Interrupter valve kinematics in the issues of parameter estimation of the respiratory system model

• Autorzy: Jabłoński I. , Mroczka J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The latest papers have been suggesting that the dynamics of transient state should be taken into account as the phenomena which occur in a respiratory system are interpreted (quantitatively and qualitatively). The infuence of geometry and closure valve characteristic on the precision of obtained estimators of its parameters has been analyzed in the paper for the chosen model structure of the system. Results of simulation studies show that minimalization of mean-squared uncertainty dMSE of the model elements estimation is obtained as valve closing (opening) time is shortened and its complete closure time is extended so that a linear increase in pressure Pao is included.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pulmonary mechanics; interrupter technique; indirect measurement; valve characteristics

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 14, nr 3
• Strony: 339--350
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jabłoński I.

autor

Mroczka J.

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Chair of Electronic and Photonic Metrology, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Frey U., Kraemer R.: Interrelationship between postocclusional oscillatory pressure transients and standard lung function in healthy and asthmatic children. Pediatr. Pulmonol., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 379-388, 1995.
• 2. Frey U., Schibler A., Kraemer R.: Pressure oscillations after flow interruption in relation to lung mechanics. Respir. Physiol., vol. 102, no. 2-3, pp. 225-237, 1995.
• 3. Frey U., Suki B., Kraemer R., Jackson A. C.: Human respiratory input impedance between 32 and 800 Hz measured by interrupter technique and forced oscillations. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 1018-1023, 1997.
• 4. Jabłoński I., Polak A. G., Mroczka J.: Methods of identification of a model for the respiratory system during airflow interruption. PAK, vol. 8, pp. 18-22, 2000. (in Polish)
• 5. Bates J. H. T., Baconnier P., Milic-Emili J.: A theoretical analysis of interrupter technique for measuring respiratory mechanics. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 2204-2214, 1988.
• 6. DuBois A. B., Brody A. W., Lewis D. H., Burgess B. F. Jr.: Oscillation mechanics of lungs and chest in man. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 587-594, 1956.
• 7. Lutchen K. R., Yang K., Kaczka D. W., Suki B.: Optimal ventilator waveform for estimating low frequency mechanical impedance. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 478-488, 1993.
• 8. Tantucci C., Duguet A., Ferreti A., Mehiri S., Arnulf I., Zelter M., Similowski T., Derenne J-P., Milic-Emili J.: Effect of negative expiratory pressure on respiratory system flow resistance in awake snorers and nonsnorers. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 969-976, 1999.
• 9. Schmidt M., Foitzik B., Hochmuth O., Schmalisch G.: In vitro investigations of jet-pulses for the measurement of respiratory impedance in newborns. Eur. Respir. J., vol., 14, no. 5, pp. 1156-1162, 1999.
• 10. Neergaard J. von, Wirz K.: Die Messung der Strömungswiderstände in den Atemwegen des Menschen, insbesondere bei Astma und Emphysem. Z. Klin. Med., vol. 105, pp. 51-82, 1927.
• 11. Kessler V., Mols G., Bernhard H., Haberthür C., Guttmann J.: Interrupter airway and tissue resistance: errors caused by valve properties and respiratory system compliance. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1546-1554, 1999.
• 12. Romero P. V., Sato J., Shardonofsky F., Bates J. H. T.: High frequency characteristics of respiratory mechanics determined by flow interruption. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1682-1688, 1990.
• 13. Jabłoński I.: Metrological analysis of the airflow interrupter technique in the respiratory system properties investigations. PhD thesis, Wrocław, 2004. (in Polish)
• 14. Jabłoński I., Mroczka J.: Computer-aided evaluation of a new interrupter algorithm in respiratory mechanics measurement. Biocyb. & Biomed. Eng., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 33-47, 2006.
• 15. Jabłoński I., Mroczka J.: A station for the respiratory mechanics measurement by occlusion techniques. Metrol. & Meas. Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 229-240, 2007.
• 16. Frey U., Silverman M., Kraemer R., Jackson A. C.: High-frequency respiratory input impedance measurements in infants assessed by the high speed interrupter technique. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 148-158, 1998.
• 17. Mead J., Whittenberger J. L.: Evaluation of airway interruption technique as a method for measuring pulmonary air-flow resistance. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 408-416, 1954.
• 18. Lutchen K. R., Jackson A. C.: Confidence bounds on respiratory mechanical properties estimated from transfer versus input impedance in humans versus dogs. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 644-651, 1992.
