PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Czy efektywność znajduje odzwierciedlenie w wycenie rynkowej banków w Polsce?

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Bank and bank branch performance in dea models
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest zbadanie siły i charakteru relacji pomiędzy efektywnością a wyceną lynkową banków. Badaniu poddano 10 największych banków komercyjnych w Polsce w okresie 1995-2003: Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej, Bank Przemysłowo-Handlowy, Bank Rozwoju Eksportu, Bank Zachodni WBK, Bank Handlowy w Warszawie, ING Bank Śląski, Kredyt Bank, Bank Millennium, Bank Polska Kasa Opieki oraz Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski. Efektywność oszacowano nieparametryczną metodą analizy granicznej, tj. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Następnie za pomocą Indeksu produktywności Malmquista obliczono roczne zmiany otrzymanych szacunków efektywności, które porównano z rocznymi zwrotami tych z analizowanych banków, które w badanym okresie były notowane na Warszawskiej Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych. Wyniki nie wskazują jednoznacznie na istnienie stabilnych w czasie związków pomiędzy badanymi zmiennymi. Jednakże analizy prowadzone odrębnie w wybranych latach (1996, 1997,1999, 2000, 2001) wykazują bardzo silne zależności pomiędzy efektywnością i zwrotami z akcji, co zdaje się potwierdzać logiczną tezę, że banki bardziej efektywne są drożej wyceniane przez rynek.
EN
This paper aims to examine relationship between efficiency and stock returns for ten biggest polish commercial banks: Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej, Bank Przemysłowo-Handlowy, Bank Rozwoju Eksportu, Bank Zachodni WBK, Bank Handlowy w Warszawie, ING Bank Śląski, Kredyt Bank, Bank Millennium, Bank Polska Kasa Opieki oraz Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski. The study horizon spans over 9 years: 1995-2003. Efficiency measures have been based on one of frontier efficiency methods, namely Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Then using means of Malmquist Index efficiency changes have been calculated between adjacent periods and compared to stock returns for those banks from the sample which were listed on Warsaw Stock Exchange. Results do not indicate any clear relationship between efficiency and stock returns which would be stable for the whole time period under investigation. However it should be emphasised that for some of the periods analysed separately (1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001) the correlation is very strong. This seems to suggest that efficient banks are recognized by investors and thus valued higher than their inefficient counterparts.
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, Zakład Inwestycji i Wyceny Przedsiębiorstw
Bibliografia
  • Ahmed A.S., Morton R.M., Schaefer T.F., 2000, Accounting Conservatism and the Valuation of Accounting Numbers: Evidence on the Feltham-Olhson (1996) model, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15, 271-292.
  • Althin R., 2001, Measurement of Productivity Changes: Two Malmquist Index Approaches, Journal of Productivity Analysis 16, 107-128.
  • Altunbas Y, Chakravarty S, 2001, Frontier Cost Functions and Bank Efficiency, Economic Letters 72, 233-240.
  • Asmild M., Paradi J.C., Aggrawall V., Schaffnit C, 2004, Combining DEA Window Analysis with the Malmquist Index Approach in a Study of the Canadian Banking Industry, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 67-89.
  • Barth M.E, Beaver W.H., Landsman W.R., 2001, The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View, Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 77-104.
  • Bauer P.W., Berger A.N., Ferrier G.D., Humphrey D.B, 1997, Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods, The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper, 0297.
  • Beccalli E., 2004, Cross-country Comparisons of Efficiency: Evidence from the UK and Italian Investment Firms, Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 1363-1383.
  • Beccalli E., Casu B., Girardone C, 2006, Efficiency and Stock Performance in European Banking, Journal of Business and Accounting 33, 245-262.
  • Berg S.A., Forsund F.R., Jansen E.S., 1980-89, Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, Scandinavian Journal of Economics (Suplement), 211-228.
  • Berger A.N., 1993, Distribution-Free Estimates of Efficiency in the U.S. Banking Industry and Tests of the Standard Distribution Assumptions, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 261-292.
  • Berger A.N., De Young R., 2001, The Effect of Geographic Expansion on Bank Efficiency, Journal of Financial Service Research 19, 163-184.
  • Berger A.N, Humphrey D.B., 1997, Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175-212.
  • Berger A.N., Mester L.J., 1997a, Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiency of financial institutions, Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 895-947.
  • Berger A.N., Mester L.J., 1997b, Efficiency and Productivity Change in the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry: A Comparison of 1980s and 1990s', Working Paper, 5 (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, May).
  • Biddle G.C., Chen P., Zhang G., 2001, When Capital Follows Profitability: Non Linear Residual Income Dynamics, Review of Accounting Studies 6, 229-265.
  • Caves D.W., Christiansen L.R., Diewert W.E., 1982, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement input, output and productivity, Econometrica 50, 1393-1414.
  • Chaffai M.E., Dietsch M., Lozano-Vivas A., 2001, Technological and Environmental Differences in The European Banking Industries, Journal of Financial Services Research 19, 147-162.
  • Charnes A., Clark C.T., Cooper W.W., Golany B., 1985, Development Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the U.S. Air Forces, Annals of Operation Research 2, 95-112.
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E., 1978, Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, "European Journal of Operation Research", 2.
