Methods of static analysis of anchored diaphragm walls

Siemińska-Lewandowska, A.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Methods of static analysis of anchored diaphragm walls

Autorzy

Siemińska-Lewandowska A.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Metody analizy statycznej kotwionych ścian szczelinowych - stan wiedzy

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The paper presents the state of the art in the area of static analysis of anchored diaphragm walls. In Poland there are no legal regulations concerning the dimensioning of diaphragm walls. As in the case of spread foundations static analysis three main approach methods are distinguished. First is calculation of anchored diaphragm wall as a rigid beam structure, subjected to active and passive earth pressures. Methods of analysis have been presented for cantilever walls, walls with single or several levels of anchors, considering substitute diagrams of active pressure, which — as the result of prestressing of anchors or forces acting in struts - are subject to redistribution. Second case is the method of subgrade reaction modulus. Diaphragm wall is considered as a statically indeterminate elastic beam, subjected to soil pressure and the unknown subgrade reaction, modelled by means of spring analogue based on Winkler model. Apart from equilibrium equations for unit element of the wall, principles of determining earth pressures and subgrade reaction, methods are discussed of the determination of kh coefficient, indispensable in the analysis. Third approach is statical analysis of plane structure consisting of diaphragm wall, anchor and the interacting ground mass using Finite Element Method. In the paper more adequate constitutive soil models have been discussed than the isotropic or linear-elastic, giving the number of model parameters necessary for its definition, corresponding types of soils, and their accessibility in computer programs. Each of the presented method was discussed and its suitability for static analysis, dimensioning, the design of anchored diaphragm walls was assessed.

W artykule przedstawiono aktualny stan wiedzy o metodach analizy statycznej kotwionych ścian szczelinowych. Z uwagi na brak w Polsce regulacji prawnych dotyczących wymiarowania tego rodzaju konstrukcji przedstawiono obszerne omówienie trzech podstawowych grup metod. Analogicznie, jak w przypadku statyki płytkich fundamentów budowli wyróżniono trzy zasadnicze podejścia. Pierwsze to obliczanie kotwionej ściany szczelinowej jako sztywnej belki, poddanej danemu obciążeniu parciem i odporem gruntu. Przedstawiono sposoby analizy ścian wspornikowych, jednokrotnie i wielokrotnie kotwionych, z uwzględnieniem zastępczych wykresów parcia czynnego, które w wyniku działania sił sprężających kotwie lub sił od rozpór ulega redystrybucji. Drugi sposób wykorzystuje metodę modułu podatności podłoża. Ściana szczelinowa jest statycznie niewyznaczalnym ustrojem prętowym poddanym znanemu obciążeniu parciem gruntu i nieznanej reakcji podłoża modelowanego za pomocą analogu sprężynowego. Oprócz równań równowagi dla jednostkowego elementu ściany oraz zasad wyznaczania parcia i reakcji podłoża, omówiono sposoby wyznaczania, niezbędnego w analizie, współczynnika kh. Trzecie podejście to analiza statyczna płaskiego ustroju, złożonego ze ściany szczelinowej, kotew i współdziałającego masywu gruntowego, metodą elementów skończonych. Opisano bardziej adekwatne modele konstytutywne gruntu niż izotropowy i liniowo-sprężysty, podając wymaganą do zdefiniowania liczbę parametrów modelu, rodzaj gruntu oraz ich dostępność w programach komputerowych. Dla każdej z omówionych metod przeprowadzono dyskusję i ocenę jej przydatności do analizy statycznej, wymiarowania i projektowania kotwionych ścian szczelinowych.

Słowa kluczowe

ściana szczelinowa ściana kotwiona analiza statyczna metoda wymiarowania projektowanie

Wydawca

Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN
Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej

Czasopismo

Archives of Civil Engineering

Rocznik

2001

Tom

Vol. 47, nr 4

Strony

463--500

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 161 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Siemińska-Lewandowska A.

Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

1. K.J. BAKKER, R.B.J. BRINKGREVE, Deformation analysis of a sheet pile wall using a two dimensional model, Proc. 10th ECMFE, Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 655-658.
2. A. BALASUBRAMANIAM, D. BERGADO, J.C. CHAI, Deformation analysis of deep excavations in Bangkok subsoils, Proc. 13th ICSMFE, New-Dehli 1994, Vol. 2, 909-914.
3. J. BALAY, Recommendations for the design of retaining structures using subgrade reaction method; parameters study [in French], LCPC, Paris 1984, 24.
4. J. BALAY, Finite element method for the design of retaining structures, [in French], Presses de l'ENPC, Paris 1988, 249-256.
5. J. BALAY, J.-F. CORTE, Development of design methods for anchored retaining structures [in French], Annales des Ponts et Chaussés 1985, 2e trimestre, 2-24.
6. J. BALAY, R. FRANK, L. HARFOUCHE, DENEBOLA software for designing of retaining structures using method based on subgrade reaction coefficient [in French], Buli. LPC, 120, 3-12, 1982.
7. S. BARUSSAUD, Theoretical analysis of a tied back wall [in French], Revue. Fr. Geotechnique, 71, 21-30, 1995.
8. K.J. BATHE, Finite element procedures in engineering analysis, Prentice-Hall, 1982.
9. L. BJERRUM, C.J. FRIMANN CLAUSEN, J.M. DUNCAN, Earth pressure on flexible Structures - A state of the art report, Proc. 5th ECSME, Madrid 1972, Vol. 2, 169-196.
10. J.C. BLIVET, P. BONAFOUS, R. FRANK, H. JOSSEAUME, The behaviour of diaphragm wall as a protection of the quay wall in Havre harbour [in French], Bull. LPC, 113, 111-134, 1981.
11. H. BLUM, One-dimensional stress state analysis around excavation walls [in German], Ernst & Sohn, Berlin 1931.
12. H. BLUM, Introduction to the designing struted excavations [in German], Ernst & Sohn, Berlin 1951.
13. A. BOLT, E. DEMBICKI, G. HORODECKI, K. JAWORSKA, Analysis of measurements and calculations of multi-anchored diaphragm wall [in Polish], XI KKMGF, Gdańsk 1997, 97-106.
14. M.D. BOLTON, W. POWRIE, The collapse of diaphragm walls retaining clay, Géotechnique, 37, 3. 335-353, 1987.
15. M.D. Bolton, W. POWRIE, Behaviour of diaphramg walls in clay prior to collapse Géotechnique, 38, 2, 167-189, 1988.
16. M.D. Bolton, W. POWRIE, I.F. SYMONS, The design of stiff in-situ walls retairing overconsolidated clay - Part I, Ground Eng., 22, 8, 44-48, 1989.
17. M.D. BOLTON, W. POWRIE, I.F, SYMONS, The design of stiff in-situ walls retaining overconsolidated clay - Part I, Ground Eng., 23, 1, 34-40, 1990.
18. M.D. BOLTON, W. POWRIE, I.F, SYMONS, The design of stiff in-situ walls retaining overconsolidated clay - Part II, Ground Eng.. 23, 2, 22-28, 1990.
19. P. BONAFOUS, J.-C. BARIL, Classical and elasto-plastic methods of retaining structures analysis. Part 1 [in French], Construction, 31, 1, 78-82, 1976.
20. P. BONAFOUS, J.-C. BARIL, Classical and elasto-plastic methods of retaining structures analysis Part 1 [in French], Construction, 31, 2, 127-129, 1976.
21. J. BOUSSINESQ, Remarks on determination of the minimum thickness of retaining wall with height and density specified supporting non cohesive soil massif with horizontal surface [in French], Annales des Ponts et Chausses, 623-643, 1882.
22. K.C. BRADY, M.P. O REILLY, R.T. MURRAY, Monitoring deformations of reinforced and anchored soil structures, Proc. 10th ECMFE, Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 673-676.
23. J.B. BURLAND, B. SIMPSON, H.D. ST. JOHN, Movements around excavations in London Clay, Proc. 7th ECSMFE Brighton 1979, Vol. 1, 13-29.
