Współczesny reżim tektoniczny w Polsce na podstawie analizy testów szczelinowania hydraulicznego ścian otworów wiertniczych

• Autorzy: Jarosiński M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Recent tectonic stress regime in Poland based on analyses of hydraulic fracturing of borehole walls

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Magnitudes of the recent tectonic stress were estimated based on the hydraulic fracturing data from Poland. In spite of a low quality of the tests, consistent results for particular regions were obtained. For the Outer Carpathians three hydraulic fracturing tests indicate strike-slip stress regime with the local deviation towards the thrust fault regime. Along the front of the Carpathians within the foredeep complex and its basement, low intensity of strike-slip regime with local tendency towards normal fault regime is revealed from tests performed in four wells. Stable, strike-slip stress regime is determined for the Lublin Basin, based on fracturing tests from four wells. Singular result from the Fore-Sudetic Monocline suggests normal fault stress regime for the Permian complex below Zechstein evaporates. Heterogeneity of the stress field within each of these regions is presumably controlled by tectonic structures inherited after the Variscan and the Alpine epochs. For the SE part of Poland, an estimation of the general trend of stress increase with depth gives 2.9 MPa/km for the maximum horizontal stress and 1.9 MPa/km for the minimum horizontal stress.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

szczelinowanie hydrauliczne; naprężenia tektoniczne; tektonika

EN

hydraulic fracturing; recent stress; tectonics; Poland

• Wydawca: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Geologiczny
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: Vol. 53, nr 10/1
• Strony: 863--872
• Opis fizyczny: bibliogr. 31 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jarosiński M.

• Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny, ul. Rakowiecka 4, 00-975 Warszawa,

