Multiple criteria evaluation of the mass transit systems in european cities

• Autorzy: Fierek S. , Żak J. , Solecka K. , Kruszyński M.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wielokryterialna ocena systemów transportu publicznego w miastach europejskich

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents the methodology of evaluating diversified mass transit systems (MTS-s), operating in different European cities. The evaluation of MTS-s is formulated as a multiple criteria ranking problem and the methodology of Multiple Criteria Decision Making / Aiding (MCDM/A) is applied to solve it. The authors carry out and present all phases of the solution procedure of the multiple criteria decision problem (DP). Thus, they define the variants and the consistent family of criteria. They model the decision makers’ (DMs’) preferences, including their sensitivity and perception of the importance of criteria. They review and analyze a spectrum of MCDM/A ranking methods, including: Electre III, Oreste, AHP, UTA, and finally select the most appropriate ones that fit best the specific character of the public transportation systems’ evaluation process. They run computational experiments resulting in the generation of the final rankings of the MTS-s.

PL

W pracy przedstawiono metodykę oceny systemów transportu publicznego (STP), działających w różnych miastach europejskich. Problem oceny STP jest sformułowany jako wielokryterialny problem rankingowy. Do rozwiązywania problemu zastosowano metodykę wielokryterialnego wspomagania decyzji (WWD). Autorzy przedstawili wszystkie etapy procedury rozwiązywania wielokryterialnych problemów decyzyjnych, określili warianty, zdefiniowali spójną rodzinę kryteriów oraz zamodelowali preferencje decydenta z uwzględnieniem jego wrażliwości oraz ważności kryteriów. Autorzy dokonali. przeglądu i analizy szeregu wielokryterialnych metod rankingowych, w tym: Electre III, AHP, Oreste, UTA i ostatecznie dokonali wyboru najbardziej odpowiednich metod WWD, które najlepiej pasują do specyfiki problemu oceny systemów transportu publicznego. W wyniku eksperymentów obliczeniowych uzyskano uszeregowanie końcowe wariantów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multiple criteria decision making/aiding; evaluation of mass transit systems; ranking methods

PL

wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji; ocena transportu publicznego; metody rankingowe

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: nr 2
• Opis fizyczny: Pełny tekst na CD, Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Fierek S.

autor

Żak J.

autor

Solecka K.

autor

Kruszyński M.

