On safety and dependability of automotiye engineering regarding applicable tools and legislation

• Autorzy: Fulep T. , Voith A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In today's automotive industry, companies are organized into simultaneous engineering teams to develop their new products. The new way of doing business enables some companies to develop their new products quicker and cheaper with higher quality and reliability. In the past few years there has been the tendency to increase the safety of vehicles by introducing intelligent assistance systems that help the driver to cope with critical driving situations. These functions are characterized by the active control of the driving dynamics by distributed assistance systems, which therefore need a reliable communication network. The faults in the electronic components, which control these functions, are safety-critical. However, the assistance functions deliver only an add-on service in accordance with a fail-safe strategy for the electronic components. If there is any doubt about the correct behaviour of the assistance system, it will be switched off. For by-wire systems, without a mechanical back-up, a new dimension of safety requirements for automotive electronics is reached. After a fault the system has to be fail-tolerant until a safe state is reached. realizing that road vehicles, mostly commercial vehicles taking part over proportionally in accidents, become more and more complex indicates that suitable and adaptable analysis methods are crucial to be applied with appropriate certification body.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

transport; safety; dependability; safety-related

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Aviation ; European Science Society of Powertrain and Transport KONES Poland ; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONES
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 16, No. 4
• Strony: 123--134
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 4 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Fulep T.

autor

Voith A.

• Department ofAutomobile Engineering Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary StoczekSt. 6, Budapest, Hungary, H-1111 tel: [phone],

Bibliografia

• [1] Pickard, K., Leopold, T., Dieter, A., Bertsche, B., Validation of similar based on FMEA assessment, Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, Aven & Vinnem (eds), Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 1859-1863, London, 2007.
• [2] Michelberger, P., Barta, Gy., Farkas, T., Reliability prediction of vehicles by pattern cognition, Periodica Polytechnica (Transportation Engineering) 10, No. 1, pp. 41-52, 1982.
• [3] Rouvroye, J. L., Brombacher, A. C., New quantitative safety standards: Different techniques, different results?, Safety and Reliability, Lydersen, Hansen & Sandtorv (eds), Balkema, pp. 305-309, Rotterdam 1998.
• [4] Signor, M., The failure-analysis matrix: A Kinder, gentler alternative to FMEA for information systems, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Seattle, pp. 173-177, USA 2002.
• [5] Lee, B. H., Encoding design FMEA casual models as Bayesian network structures, Int. Conf. on Engineering Design, pp. 165-170, 1999
• [6] Montgomery, T. A., Pugh, D. R., Leedham, S. T., Twitchett, S. R., FMEA automation for the complete design process, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 30-36, Las Vegas, USA 1996.
• [7] Passey, R. D. C., Foresight begins with FMEA, Medical Device Technology, Vol. 10, pp. 88-92, 1999.
• [8] Piolat, A., Roussey, J., Thunin, O., Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising, Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 565-589, 1997.
• [9] Gilchrist, W., Modelling failure modes and effects analysis, Int. Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 10, pp. 16-23, 1993.
• [10] Dhillon, B. S., Design reliability: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press LLC, 1999.
• [11] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA, Robert Bosch GmbH, 1998.
• [12] Kukkal, P., Bowles, J. B., Bonnell, R. D., Database design for failure modes and effects analysis, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 231-239, USA 1993.
• [13] Bowles, J. B., The new SAE FMECA standard, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Anaheim, California, pp. 48-53, USA 1998.
• [14] Filippidis Dr., A. B. L., Acceptable failure detection and negation times based on hazard rates and probabilities, Forms/Format, Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems, Schnieder, E. & Tarnai, G. (eds), Braunschweig, Germany pp. 44-51, 2004.
• [15] Schäbe Dr., H., Different approaches for determination of tolerable hazard rates, Proc. of European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Vol. 1, pp. 435-442, Torino 2001.
• [16] Boulanger, J. L., Schön, W., Reference systems and standards for safety assessment of railway applications, Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, Aven & Vinnem (eds), Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 2609-2613, London, 2007.
• [17] Robinson, R. M., Anderson, K. J., SIL Rating Fire Protection Equipment, 8th Australian Workshop on Safety-critical Systems and Software (SCS’03), Canberra. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, P. Lindsay & T. Cant, Eds., Vol. 33.
• [18] Evans, R. A., Electronics reliability: a personal view, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 47, Iss. 3, Part 2, pp. 329-332, 1998.
• [19] Knight, C. R., Four decades of reliability progress annual reliability and maintainability symposium, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Orlando, pp. 156-160, USA 1991.
• [20] Kuehn, R. E., Four decades of reliability experience, Proc. of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 76-81, Orlando, USA 1991.
• [21] Denson, W., The history of reliability prediction, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 321-328, 1998.
• [22] Coppola, A., Reliability engineering of electronic equipment: A historical perspective, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R-33, pp. 29-35, 1984.