PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Public ownership or private equity?

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The superior returns achieved by private equity investors in recent years has attracted greater flows of capital from institutional investors and significantly increased the importance of this sector of the UK and European economy. Against a backdrop of intense debate about the role of private equity, generated by the increasing size of deals and high levels of leverage, this paper reviews the pros and cons of this form of corporate organisation. According to its advocates, private equity is a means of making companies more efficient. Its detractors, on the other hand, claim that private equity firms lack transparency in comparison to their publicly listed counterparts and that they often generate returns from asset stripping rather than from genuine operational improvements. We review both sides of the argument and consider the limited empirical evidence about the relative merits of public and private equity.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Accounting and Finance University of Stirling
Bibliografia
  • 1. Burrough B., Helyar J.: Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco. Harper Business, 1990.
  • 2. Cao J., Lerner J.: The Success of Leveraged Buyouts. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12626.
  • 3. (available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/wl2626.pdfaccessed 09 March 2007).
  • 4. Elliott L.: Trade unions attack 'corporate greed' of private equity firms. "The Guardian, January" 26, 2007.
  • 5. Froud J., Williams K.: Private equity and the culture of value extraction. CRESC Working Paper No. 3, The University of Manchester, February 2007.
  • 6. Financial Services Authority, "Private Equity: A Discussion of Risk and Regulatory Engagement", Discussion Paper, November 2006. (available at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/discussion/dp06_06.pdf accessed 09 March 2007).
  • 7. HM Treasury, 'Speech by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Ed Balls MP, to the London Buisiness School', 8 March 2007. (available at and accessed 09 March 2007). http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ newsroom_and_speeches/press/2007/press_27_07.cfm
  • 8. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H.: Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. "Journal of Financial Economics", Vol. 3, 1976, 303-360.
  • 9. Kaplan S., Schoar A.: Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence, and Capital National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9807, June 2003. (available at: http://papers.nber.org/papers/W9807 accessed 09 March 2007).
  • 10. Lerner J., Schoar A., Wong W.: Smart Institutions, Foolish Choices? The Limited Partner Performance Puzzle. NBER Working Paper 11136, February 2005.artner (available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/11136 accessed 09 March 2007).
  • 11. Linthwaite P.: Statement on trade union comment about private equity industry. Press Release, British Venture Capital Association, BVCA Chief Executive, 6 February 2007.
  • 12. Ljungqvist A., Richardson M.: The Cash Flow, Return and Risk Characteristics of Private Equity. NBER Working Paper 9454, January 2003. (available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/W9454 accessed 09 March 2007).
  • 13. Metrick A., Yasuda A.: The Economics of Private Equity Funds. Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, February 2007.
  • 14. Private Equity Intelligence, 2006 fundraising smashes all previous records. 5 January 2007. (available at: http://www.preqin.com/article.aspx?articleid=233, accessed 09 March 2007).
  • 15. Shleifer A., Vishny R.W.: A survey of corporate governance. "The Journal of Finance", 52, 1997, 737-783.
  • 16. Wolf M.: Barbarians at the gates: the balance of pros and cons. "Financial Times", February 28, 2007.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS6-0022-0073
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.