24. J.B. BURLAND, The overall stability of free and propped embedded cantilever retaining walls. Ground Eng., 14, 5, 28-38, 1981.
25. A. CANDOGAN, A. SAGLAMER, Anchor supported walls for deep excavations in Istanbul claystones, Proc. 10th ECMFE, Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 683-687.
26. A. CAQUOT, Detailed calculation method - cylindrical surface of the landslide [in French], Géotechnique, 5, 1955.
27. A. CAQUOT, J. KERISEL, E. ABSI, Active and passive earth pressure tables [in French], Ed. Villard, Paris 1972.
28. D .R. CARDER, Ground movements caused by different embedded retaining wall construction techniques, Report TRL, no. 172/1995, Crowthorne: TRL, 22.
29. D.R. CARDER, D.J. PRESS, C.H. MORLEY, G.H. ALDERMAN, Behaviour during construction of propped diaphragm wall founded in London clay at Aldershot Road underpass, Report TRL, no. 2:39/1997, Crowthorne: TRL, 22.
30. R. CHADEISSON, Diaphragm walls [in French], Proc. 5th ECSMFE Paris 1961, Vol. 2. 563-568.
31. C.-Y. CHANG, J.M. DUNCAN, Analysis of soil movement around a deep excavation, Proc. ASCE, Jour. Soil Mec. Found. Division, 96, SM5, 1655-1681, 1970.
32. S. CHEW, K. YONG, A.Y. LIM, Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a strutted excavation, Proc. 19th IC Comp. Methods in Geotechnics, Wuhan 1997, Vol. 3,1915-1919.
33. G.W. CLOUGH, J.M. DUNCAN, Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior, Proc. ASCE, Jour. Soil Mech. Found Division, 97, SM12, 1657-1673, 1971.
34. G.W. CLOUGH, Application of the finite element method to earth-structure interaction; Proc. Symp. Appl. FEM in Geot. Eug., Vicksburg 1972, Vol. 3, 1057-1116.
35. G.W. CLOUGH, P.R, WEBER, J. LAMONT, Design and observation of a tied-back wall, Proc. ASCE 1972, Vol. l, Part 2, 1367-1389.
36. G W. CLOUGH, A.I. MANA, Lessons learned in finite element analyses of temporary excavations in soft clays, Proc. ASCE 1976, Vol. 1, 496-510.
37. K.W. COLE, J.B. BURLAND, Observation of retaining wall movements associated with a large excavation, Proc. 5th ECSMFE, Madrid 1972, Vol. 1, 445-453.
38. E. COMODROMOS, K. PITILAKIS, T. HATZIGOGOS, Finite element procedure for simulating excavation in elastoplostic soils [in French], Revue. Française de Géotechnique, 58, 51-66, 1992.
39. J.F. CORTE, A propos of the retaining walls calculation method based on subgrade reaction coefficient [in French], Bull. LPC, 104, 49-52, 1979.
40. C.A. COULOMB, Sur une application des règles de maximis et de minimis a quelques problèmes de statique relatifs ál’architecture, Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences présentés par des savants, 7, 343-382, 1773.
41. M.J. CREED, N.E. SIMONS, G.C. SlLLS, Back analysis of a diaphragm wall supported excavation in London clay, Proc. 2nd Conf. Ground Movement, Cardiff 1980, 17.
42. M.J. CREED, J.M. O'BRIEN, Simplified finite element analysis of an embedded retaining·wall. Proc. 10th ECSMFE Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 687-690.
43. R.A. DAY, D.M. POTTS, Modelling sheet-pile retaining walls, Computers and Geotechnics, 15, 125-143, 1993.
44. L. DELATTRE, H. JOSSEAUME, L. MESPOULHE, T. DELMER, Comparison of classical calculation methods applied to anchored retaining structures, [in French], Bull. LPC, 205, 77-90, 1996.
45. F. DELMAS, M. GANDAIS, P. HABIB, H. JOSSEAUME, M.P. LUONG. Behaviour of a diaphragm wall [in French], Proc. 9th ICSMFE Tokyo 1977, Vol. 2, 43-46.