Bibliografia

• 1. AMADEI B. & STEPHANSSON O. 1997 - Rock Stress and its Measurement. Chapman and Hall London, New York, Tokyo: 476.
• 2. ANDERSON T.O. & STAHL E.J. 1967 - A study of induced fracturing using an instrumental approach. [In.] Journal of Petrolium Technology, 19: 261-267.
• 3. DETOURNAY E., ROEGIERS J.C. & CHENG A. 1987 - Some new examples of poroelastic effects in rock mechanics. [W:] Rock Mechanics, 28 U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam: 575-584.
• 4. ENGELDER T. 1993 - Stress regimes in the lithosphere; Princeton University Press: 449, Princeton, New Yersey.
• 5. EVANS K., ENGELDER T. & PLUMB R.A. 1989 - Appalachan Stress Study1: A detailed description of in situ stress variations in Devonian Shales of the Appalachian Plateau; J. Geoph. Res., 94: 1729-1754.
• 6. GIBOWICZ S.J. 1984 - The mechanism of large mining tremors in Poland. [In:] Guy N.C. & Wainwright E.M. (ed.) - Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines. Johannesburg, 1982, SAIMM: 17-28.
• 7. GUTERCH B. & LEWANDOWSKA-MARCINIAK H. 1975 - Sejsmiczność Polski. [In:] Liszkowski J. & Stochlak J. (ed.) -Współczesne i neotektoniczne ruchy skorupy ziemskiej w Polsce, t.1: 29-32.Wyd. Geol.
• 8. HAIMSON B.C. & FAIRHURST C. 1967 - Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 7: 310-318.
• 9. HAIMSON B.C. 1978 -The hydrofracturing stress measuring method and recent field results; Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 15: 167-178.
• 10. HECK E.T. 1960 - Hydraulic fracturing in light of geological conditions [In:] Producers Monthly, 24: 12-19.
• 11. HICKMAN S.H. & ZOBACK M.D. 1983 - The interpretation of hydraulic fracturing pressure-time data for in situ stress determination: [In:] ZobacK M.D. & Haimson S.H. - Hydraulic Fracturing Stress Measurements, Washington D.C. National Academy Press: 44-54.
• 12. HUBBERT M.K. & WILLIS D.G. 1957 - Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing [In:] Trans. AIME: 153-166.
• 13. JAROSIŃSKI M. 1994 - Metody badania współczesnych naprężeń skorupy ziemskiej w głębokich otworach wiertniczych. Prz. Geol., 42: 564-569.
• 14. JAROSIŃSKI M. 1998 - Contemporary stress field distortion in the Polish part of the Western Outer Carpathians and their basement. Tectonophysics, 297: 91-119.
• 15. JAROSIŃSKI M. 1999 - Badania współczesnych naprężeń skorupy ziemskiej w głębokich otworach wiertniczych w Polsce metodą analizy struktur breakouts. Instrukcje i Metody Badań Geologicznych, 56: 144.
• 16. JAROSIŃSKI M. 2005 (w druku) - Ongoing tectonic reactivation of the Outer Carpathians and its impact on the foreland: results of borehole breakout measurements in Poland. Tectonophysics.
• 17. KIRSCH G. 1898 - Die Theorie der Elastizitat und die Bedurfnisse der Festigkeitslehre. [In:] Zeitschr. VDI; 42: 707.
• 18. LISZKOWSKI J. 1982 - Przyczyny pionowych ruchów skorupy ziemskiej w Polsce. Rozprawy Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 98: 1-179.
• 19. MOOS D.& ZOBACK M.D. 1990 - Utilisation of the observation of well bore failure to constrain the orientation and magnitude of crustal stress. J. Geoph. Res., 95: 9305-9325.
• 20. RUMEL F., BAUMGARTNER J. & ALHEID H.J. 1983 - Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements along the eastern boundary of the SW - German Block. [In:] ZobacK M.D., Haimson B.C. - Hydraulic Fracturing Stress Measurements, Washington, D.C., National Acad. Press: 3-17.
• 21. SANTARELLI F.J. & BROWN E.T. 1987 - Performance of deep wellbores in rock with a confining pressure-dependent elastic modulus; Proc. VI International Congress on Rock Mechanics, 2: 1217-1222, Montreal.
• 22. SHIN K., LI F. & OKUBO S. 1996 - Hydro-fracturing measurements in intact granitic rock. [In:]: Barla (ed.) Eurock’96, Balkema, Rotterdam: 427-434.
• 23. SCHMITT D.R. & ZOBACK M.D. 1989 - Laboratory tests of the effects of pore pressure on tensile failure. [In:] Maury V., Fourmaintraux D. (eds.) - Rock at great depth: 883-889; A.A.BalKema, Rotterdam.
• 24. STEPHENS G. & VOIGHT B. 1982 - Hydraulic Fracturing Theory for Conditions of Thermal Stress. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geom. Pergamon Press Ltd, Great Britain: 279-283.
• 25. SZEWCZYK J. 2005 (w druku) - Gęstości objętościowe a syntetyczne profilowania gęstości. Bul. PIG.
• 26. TUNBRIDGE L. 1988 - Interpretation of the shut-in pressure from the rate of pressure decay. Int. J. Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 26: 457-460.
• 27. WARPINSKI N.R., SCHMIDT R.A., NOTHRUP D.A. 1981 - In situ stresses: The predominant influence on hydraulic fracture containment. J. Petrol. Technology; t. 34: 653-664.
• 28. WIEJACZ P. 1994 - An attempt to determine tectonic stress patterns in Poland. Acta Geophys. Pol., 3: 169-176.
• 29. ZOBACK M.D., TSUKAHARA H. & HICKMAN S. 1980 - Stress measurements at depth in the vicinity of the San Andres Fault: implications for the magnitude of shear stress at depth; J. Geophys. Res., 85: 6157-6173.
• 30. ZOBACK M.L. & ZOBACK M. 1980 - State of stress in the Conterminous United States; J. Geophys. Res. 85: 6113-6156.
• 31. ZUCHIEWICZ W. 1995 -Neotectonics of Poland: a state-of-the-art review. Folia Quaternaria, 66: 7-37.