• 19. Lutchen K. R., Costa K. D.: Physiological interpretations based on lumped element models fit to respiratory impedance data: use of forward-inverse modeling. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1076-1085, 1990.
• 20. Clarke J. R., Jaeger M. J., Zumrick J. L., O’Bryan R., Spaur W. H.: Respiratory resistance from 1 to 46 ATA measured with the interrupter technique. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 549-555, 1982.
• 21. Freezer N. J., Lanteri C. J., Sly P. D.: Effect of pulmonary blood flow on measurements of respiratory mechanics using the interrupter technique. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 1083-1088, 1993.
• 22. Oswald-Mammosser M., Llerena C., Speich J. P., Donato L., Lonsdorfer J.: Measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique in healthy and asthmatic children. Pediatr. Pulmonol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 78-85, 1997.
• 23. Clements J. A., Sharp J. T., Johnson R. P., Elam J. O.: Estimation of pulmonary resistance by repetitive interruption of airflow. J. Clin. Invest., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1262-1270, 1959.
• 24. Knudson R. J., Mead J., Knudson D. E.: Contribution of airway collapseto supramaximal expiratory flows. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 264-268, 1974.
• 25. Gottfried S. B., Rossi A., Higgs B. D., Calverley P. M. A., Zocchi L., Bozic C., Milic-Emili J.: Noninvasive determination of respiratory system mechanics during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 414-420, 1985.
• 26. Bates J. H. T., Hunter I. W., Sly P. D., Okubo S., Filialtrault S., Milic-Emili J.: Effect of valve closure time on determination of respiratory resistance by flow interruption. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 136-140, 1987.
• 27. Bates J. H. T., Brown K. A., Kochi T.: Respiratory mechanics in the normal dog determined by expiratory flow interruption. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2276-2285, 1989.
• 28. Liistro G., Stănescu D., Rodenstein D., Veriter C.: Reassessment of the interruption technique for measuring flow resistance in humans. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 933-937, 1989.
• 29. Vooren P. H., Zomeren Van B. C.: Reference values of total respiratory resistance, determined with the “opening” interruption technique. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 966-971, 1989.
• 30. Chowienczyk P. J., Lawson C. P., Lane S. Johnson R., Wilson N., Silverman M., Cochrane G. M.: A flow interruption device for measurement of airway resistance. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 623-628, 1991.
• 31. Fletcher M. E., Dezateux C. A., Stocks J.: Respiratory compliance in infants – a preliminary evaluation of the multiple interrupter technique. Pediatr. Pulmonol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 118-125, 1992.
• 32. Hultzsch W., Lipowsky G.: Intrapulmonale Druckmessungen bei Hochfrequenzbeatmung extrem kleiner Fruhgeborener. Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd., vol. 140, pp. 476-482, 1992.
• 33. Smith P. G., Falahat A., Carlo W. A.: Measurement of interrupter resistance in rabbits exposed to methacholine aerosols. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2454-2457, 1992.
• 34. Phagoo S. B., Watson R. A., Pride N. B., Silverman M.: Accuracy and sensitivity of the interrupter technique for measuring the response to bronchial challenge in normal subjects. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 996-1003, 1993.
• 35. Altena Van R., Gimeno F.: Respiratory resistance measured by flow-interruption in a normal population. Respiration, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 249-254, 1994.
• 36. Carter E. R., Stacenko A. A., Pollock B. H., Jaeger M. J.: Evaluation of the interrupter technique for the use of assessing airway obstruction in children. Pediatr. Pulmonol., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 211-217, 1994.
• 37. Frey U., Kraemer R.: Interrelationship between postocclusional oscillatory pressure transients and standard lung function in healthy and asthmatic children. Pediatr. Pulmonol., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 379-388, 1995.
• 38. Ginzburg I., Elad D.: Dynamic model of the bronchial tree. J. Biomed. Eng., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 283-288, 1993.
• 39. Bates J. H. T., Abe T., Romero P. V., Sato J.: Measurement of alveolar pressure in closed-chest dogs during flow interruption. J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 488-492, 1989.
• 40. Frey U., Kraemer R.: Oscillatory pressure transients after flow interruption during bronchial challenge test in children. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75-81, 1997.
• 41. Phagoo S. B., Wilson N. M., Silverman M.: Evaluation of a new interrupter device for measuring bronchial responsiveness and response to bronchodilator in 3 year old children. Eur. Respir. J., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1374-1380, 1996.