Multicriteria rankings of open-end investment funds and their stability

• Autorzy: Sielska A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For research purposes, three multicriteria outranking methods (PROMETHEE, WSA and TOPSIS) were used to construct rankings of investment funds to assess their performance in the time period from January to July 2008. Nine indicators related to the distributions of return rates, purchase and management costs and to customers’ convenience were included in the set of criteria. The weight of each criterion was calculated on the basis of the relative volatility rate of the given criterion. In order to assess the stability of the rankings, the weight of a single criterion was changed (using each criterion in turn) and new rankings were constructed using the modified weights. The similarity of rankings built before and after these changes was assessed on the basis of the maximum difference between ranks and the Spearman correlation coefficient. The results obtained enable assessment not only of the stability of each outranking method, but the similarity of results obtained by different methods as well. All calculations were done using the SANNA software.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

investment funds; outranking methods; PROMETHEE method; WSA method; TOPSIS method; stability of rankings

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Operations Research and Decisions
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 1
• Strony: 111--129
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Sielska A.

• University of Finance and Management, ul. Pawia 55, 01-030 Warszawa,

Bibliografia

• [1] Al KABER M., Rynki finansowe i instytucje, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej, 2006.
• [2] ARDITTI F., Risk and the required return on equity, Journal of Finance, 1967, 22, 19–36.
• [3] BANA e COSTA C.A., A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three criteria problems: a case study in municipal management, European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 33, 159–173.
• [4] BASSO A., FUNARY S., A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 135, 477–492.
• [5] BRANS J.P., VINCKE P., A preference ranking organization method, Management Science, 1985, 31, 647–656.
• [6] BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., VINCKE P., How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM, European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, 24, 228–238.
• [7] BUCZEK S., Efekt nowych funduszy inwestycyjnych (otwartych) akcji w Polsce, Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, 2006, 1133.
• [8] COOK W., HEBNER K., A multicriteria approach to mutual fund selection, Financial Services Review, 1992, 2, 1–20.
• [9] DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method, Computers and Operations Research, 1995, 22, 763–770.
• [10] ELING M., Performance Measurement of Hedge Funds Using Data Envelopment Analysis, University of St. Gallen, Working Paper Series in Finance, 2006, 31.
• [11] FIGUEIRA J., GRECO S., EHRGOTT M. (ed.), Multiple Criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys, Springer, 2005.
• [12] GAL T., STEWART T.J., HANNE T. (ed.), Multicriteria decision making: advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory and applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
• [13] GALAS Z., NYKOWSKI I., ŻÓŁKIEWSKI Z., Programowanie wielokryterialne, Warszawa, PWE, 1987.
• [14] GELDERMANN J., RENTZ O., Bridging the Gap between American and European MADM-Approaches?, 51st Meeting of the European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions”, Madrid, 2000.
• [15] HWANG C.L., YOON K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer‚New York‚ 1981.
• [16] JABLONSKY J., Multicriteria evaluation of alternatives in spreadsheets, [in:] Lenart L.‚ Zadnik Stirn L.‚ Drobne S. (ed.) Proceedings of SOR ’01 Conference‚ Preddvor‚ Slovenia, Slovenian Society Infromatika‚ 2001.
• [17] JENSEN C.M., The Performance of Mutual Funds in the period 1945–1964, Journal of Finance, 1967, 23, 389–416.
• [18] JORION P., Value AT Risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk, McGraw-Hill Companies, 2006.
• [19] KALISZEWSKI I., Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji: obliczenia miękkie dla złożonych problemów decyzyjnych, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe i Techniczne, 2008.
• [20] KEENEY R.L., RAIFFA H., Decisions with multiple objectives, Wiley, 1976.
• [21] KOLENDA M., Taksonomia numeryczna. Klasyfikacja, porządkowanie i analiza obiektów wielocechowych, AE, Wrocław, 2006.
• [22] KOLOCH G., KUSZEWSKI T., SZAPIRO T., On stability of educational rankings, [in:] Trzaskalik T. (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making ’07, AE, Katowice, 2008.
• [23] MAJEWSKI S., Ocena stopnia skłonności do ryzyka funduszy inwestycyjnych akcji, [in:] Chrzan P. (ed.), Metody matematyczne, ekonometryczne i informatyczne w finansach i ubezpieczeniach, AE, Katowice, 2004.
• [24] MARESCHAL B., Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid, European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 33, 54–64.
• [25] MARKOWITZ H.M., Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments, Blackwell, 1998.
• [26] MARTEL J.-M., AOUNI B., Incorporating the Decision-Maker's Preferences in the Goal-Programming Model, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1990, 41, 1121–1132.
• [27] MCMULLEN P.R., STRONG R.A., Selection of mutual funds using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 1998, 4, 1–12.
• [28] MILLER G.A., The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 1956, 63, 81–97.
• [29] MURTHI B.P.S., CHOI Y.K., DESAI P., Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 98, 408–418.
• [30] NGUYEN-THI-THANH H., On the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in Hedge Fund Selection, Working Paper, 2006, Université d'Orléans.
• [31] OPRICOVIC S., TZENG G.-H., Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156, 445–455.
• [32] PENDARAKI K., DOUMPOS M., ZOPOUNIDIS C., Evaluation of Equity Mutual Funds’ Performance Using a Multicriteria Methodology, South Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2003, 1, 85–104.
• [33] PYKA I. (ed.), Tendencje i perspektywy rozwoju rynków finansowych w Polsce, AE w Katowicach, Katowice, 2004.
• [34] RAMASAMY B., YEUNG C.H., Evaluating mutual funds in an emerging market: factors that matter to financial advisors, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 2003, 21, 122–136.
• [35] SAS-KULCZYCKA K., CHORYŁO D., KRÓL J., LASOTA Z., Instytucje wspólnego inwestowania w Polsce. Fundusze inwestycyjne i emerytalne, WIG-Press, Warszawa, 1998.
• [36] SENGUPTA J.K., Efficiency tests for mutual fund portfolios, Applied Financial Economics, 2003, 13, 869–876.
• [37] SHARPE W., Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, 1966, 39, 119–138.
• [38] SHARPE W., The Sharpe ratio, Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994, 21, 49–59.
• [39] STECZKOWSKI J., ZELIAŚ A., Metody statystyczne w badaniach zjawisk jakościowych, AE w Krakowie, Kraków, 1997.
• [40] STEUER R.E., NA P., Multiple Criteria Decision Making Combined with Finance: A Categorized Bibliographic Study, European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 50, 496–515.
• [41] TAVARES L.V., Multicriteria scheduling of a railway renewal program, European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, 25, 395–405.
• [42] TREYNOR J., How to rate management of investment funds, Harvard business review, 1965, 43, 63–75.
• [43] TRZASKALIK T. (ed.), Metody wielokryterialne na polskim rynku finansowym, PWE, Warszawa, 2006.
• [44] WOLTERS W., MARESHAL B., Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods, European Journal of operational Research, 1995, 81, 281–290.
• [45] ZELENY M., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw–Hill, New York, 1982.