46. E. DEMBICKI, Active and passive earth pressure [in French], Arkady, Warszawa 1979.
47. E. DI BIAGIO, J.A. ROTI, Earth pressure measurements on a braced slurry-trench wall in soft clay, Proc. 5th ECSMFE Madrid 1972, Vol. 1, 473-483.
48. F.L. DI MAGGIO, I.S. SANDLER, Material model for granular soils, Jour. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 935-950, 1971.
49. A. DHOUIB, Methods based on subgrade reaction coefficient used in France to design retaining walls: parameters study [in French], Revue Fr. Géot., 72, 11-21, 1995.
50. J.M. DŁUŻEWSKI, Numerical modelling of soil-structure interaction in consolidation problems. Wyd. PW, Budownictwo, No. 123/1993.
51. J.M. DLUŻEWSKI, Numerical modelling of soil-structure interaction between diaphgram walls, foundation slabs and surrounding soil [in French], Inżynieria i Budownictwo, No. 3/1997, 159-162.
52. J.M. DŁUŻEWSKI, HYDRO-GEO, FE software for geotechnics, hydrotechnics and environmental engineering [in French], Wyd. PW 1997.
53. D.C. DRUCKER, R.E. GIBSON, D.J. HENKEL, Soil mechanics and work-hardeening theories of plasticity Trans. ASCE, 122, 338-346, 1957.
54. D.C. DRUCKER, W. PRAGER, Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design, Q. Application Mathematics, 10, 157-165, 1952.
55. A. DUBOUCHET, Software development: CESAR [in French], Bull. LCP, 178, 1992.
56 J.M. DUNCAN, The role of advnced constitutive relations in practical applications, Proc. 13th ECSMFE, New-Dehli 1994, Vol. 5, 31-48.
57. M. DYSLI, A. FONTANA, J. RYSIBAR, Slurry wall in clayed silt: computation and observations [in French], Proc. 7th ECSMFE, Brighton 1979, Vol. 3, 197-205.
58. M. DYSLI, A. FONTANA, Deformations around the excavations in clayey soil, Proc. Int. Symp. Numerical Models in Geomechanics, Zurich 1982, 634-642.
59. M. DYSLI, A. FONTANA, Deformations around excavation in compressives soils [in French], Ingénieurs et Architectes Suisses, 12, 1-7, 1988.
60. P. EGGER, Influence of wall stiffness and anchor prestressing on earth pressure distribution, Proc. 5th ECSMFE Madrid 1972, Vol. 1, 2·59-264.
61. R. FAGES, C. BOUYAT, Diaphragm wall and sheet-pile wall calculation - mathematical model integrating irreversible soil behaviour in elasto-plastic state. Example - parameters study [in French] Travaux, 441, 38-46, 1971.
62. B. FÉLIX, R. FRANK, M. KUTNIAK, F.E.M. calculations of a diaphragm wall, influence of the initial pressures and of contact laws, Proc. I. Sym. Geom., Zürich 1982, 643-652.
63. E. FLAVIGNY, Soli models used in PLAXIS calculations [in French], Pratique des elements finis dans géotechnique, Paris 1999.
64. A. FONTANA, I. PICHOLLET, Displacements around large excavation [in French], Proc. 10th ECSMFE Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 703-706.
65. C.J. FORD, C.J. CANDLER, F.R.D. CHARTRES, The monitoring and back-analysis of large retaining wall in Lias Clay, Proc. 10th ECSMFE Firenze 1991, Vol. 2, 707-710.
66. A.B. FOURIE, D.M. POTTS, The estimation of design bending moments for retaining walls using FEM, Proc. 6th IC Num. Meth. in Geom., Innsbruck 1988, Vol. 2, 1101-1107.
67. A.B. FOURIE, D.M. POTTS, Comparison of FEM and limiting equilibrium analyses for an embedded contilever retaining wall, Gèotechnique, 39, 2, 175-188, 1989.
68. J.P. GIGAN, Experiments on sheet-pile walls tied-back by active ground anchors [in French], Bull. LPC, 129, 5-20, 1984.
