PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Mercury-free dissolution of aluminum-based nuclear material: from basic science to the plant

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Conditions were optimized for the first plant-scale dissolution of an aluminum-containing nuclear material without using mercury as a catalyst. This nuclear material was a homogeneous mixture of plutonium oxide and aluminum metal that had been compounded for use as the core matrix in Mark 42 nuclear fuel. B ecause this material had later failed plutonium distribution specifications, it was rejected for use in the fabrication of Mark 42 fuel tubes, and was stored at the Savannah River Site (SRS) awaiting disposition. This powder-like material was composed of a mixture of ~80% aluminum and 11% plutonium. Historically, aluminum-clad spent nuclear fuels have been dissolved using a mercuric nitrate catalyst in a nitric acid (HNO3) solution to facilitate the dissolution of the bulk aluminum cladding. Developmental work at SRS indicated that the plutonium oxide/aluminum compounded matrix could be dissolved using boric acid-hydrofluoric acid-nitric acid as a substitute for mercury. Various mercury-free conditions were studied to evaluate the rate of dissolution of the Mark 42 compact material and to assess the corrosion rate to the stainless steel dissolver. The elimination of mercury from the dissolution process fit with waste minimization and industrial hygiene goals to reduce the use of mercury in the United States. The mercury-free dissolution technology was optimized for Mark 42 compact material in laboratory-scale tests, and successfully implemented at the plant.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
163--169
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Savannah River Technology Center, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC, USA, 29808, Tel.: +803/ 725 2041, Fax: +803/ 725 2756
autor
  • Environmental Engineering and Science, Clemson University, 342 Computer Court, Anderson, SC, USA, 29625-6510
autor
  • Savannah River Technology Center, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC, USA, 29808, Tel.: +803/ 725 2041, Fax: +803/ 725 2756
  • Savannah River Technology Center, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC, USA, 29808, Tel.: +803/ 725 2041, Fax: +803/ 725 2756
autor
  • Savannah River Technology Center, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC, USA, 29808, Tel.: +803/ 725 2041, Fax: +803/ 725 2756
autor
  • Environmental Engineering and Science, Clemson University, 342 Computer Court, Anderson, SC, USA, 29625-6510
Bibliografia
  • 1. Anderson PA, Christian JD (1998) Alternative reagent to mercuric nitrate catalyst for dissolution of aluminum-clad nuclear fuels in nitric acid. J Mater Res 13;1:68−76
  • 2. Christian JD, Anderson PA (1994) Mercury-free dissolution of aluminum-clad fuel in nitric scid. U S Patent no. 5,364,603
  • 3. Cobb CL (1989) Eliminating mercury from the waste stream. Report no. WSRC-RP-89-1232. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC
  • 4. Crooks WJ III (2000) Validation of flow sheet for dissolution and downstream processing of Mark 42 compacts and sweepings. Report no. WSRC-TR-2000-00181, rev. 0. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC
  • 5. Crooks WJ III, Murray AM, Gray JH, Westover PA (1999) Formation of potassium tetrafluoroborate in SRS canyon dissolver. In: Proc of the 23rd Annual Actinide Separations Conf, June 7−13, 1999, Kennewick, Washington, USA, p 30
  • 6. Dunn KA, Mickalonis JI (1999) Experimental study to evaluate corrosion of the F-canyon dissolver during the unirradiated Mark-42 campaign. Report no. WSRC-TR-99-00261. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC
  • 7. George TS (2001) Minamata: pollution and the struggle for democracy in postwar Japan. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
  • 8. Gray JH (1984) Develop an alternative to the use of mercury in H canyon. Report no. DPST-84-250, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC
  • 9. Howell JP (1995) Corrosion of aluminum alloys in wet spent fuel storage. Report no. WSRC-TR-95-0343, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC
  • 10. Lippmann M (2001) Environmental toxicants: human exposures and their health effects, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York
  • 11. Murray AM, Crooks WJ III (1999) Flow sheet development for the dissolution of unirradiated Mark 42 fuel tubes in F-canyon. Part II. Report no. WSRC-TR-98-00196, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC
  • 12. Roberson JH (2002) Statement of Jessie H. Roberson Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management. U S Department of Energy before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations U S House of Representatives, March 14, 2002
  • 13. Schulz WW, Navratil JD (1984) The science and technology of tributyl phosphate. Vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  • 14. U S Department of Energy (2000) Spent nuclear fuel management environmental impact statement. Report no. DOE/EIS-0279, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, SC
  • 15. U S Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Mercury study for Congress. Vol. I: Executive summary. Government Report no. EPA-452/R-97-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development
  • 16. Wymer RG, Blanco RE (1957) Uranium-aluminum alloy dissolution. Ind Eng Chem 49:59−61
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUJ5-0004-0031
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.