  • Chu S.F., Lim G.H., 1998, Share Performance and Profit Efficiency of Banks in a Oligopolistic Market: Evidence from Singapore, Journal of Multinational Financial Management 8, 155-168.
  • Cooper W.W, Seiford L.M., Tone K, 2000, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, Reference and DEA Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, Londyn.
  • Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. 2004 [red.] Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwers Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London.
  • Dechow P.M., Hutton A.P., Sloan R.G., 1999, An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model, Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 1-34.
  • Dietch P.M., Lozano-Vives A., 2000, How the Environment Determines Banking Efficiency: A Comparison Between French and Spanish Industries, Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 985-1004.
  • Eisenbeis R.A., FerrierG.D., Kwan S.H., 1999, The Informativness of Stochastic Frontier Efficiency Scores: Cost Efficiency and Other Measures of Bank Holding Company Performance, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper, 99-30.
  • Fare R., Grosskopf S., 1992, Malmquist index and Fisher ideal index, The Economic Journal, 102, 158-160.
  • Feltham G., Ohlson J.A., 1995, Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities, Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 689-731.
  • Fernandez A.I., Gascon F., Gonzales E., 2002, Economic Efficiency and Value Maximization in the Banking Firms, 1 Kongres EWEPA (European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Oviedo, Hiszpania.
  • Fernandez P., 2002, EVA, Economic Profit and Cash Value Added do not measure shareholder value creation, University of Navara, IESE, Research paper 453.
  • Firodelisi F, Molyneux P., 2004, Efficiency in the Factoring Industry, Applied Economics 36, 947-959.
  • Firodelisi F, Molyneux P., 2006, Do Cost and Profit Efficiency Drive Shareholder Value? Evidence from European Banking, paper presented at Financial Management Association European Conference, Stockholm.
  • Garvey G.T., Milbourn T.T., 2000, EVA Versus Earnings: Does It Matter Which is More Highly Correlated With Stock Returns?, Journal of Accounting Research 38, 209-245.
  • Girardone C, Gardner E.P.M., Molyneux P., 2004, Analysing the Determinants of Bank Efficiency -The Case of Italian Banks, Applied Economics 36, 215-227.
  • Green W.H., Segal D., 1997, Profitability and Efficiency in the U.S. Life Insurance Industry, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 229-247.
  • Holthausen R.W., Watts R.L., 2001, The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 3-75.
  • Kisielewska M., 2006, Ocena efektywności banków i ich oddziałów metodą Data Envelopment Analysis - wybrane zagadnienia metodologiczne [w:] Zarządzanie finansami. Inwestycje i Wycena Przedsiębiorstw, red. D. Zarzecki, Fundacja na rzecz Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin 2006, tom 1,513-531.
  • Kohers T, Huang M-h, Kohers N., 2000, Market Perception of Efficiency in Bank Holding Company Mergers: The Roles of the DEA and SFA Models in Capturing Merger Potential, Review of Financial Economics 9, 101-120.
  • Kwan S.H., Wilcox J.H., 1999, Hidden Cost Reductions in Bank Mergers: Accounting for More Productive Banks, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper 99-10.
  • Liu J., Ohlson J.A., 2000, The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) Model: Empirical Implications, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15, 321-331.
  • Lo K., Lys T, 2000, The Ohlson Model: Contribution to Valuation Theory, Limitations and Empirical Applications, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15, 337-367.
  • Malmquist S., 1953, Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadistica 4, 209-242.
  • Morel M., 1999, Multi-lagged specification of the Ohlson model, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 12, 147-161.
  • O'Hanlon J., Peasnell K., 1998, Wall Streets Contribution to Management Accounting: The Stern Stewart EVA Financial Management System, Management Accounting Research 9, 421-444.
  • Ohlson J.A., 1995, Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research 18, 661-687.
  • Ota K., 2002, A Test of the Ohlson (1995) Model: Empirical Evidence from Japan, International Journal of Accounting 37, 157-182.
  • Paradi J.C, Vela S., Yang Z., 2004, Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance, [w:] Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, red. W.W Cooper, L.M. Seiford, J. Zhu, Kluwers Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London.
  • Projekt badawczy Center for Management of Technology and Enterprenuership Uniwersytetu w Toronto pn. "Bank Productivity and its Relationship to Stock Price Movement", http://www.cmte.uto-ronto. ca/library/masters. shtml.
  • Projekt badawczy Center for Management of Technology and Enterprenuership Uniwersytetu w Toronto pn. "Valuing Private Companies: A Dea Approach", http://www.cmte.utoronto.ca/library/masters, shtml.
  • Seiford L.M., Thrall R.M., 1990, Recent Developments in DEA. The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis, Journal of Econometrics 46, 7-38.
  • Spong K., Sullivan R., DeYoung R., 1995, What Makes a Bank Efficient? A Look on Financial Characteristics and Bank Management and Ownership Structure, Financial and Indusrty Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1-19, Grudzień.
  • Tavares G., 2002, A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-2001), RRR 01-02, Styczeń.
  • Thrall R.M., 2000, Measures in DEA with application to the Malmquist index, Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 125-137.
  • Weill L., 2004, Measuring Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 133-152.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS6-0016-0053
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.