69. C. GILBERT, A new approach for soil-structure interaction [in French], Revue Française de Géotechnique, 72, 3-20, 1995.
70. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, FEM in static subsoil analysis [in Polish], Zeszyty Naukowe WSI Opole, No. 2/1975.
71. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, Analytical and numerical subsoil models for soil foundation interaction problems, Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 16, 29-72, 1994.
72. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, P. JURCZYK, Subsoil models assessment [in Polish], Inżynieria i Budownictwo, 2, 98-104, 1995.
73. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, Introducion to elasto-plastic soil models [in Polish], Wyd. KILiW PAN, IPPT PAN, Studia z zakresu inżynierii, 40, 156, 1995.
74. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, On calibration of [in French], [in Polish], Konf. Sekcji MGSiF, KILiW PAN Zesz. Nauk. P.Śl., Budownictwo, 80, 37-52, 1995.
75. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, Numerical modelling of soil behaviour – parameter limitation, Theme lecture, International Workshop PARCOMWASTE, Warsaw 1997.
76. M. GRYCZMAŃSKl, Theory of geotechnics, Theme report [in Polish], XI Konferencja Mechaniki Gruntów, Fundamentowania, Gdańsk 1997, 1-18.
77. M. GRYCZMAŃSKI, 75 years of soil mechanics evolution [in Polish], Jub. Ses. Nauk pośw. 70-leciu Prof. Grabowskiego IDiM PW, SG KILiW PAN, Warszawa 2000, 87-119.
78. M.J. GUNN, A. SATKUNANANTHAN, C.R.I. CLAYTON, Finite element modelling of installation effects. Retaining Structures, London 1993, Thomas Telford, 46-55.
79. S. HATA, S. YOSHIDA, H. OHTA, H. KITAMURA, H. HONDA, A deep excavation in soft clay - Performance of an anchored diaphram wall, Proc. 5th IC Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Nagoya 1985, Vol. 2, 725-730.
80. H. IZUMI, K. KAMEMURA, S. SATO, Finite element analysis of stresses and movements in excavations, Proc. 2nd IC Numerical Meth. in Geom., Blacksburg 1976, Vol. 2,701-712.
81. R.G. JAMES, B. SMITH, P.L. BRANSBY, The prevision of stresses and deformations in a sand mass adjacent to a retaining wall, Proc. 5th ECSMFE, Madrid 1972, Vol. 1, 39-46.
82. R.J. JARDINE, D.M. POTTS, H.D. ST.-JOHN, D.W. HIGHT, Some practical applications of a non-linear ground model, Proc. 10th ECSMFE, Firenze 1991, Vol. 1, 223-228.
83. H. JOSSEAUME, Bibliographical study retaining structures design methods [in French], Bull. LPC, 72, 177-212, 1974.
84. H. JOSSEAUME, R. STENNE, Experimental study of anchored diaphragm wall [in French], Revue Française de Géotechnique, 8, 51-64, 1977.
85. H. JOSSEAUME, L. DELATTRE, L. MESPHOULE, Interpretation of the behaviour of the test sheet-pile wall in Hochstetten using subgrade reaction calculation [in French], Revue Française de Gćotechnique, 79/1997, 59-72.
86. J. KÉRISEL, J. ROBERT, F. SCHLOSSER, I. JURAN, G. CAUSSE, C. ROMON, Experimentation multi-anchored retaining wall [in French], Proc. 10th ECSMFE, Stockolm 1981, Vol. 2, 157-160.
87. B. KŁOSIŃSKI, A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, D. SZYMCZUK, Diaphragm wall designing recommendations, Qualified version, IBDiM 1991, 49.
88. T.W. KLYM, C.F. LEE, F. DEBIDIN, Heave measurements within a large excavation, Proc. 9th ICSFE, Tokyo 1977, Vol. 3, 103-108.
89. C.C. LADD, R. FOOTT, K. ISHIHARA, F. SCHLOSSER, H.G. POULOS, Stress-Deformation and Strength Characteristics. Proc. 9th ICSMFE, Tokyo 1977, Vol. 3,421-459.
