Application of an Open Environment for Simulation of Power Plant Unit Operation under Steady and Transient Conditions

• Autorzy: Barszcz T. , Czop P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the paper is to present a proposal and discuss an application of an open environment for modeling of a power plant unit. Such an environment is called the Virtual Power Plant (VPP) and is based on a model created in the Matlab/ Simulink environment. VPP provides a framework for incorporating a broad variety of models, ranging from simple system models that run in real-time to detailed models that will require off-line mode to execute. The paper presents the architecture of the VPP and briefly describes its main components. An approach to implementation, including necessary simplification, submodels encapsulation and integration are discussed and illustrated by schematics and equations. The paper includes a case study, where the 225 MW coal fired unit is modeled.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

power plant; steam turbine; modelling; MATLAB; Simulink

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Czasopismo: Schedae Informaticae
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 17/18
• Strony: 87--116
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Barszcz T.

autor

Czop P.

• Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Kim D.W., Youn C., Cho B.H., Son G.; Development of a power plant simulation tool with GUI based on general purpose design software, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 13, 2005, pp. 493–501.
• [2] Thermoflow. Available via: http://www.thermoflow.com/.
• [3] Leva A., Maffezzoni C., Benelli G.; Validation of drum boiler models through complete dynamic tests, Control Engineering Practice, 7, 1999, pp. 11–26.
• [4] PROVECTA. Available via: http://www.provecta.com.au/.
• [5] Brackenhammer E., Schmidt E.; Dynamic turbine simulator for steam turbine controller examination. Available via: http://www.siemens.com/.
• [6] Maffezzoni C.; Boiler-turbine dynamics in power-plant control, Control Engineering Practice, 5(3), 1997, pp. 301–312.
• [7] Weng C.K., Ray A., Dai X.; Modeling of power plant dynamics and uncertainties for robust control synthesis, Applied Mathematical Modeling, 20, 1996, pp. 501–512.
• [8] Franke R., Rode M., Krüger K.; On-line optimization of drum boiler startup, Proceedings of the 3rd International Modelica Conference, Linköping 2003, pp. 287–296.
• [9] Lakshmiraju M., Cui K.; Numerical investigations of pressure loss reduction in a power plant stuck, Applied Mathematical Modeling, 31, 2007, pp. 1915–1933.
• [10] Flynn D.; Thermal power plants, Simulation and control, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London 2000.
• [11] nHance Technologies, Training Simulators. Available via:http://www.nhancetech.com/.
• [12] van Putten H., Colonna P.; Dynamic modeling of steam power cycles. Part I –Simulation of a small simple Rankine cycle system, Applied Thermal Engineering, 27, 2007, pp. 467–480.
• [13] van Putten H., Colonna P.; Dynamic modeling of steam power cycles. Part II –Simulation of a small simple Rankine cycle system, Applied Thermal Engineering, 27, 2007, pp. 2566–2582.
• [14] Guimaraesa L.N., Oliveira N.S., Borges E.M.; Derivation of a nine variable model of a U-tube steam generator coupled with a three-element controller, Applied Mathematical Modeling, 32, 2008, pp. 1027–1043.
• [15] Elmegaard B., Houbak N.; Software for the simulation of power plant processes. Part A and B, ECOS, 2002.
• [16] Kim D.W., Youn C., Cho B.H., Son G.; Development of a power plant simulation tool with GUI based on general purpose design software, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 3, 2005, pp. 493–501.
• [17] MATLAB/SIMULINK documentation, Mathworks Inc., 2005.
• [18] Janiczek R.S.; Power plant operation (original title in Polish: Eksploatacja elektrowni parowych), Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa 1992.
• [19] Lu S.; Dynamic modelling and simulation of power plant systems, Proceedings of the I MECH E, Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, 213 (1), 1999, pp. 7–22.
• [20] Cepák M.; Simulation of the steam turbine in Matlab environment, in 2nd International Industrial Simulation Conference Malaga, Spain, 2004, pp. 251–255.
• [21] IEEE Subsynchronous resonance working group, Second benchmark model for computer simulation of subsynchronous resonance, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS–104 (5), 1985, pp. 1057–1066.
• [22] Brackenhammer E., Schmidt E.; Dynamic turbine simulator for steam turbine controller examination. Available via: http://www.siemens.com/.
• [23] Lu S., Hogg B.W., Dynamic nonlinear modelling of power plant by physical principles and neural networks, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 22, 2000, pp. 67–78.
• [24] Barszcz T.; Virtual Power Plant in condition monitoring of power generation unit, Proceedings of the 20th International Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management, Faro, Portugal, June 13–15, 2007.
• [25] Barszcz T., Czop P.; Methodologies and applications of virtual power plant –New environment for power plant elements modeling, Institute of Sustainable Technologies, Radom 2007.
• [26] Holmgren M.; X Steam for Matlab. Available via: http://www.x-eng.com/.
• [27] Test report, ENERGOPOMIAR, Poland, Gliwice 2005.
• [28] Maffezzoni C., Ferrarini L., Carpanzano E.; Object orientated models for advanced automation engineering, Control Engineering Practice, 7, 2000, pp. 957–968.
• [29] Kiciński J., Drozdowski R., Materny P.; Nonlinear model of vibrations in a rotor-bearings system, Journal of Vibration & Control, 4 (5), 1998, pp. 519–540.
• [30] ABB – PROCONTROL P control and supervision with process operator station POS30, User manual, Germany, Mannheim 2006.
• [31] Astrom K., Bell R.; Drum-boiler dynamics, Automatica, 36, 2000, pp. 363–378.
• [32] Franke R., Rode M., Krüger K.; On-line optimization of drum boiler startup, Proceedings of the 3rd International Modelica Conference, Linköping 2003, pp. 287–296.
• [33] Boldea I.; Synchronous generators, Taylor & Francis Group, New York 2006.
• [34] Barszcz T., Czop P.; System Identification and its limitation relating to diagnosis of rotating machinery faults, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Poland, Międzyzdroje, 2004, pp. 1029–1034.
• [35] Barszcz T., Czop P., Uhl T.; Parametric approach to fault detection and isolation in steam turbine control system, Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Poland, Międzyzdroje, 2003, pp. 1357–1362.
• [36] Uzunow M.; Influence of discretization of a steam flow system on simulation of transient processes (in Polish), Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warsaw, Poland, 2001.
• [37] Hobler H.; Heat transfers and heat exchangers (original title in Polish: Ruch ciepła i wymienniki), Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa 1986.
• [38] Perycz S. Steam and gas turbines (original title in Polish: Turbiny parowe i gazowe), Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poland, Wrocław 1992.
• [39] Georgiadis M., Macchietto S.; Dynamic modelling and simulation of plate heat exchangers under milk fouling, Chemical Engineering Science, 55, 2000, pp. 1605–1619.
• [40] Krämer E.; Dynamics of rotors and foundations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1993.
• [41] Barszcz T., Mańka M.; Application of hardware-in-the-loop for Virtual Power Plant, Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Technical Diagnostics, Olsztyn, Sept 9–12, Poland, 2008.
• [42] Muszyńska A.; Rotordynamics, Taylor & Francis Group, Minden 2005.
• [43] Mahrenholtz O. et al.; Dynamics of rotors – stability and system identification, Springer-Verlag, New York 1984.
• [44] Frene J., Nicolas D., Deguerce B., Berthe D., Godet M.; Hydrodynamic lubrication. Bearings and thrust bearings, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1997.