regimes: Ecosystem model analyses, AMBIO, 36 (2-3), 265-271.
  • 16.HELCOM, 2007, Climate change in the Baltic Sea area. Thematic Assessment in 2007, Baltic Sea Environ. Proc. No. 111, 50 pp.
  • 17.Humborg C., Morth C.M., Sundbom M., Wulff F., 2007, Riverine transport of biogenic elements to the Baltic Sea - past and possible future perspectives, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Disc., 11 (5), 1095-1131.
  • 18.Jablonski S., Filet M., 2008, Coastal management in Brazil - A political riddle, Ocean Coast. Manage., 51 (7), 536-543.
  • 19.Jansson A., Folke C., Langaas S., 1998, Quantifying the nitrogen retention capacity of natural wetlands in the large-scale drainage basin of the Baltic Sea, Landscape Ecol., 13 (4), 249-262.
  • 20.Jegliński W., Kramarska R., Uścinowicz S., Zachowicz J., 2009, Valorisation of the sea bottom, pp. 94-95 , [in:] Atlas of Polish marine areas bottom habitats, (auth. coll.), Broker Innowacji, Gdynia, 177 pp., (in Polish).
  • 21.Jones P. J. S., 2001, Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground, Rev. Fish. Biol. Fisher., 11 (3), 197-216.
  • 22.Karlsson O., Hiby L., Lundberg T., Jussi M., Jussi I., Helander B., 2005, Photoidentification, site fidelity, and movement of female gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) between haul-outs in the Baltic Sea, AMBIO, 34 (8), 628-634.
  • 23.Krebs C. J., 1994, Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, Harper Collins College Publ., New York, 722 pp.
  • 24.Larkin P.A., 1996, Concepts and issues in marine ecosystem management, Rev. Fish. Biol. Fisher., 6 (2), 139-164.
  • 25.Larsen J., Guillemette M., 2007, Effects of wind turbines on flight behaviour of wintering common eiders: implications for habitat use and collision risk, J. Appl. Ecol., 44 (3), 516-522.
  • 26.Levin P. S., Kaplan I., Grober-Dunsmore R., Chittaro P.M., Oyamada S., Andrews K., Mangel M., 2009, A framework for assessing the biodiversity and fishery aspects of marine reserves, J. Appl. Ecol., 46 (4), 735-742.
  • 27.Liu J.H., Hills P., 1997, Environmental planning, biodiversity and the development process: The case of Hong Kong's Chinese white dolphins, J. Environ. Manage., 50 (4), 351-367.
  • 28.Lunney D., Pressey B., Archer M., Hand S., Godthelp H., Curtin A., 1997, Integrating ecology and economics: Illustrating the need to resolve the conflicts of space and time, Ecol. Econ., 23 (2), 135-143.
  • 29.Matthiopoulos J., Smout S., Winship A. J., Thompson D., Boyd I. L., Harwood J., 2008, Getting beneath the surface of marine mammal - fisheries competition, Mammal Rev., 38 (2-3), 167-188.
  • 30.Meissner W., Staszewski A., Ziołkowski M., 2001, Śmiertelność ptakow wodnych na polskim wybrzeżu Bałtyku w sezonie 1998/1999, Not. Orn., 42 (1), 56-62.
  • 31.Meissner W., Typiak J., Kośmicki A., Bzoma S., 2009, Liczebność ptakow wodnych na Zatoce Gdańskiej w okresie maj 2007-kwiecień 2008, Not. Orn., 50 (1), 65-72.
  • 32.Olsson O., Fransson T., Larsson K., 1999, Post-fledging migration of common murres Uria aalge in the Baltic Sea: management implications, Ecography, 22 (3), 233-239.
  • 33.Otremba Z., Andrulewicz E., 2008, Environmental concerns related to existing and planned technical installations in the Baltic Sea, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 17 (2), 173-179.
  • 34.Pedersen S.A., Push C., Sell A. L., Bottcher U., Rogers S. I., Skold M., Skov H., Podolska M., Piet G. J., Rice J.C., Fock H., Krause J., 2009, Natura 2000 sites and fisheries in German offshore waters, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66 (1), 155-169.
  • 35.Ropelewski A., 1952, Ssaki Bałtyku, Zak. Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Krakow, 76 pp.
  • 36.Rőnnbäck P., Kautsky N., Pihl L., Troell M., Soerqvist T., Wennhage H., 2007, Ecosystem goods and services from Swedish coastal habitats: Identification, valuation, and implications of ecosystem shifts, AMBIO, 36 (7), 534-544.
  • 37.Samples K.C., 1989, Assessing recreational and commercial conflicts over artificial fishery habitat use: theory and practice, B. Mar. Sci., 44 (2), 844-852.
  • 38.Sjoberg M., Ball J.P., 2000, Grey seal, Halichoerus grypus, habitat selection around haulout sites in the Baltic Sea: bathymetry or central-place foraging?, Can. J. Zool., 78 (9), 1661-1667.
  • 39.Skora K.E., Kuklik I., 2009, Marine mammals, pp. 40-43, [in:] Atlas of Polish marine areas bottom habitats, (auth. coll.), Broker Innowacji, Gdynia, 177 pp., (in Polish).
  • 40.Stempniewicz L., 1994, Marine birds drowning in fishing nets in the Gulf of Gdańsk (southern Baltic): numbers, species composition, age and sex structure, Ornis Svecica, 4 (2-3), 123-132.
  • 41.Szefler K., Furmańczyk K., 2007, Zagospodarowanie i przestrzenne aspekty rozwoju strefy przybrzeżnej Bałtyku, zarówno strefy wód terytorialnych (12 milowej) jak i wyłącznej strefy ekonomicznej (EEZ), Gdańsk, http://www.mrr.gov.pl/Rozwoj+przestrzenny/Polska+polityka+przestrzenna/Prace+nad+KPZK+2008-2033/.
  • 42.Varjopuro R., Sahivirta E., Makinen T., Helminen H., 2000, Regulation and monitoring of marine aquaculture in Finland, J. Appl. Ichthyol., 16 (4-5), 148-156.
  • 43.Vieno N., Tuhkanenand T., Kronberg L., 2007, Elimination of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in Finland, Water Res., 41 (5), 1001-1012.
  • 44.Węsławski J.M., Warzocha J., Wiktor J., Urbański J., Bradtke K., Kryla L., Tatarek A., Kotwicki L., Piwowarczyk J., 2009, Biological valorisation of the southern Baltic Sea (Polish Exclusive Economic Zone), Oceanologia, 51 (3), 415-435.
  • 45.Wilson J.C., Elliot M., 2009, The habitat creation potential of offshore wind farms, Wind Energy, 12 (2), 203-212.
  • 46.Zaucha J., Jakubowska P. (eds.), 2008, Examples of national cases of sea spatial conflicts and potentials in the BSR, MRR, Warszawa.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS8-0003-0018
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.