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Machines and Transportation

Bibliografia

• [1] Benayoun R., Montgolfier J.,: Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: STEP Method (STEM). Mathematical Programming, Vol. 1, 1971, pp. 366-375.
• [2] Besson M.: Rang moyen et agrégation de classements. Revue Française d'Automatique,d'Informatique et de Recherche Operationnelle, 1975.
• [3] Brans, J., Mareschal B., Vincke P.: PROMETHEE - A New Family of Outranking Methods in Multicriteria Analysis. Brans J. (Ed.) Operations Research. 1984.
• [4] Caliskan, N.: A Decision Support Approach for the Evaluation of Transport Investment Alternative. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(3)., 2006, pp. 1696-1704
• [5] Ceder, A.: Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 640 p. 2007.
• [6] Chang, Y., Shyu T.: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Model to Evaluate the Privatization of the Public Bus Operations. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(1), 1995, pp. 63-79
• [7] Climaco, J. (Ed.): Multicriteria Analysis, Springer 1997.
• [8] Ergun, M., Iyinam S., Iyinam A.: An Assessment of Transportation Alternatives for Istanbul Metropolitan City for Year 2000. Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the Euro Working Group Transportation, Rome, September 11-14, 2000, pp. 183-190
• [9] Frederic, A., Patrick H.: Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies. Hershey, New York, 2008.
• [10] Gercek, H., Karpak B., Kilincaslan T.: A Multiple Criteria Approach for the Evaluation of the Rail Transit Networks in Istanbul. Presentation of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, July 12-17, 1998.
• [11] Gomes, L.: Multicriteria Ranking of Urban Transportation System Alternatives. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 23(1), 1989, pp. 53-66.
• [12] Guitouni A., Martel J.: Tentative Guidelines to Help Chosing an Appropriate MCDA method. EJOR, Vol. 109, No. 2, 1998, pp. 501-521.
• [13] Haimes Y., Hall W.: Multiobjectives in Water Resources Systems Analysis: The SWT Method. Water Resources Research, Vol. 10, 1975, pp. 615-624.
• [14] Hills, P., Mackay B., Hooper W. (Eds.): Transport in the Urban Environment, The Institution of Highways and Transportation, London, 1997.
• [15] Hsu, T.: Public Transportation System Project Evaluation: A Fuzzy Delphi AHP. Presentation of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, 1998.
• [16] Jacquet - Lagreze E., Siskos J.: Assessing a Set of Additive Utility Functions for Multicriteria Decision Making: the UTA Method. European Journal of Operational Reseach, Vol.10, No.2, 1982, pp.151-164.
• [17] Keeney R. And H. Raiffa: Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
• [18] Kenworthy J. And E. Laube: The Millennium Cities Database for Sustainable Transport. International Union (Association) of Public Transport, Brussels, 2001.
• [19] Matarazzo B.: Multicriterion Analysis of Preferences by Means of Pairwise Actions and Criterion Comparisons, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol.18, No.2., 1986.
• [20] Pastijn H., Leysen J.: Constructing an Outranking Relation with ORESTE. Mathemat. Comput. Modelling, Vol. 12, No 10/11, 1989.
• [21] Prospects. EU Research Project - Final Report: Procedures for Recommending Optimal Sustainable Planning of European City Transport Systems, Leeds 2003.
• [22] Quattro. Project of the European Union (Working Papers), Brussels 1997.
• [23] Roy, B.: Methodologie Multicritere d'Aide a la Decision. Economica, Paris 1985.
• [24] Roy, B.: Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method. Transportation Research, 16A(4), 1982, pp. 301-312.
• [25] Roy, B.: The outranking Approach and the Foundations of Electre methods. IN: Readings in MCDA. Bana e Costa C. (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1990.
• [26] Rudnicki, A.: Quality in Urban Public Transportation. SITK, Krakow 1990.
• [27] Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York 1980.
• [28] Saaty, T.: Transport Planning with Multiple Criteria: The AHP Applications and Progress Review. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 1995, pp. 81-126.
• [29] Skalka, J., Bouyssou D., Bernabeu Y.: ELECTRE III et IV. Aspects methodologiques et guide d'utilisatio. LAMSADE, 25, Paris 1986.
• [30] Steuer R.: An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Procedure. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences.1977.
• [31] Tabucanon, M., Lee H.: Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Transportation System Improvement Projects: the Case of Korea. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(1), 1995, pp. 127-143.
• [32] Tzeng, G., Shiau T.: Multiple Objective Programming for Bus Operation: A Case Study for Taipei City. Transportation Research B (22/23), 1988, pp. 195-206.
• [33] Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Decision - Aid. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1992.
• [34] Vuchic V.: Urban Transit. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 2005.
• [35] Webb, M.: Jane's Urban Transport Systems. 23rd-Edition 2004-2005. Sentinel House, Jane's Information Group. Coulsdon.
• [36] Żak J., Fierek S.: Design and Evaluation of Alternative Solutions for an Integrated Urban Transportation System. Proceedings of the World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley, June 24-28, 2007 (WCTR'2007 - CD Proceedings).
• [37] Żak J.: The Methodology of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Aiding in Public Transportation. Journal Of Advanced Transportation. 2011; 45:1-20
• [38] Żak, J., Thiel T.: Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the Development Scenarios of the Mass Transit System. IN: Park C. - H., Cho J., Oh J., Hayashi Y., Viegas J. (red.): CD - Selected Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul 2001.
• [39] Żak, J.: The Comparison of Multiobjective Ranking Methods Applied to Solve the Mass Transit Systems' Decision Problems. Proceedings of the 10th Jubilee Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, Poznan, September 13-16, 2005, Poznan University of Technology Publishers, Poznan, pp. 184-193.
• [40] Żak, J.: The Methodology of Multiple-Criteria Decision Making in the Optimization of an Urban Transportation System: Case Study of Poznan City in Poland. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1990, pp. 571-590.