90. A. LLORET, A. LEDESMA, Finite element analysis of deformation of unsaturated soils, Barcelona 1993, Civil Engineering European Courses.
91. A. LLORET, E. ALONSO, State surface for partially saturated soils, Proc. 10th ICSMFE, San Francisco 1985, 557-562.
92. M. LONDEZ, S. NAMUR, P. SCHMITT, Analysis of measured deflections of a diaphragm wall in Colombes [in French], Proc. 14th ECSMFE, Hamburg 1997, Vol. 2, 1323-1326.
93. J.-P. MAGNAN, Shear strength [in French], Raport interne LCPC 1991, 191.
94. R. MARCHE, Pile compression in flexion caused by the soil layers which it intersects [in French], École Polytechnique de Lausanne 1974, Thèse de doctorat.
95. F. MASROURI, R. KASTNER, Experiments on retaining wall models; confrontation with different calculation methods [in French], Revue Fr. de Géotechnique, 55, 17-33, 1991.
96. L. MÉNARD, G. BOURDON, A. HOUY, Experimental study of the embedded wall in function of pressuremeter soil test results [in French], Soil, Sols, 9, 1964.
97. L. MÉNARD, G. BOURDON, Calculations of retaining structures. New method based on real surrounding conditions [in French], Soil, Sols, 12, 1965.
98. P. MESTAT, Geotextiles behaviour rules - FE modelling [in French], LCPC Paris 1993, GT52, 193.
99. P. MESTAT, FEM mesh for geotechnical structures - recommendations [in French], Bull. LPC, 212, 39-64, 1997.
100. P. MESTAT, Druker-Prager soil model [in French], Revue Fr. du Génie Civil, 7, 367-371, 1997.
101. P. MESTAT, FE constitutive soil models and non linear convergence problems [in French], Bull. LPC, 214, 45-60, 1998.
102. M. MITEW, A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, M. WOJNAROWICZ, Retaining wall displacements analysis [in Polish], Inż. i Bud., 6, 351-354, 1999.
103. O. MOHR, Welche umstände Bedingen die Elastizitätsgrenze und den Bruch eines Materials, Zlet. Ver. Deutsches Ingenieurs, 1900.
104. J. MONNET, R. KASTNER, P. LARÉAL, C. BOUYAT, FEM calculation and experimenting on the Saxe-Gambetta station, Proc. 5th IC. Num. Meth. in Geom., Nagoya 1985, Vol. 2, 747-753.
105. A. MONNET, Subgrade reaction modulus, decompression ratio, about parameters used for elasto-plastic computation of retaining walls [in French], Revue Fran. Géotechnique, 66, 67-72, 1994.
106. A. MONNET, T. CHEMAA, Theoretical and experimental study of the static equilibrium of the cohesive soil around pressumeter [in French], Revue Fr. Géotech., 73, 15-26, 1994.
107. J. MONNET, J. KHLIF, C. BIARD, The diaphragm wall Le Mall experimental and numerical study [in French], Proc. 1.3th CIMSTF, New Delhi 1994, Vol. 2, 839-844.
108. C.W.W. NG, R.W.M. YAN, Stress transfer and deformation mechanisms around a diaphragm wall panel, Proc. Jour. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng., 124, 7, 638-648, 1998.
109. R. NOVA, A model of soil behaviour in plastic and hysteresic ranges, Int. Workshop on Constitutive Behaviour of Soils, Grenoble 1982, 289-309.
110. C.-Y. OU, D.-C. CHIOU, T.-S. WU, Three-dimensional finite element analysis of deep excavations. Proc. ASCE, Jour. Geotech. Eng. Div., 122, 5, 337-345, 1996.
111. C.J. PADFIELD, R.J. MAIR, Design of retaining walls embedded in stiff clay, London 1984. CIRIA Rapport 104, 146.
112. R.B. PECK, Earth pressures measurements in open cuts Chicago subway, Trans. ASCE, 108, 1008-1036, 1943.
113. R.B. PECK, Deep excavations and tunnelling in, soft ground - State of the art report, Proc. 7th ECSMFE Mexico 1969, Vol. State of the art, 225-290.
114. R.B. PECK, Soil-structure interaction, Proc. ASCE Special Conf. Perf. Earth & Earth Supp. Struct. (Purdue Univ.), New York 1972, Vol. 2,145-154.
115. D.M. POTTS, A.B. FOURIE, The behaviour of a propped retaining wall: results of a numerical experiment, Géotechnique, 34, 3, 383-404, 1984.
116. D.M. POTTS, A.B. FOURIE, The effect of wall stiffness on the behaviour of a propped retaining wall, Géeotechnique, 35, 3, 347-352, 1985.
117. W. POWRIE, E.S. LI, Finite element analyses of an in-situ wall propped at formation level, Géotechnique, 41, 4, 499-514, 1991.
118. J.H. PREVOST, K. HÖEG, Effective stress-strain-strength model for soil, Journal Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 101, GT3, 717-732, 1975.
119. W. PRÓSZYŃSKI, M. WOŹNIAK, Geodesic research into the exeavation wall and surrounding buildings displacements [in Polish], Inżynieria i Budownictwo, 12, 688-693, 1998.
120. G. RAKOWSKI, A. KACPRZYK, FEM in structural mechanics [in Polish], Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa 1993.
121. D.J. RICHARDS, W. POWRIE, Finite element analysis of construction sequences for propped retaining walls, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Geotech. Eng., 107, 207-216, 1994.
122. K.H. ROSCOE, J.B. BURLAND, On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of "wet" clay, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1968, 535-608.
123. P. ROSSIGNOL, M.-J. GENIN, Design of diaphragm wall with PA ROIS softsware. Examples of applications [in French], Travaux, 465, 65-67, 1973.
124. P.W. ROWE, Anchored sheet pile walls, Proc. Inst. Civil Engs., l, 27-70, 1952.
125. T. SCHANZ, P.G. BONNIER, Verification of a soil model with predicted behavior of a sheet pile wall, Conf. Comp. Meth. and Advances in Geomechanics, Yuan 1997, 953-959.
126. P. SCHMITT, Estimating the coefficient of subgrade reaction for diaphragm wall and sheet pile wall design [in French], Revue Fr. de Géotechnique, 71, 3-10, 1995.
127. P. SCHMITT, From elasticity to subgrade modulus: theoretical and experimental orders of magnitude [in French], Revue Française de Géotechnique, 85, 79-87, 1998.
128. A.N. SCHOFIELD, C.P. WROTH, Critical state soil mechanics, McGraw Hill, 1968.
129. H.F. SCHWEIGER, Deep excavations in soft soil - Finite element analysis and in-situ measurements. Proc. 3rd EC Numerical Meth. in Geotech. Eng., Manchester 1994, 369-376.
130. H.F. SCHWEIGER, M. FREISEDER, Three dimensional finite element analysis of diaphragm wall construction, Proc. 8th IC Computer Method Advances in Geomechanics, Morgantown 1994, Vol. 3, 2493-2498.
131. H.F. SCHWEIGER, M. FREISEDER, H. BREYMANN, Deep excavation in soft ground - In situ measurements and numerical predictions, Proc. 14th ECSMFE, Hamburg 1997, Vol.1, 589-594.
132. Y. SHAO, E.J. MACARI, Finite element analysis for designing braced diaphragm walls, Proc. 19th IC Computer Meth. Adv. Geomech., Wuhan 1997, Vol. 3, 1881-1886_
133 A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, Designing of retaining walls for deep excavations in France [in French], Rapport interne LCPC, Paris 1997, 38.
134. A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, M. MITEW, J, KAZMIERCZAK, M. WOJNAROWICZ, B. SKWARLIŃSKI, Warsaw: Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. tower [in French], Travaux 759/1999, 18-22,
135. A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, Anchored diaphragm wall and surrounding surface displacements analysis [in Polish], IDiM PW, SG KILiW PAN, Warszawa 2000, 105-112.
136. A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, FEM analysis of anchored diaphragm wall protecting harbour quay [in Polish], Inżynieria i Budownictwo, 7, 386-389, 2000.
137. A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, M. WOJNAROWICZ, Analysis of anchored diaphragm wall for Saski Bussines Park in Warsaw [in Polish], Inż. M i Geot., 3, 133-136, 2000.
138. A. SIEMIŃSKA-LEWANDOWSKA, K. GRZEGORZEWICZ, The assessment of displacements of anchored diaphragm walls of Centrum and Świętokrzyska underground stations [in Polish], IC Underground Constructions, Kraków 2000, 456-464.
139. G.C. SILLS, J.B. BURLAND, M.K. CZECHOWSKI, Behaviour of an anchored diaphragm wall in, stiff clay, Proc. 9th ICSMFE Tokyo 1977, Vol. 3,147-154.
140. B. SIMON, Comments relating to the choice of the coefficient of subgrade reaction for the design of earth retaining structures [in French], Revue Française de Géotechnique, 71, 11-19, 1995
141. B. SIMPSON, An approach to limit state calculation in geotechnics, Ground Engineering, 14, 6, 21-28, 1981.
142. B. SIMPSON, Partial factors of safety for the design of retaining walls, Géotechnique, 42, 1,131-136, 1992.
143. B. SIMPSON, Retaining structures: displacement and design, Géotechnique, 42, 4, 541-576, 1992.
144. A. STRECT, 23 Jahre Baugrundforschung in der Hannoverschen Versuchanstalt für Grundbau und Wasserbau Franzius Institut, Hannover 1950.
145. D. STROH, H. BRETH, Deformation of deep excavations, Proc. 2nd IC Num. Methods in Geomechanics, Blacksburg 1976, Vol. 2, 686-700.
146. I.F. SYMONS, D.R. CARDER, The behaviour in service of a propped retaining wall embedded in stiff clay, Proc. 10th ECSMFE Firenze 1991, Vol. 2,761-766,
147. K. TERZAGHI, Theoretical soil mechanics, New York 1943.
148. K. TERZAGHI, Liner-plate tunnels on the Chicago Subway, Trans. ASCE, 108/1943, 970-1007
149. K. TERZAGHI, Evaliuation of coefficients of subgrade reactions, Géotechnique, 4, 1955,
150. K. TERZAGHI, R.B. PECK, Soil mechanics for civil engineering [in French], Dunod, Paris 1957
151. G.P. TSCHEBOTARIOFF, Soil mechanics, foundation and earth structures, McGraw-Hill, London 1951, 655.
152. K. WINKLER, Die Lehre von der Elastizitat und Festigkeit, Dominicus, Prague 1867.
153. Z. WIŁUN, Soil mechanics in foundation engineering [in Polish], Wydawnictwa K i Ł, Warszawa 1976.
154. A. WEISSENBACH, Soil mechanics [in German], teil II, III, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin 1977.
155. L.A. WOOD, F. LIN, The displacement of a diaphragm wall in London clay, Proc. 13th ICSMFE, New Delhi 1994, 1713-1716.
156. L. WYSOKIŃSKI, W. KOTLICKI, E. MOTAK, Geotechnical problems occurring during construction in urban areas [in Polish], Inżynieria i Budownictwo, 10, 579-583, 1999,
157. Y. VERDEYEN, V. ROISIN, J. NUYENS, Soil mechanic application [in French], Vol. 2, Dunod, Paris 1971.
158. P.A. VERMEER, A double hardening model for sand, Géotechnique, 28, 413-433, 1978.
159. P. VÉZOLE, Retaining walls, Ground - Structure interaction about the reaction coefficient method [in French], Revue Française de Géotechnique 71/1995, 31-37.
160. O.C. ZIENKIEWICZ, The finite element method [in Polish], Arkady, Warszawa 1972.
161. O.C. ZIENKIEWICZ, R.J. TAYLOR, The finite element method, Vol. 1, McGraw-Hill, London 1989.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BTB2-0013-0060