Fractal variations of the Transcarpathians, West Ukraine, seismicity and their potential relation to changing phases of local seismic cycles

• Autorzy: Gnyp A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The evolution of spatial arrangement of the Transcarpathian earthquakes is studied by means of fractal analysis. Spatial correlation dimension is evaluated for a subset of fixed number of catalogue events consecutively shifted in time by one event forward. Distinctive patterns that may be related to different phases of local seismic cycle/cycles have been identified, corresponding to extreme values of the dimension. Their potential relation to evolution of the seismogenic stress field is discussed. The time it takes for the capacity dimension to reach the so-called percolation threshold is estimated for a subset consecutively extended by adding next catalogue events. Temporal and spatial frames of percolation analysis are discussed in relation to parameters of the future earthquake.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

seismicity; fractals; percolation; seismic cycle; seismogenic stress

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 55, no. 3
• Strony: 288--301

Twórcy

autor

Gnyp A.

• Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine,

Bibliografia

• Bowman, D.D., and G.C.P. King, 2001a, Accelerating seismicity and stress accumulation before large earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4039-4042.
• Bowman, D.D., and G.C.P. King, 2001b, Stress transfer and seismicity changes before large earthquakes, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des planets 333, 591-599.
• Bune, V.I., and G.P. Gorshkov (eds.), 1980, Seismic zoning of the territory of the USSR. Methodic principles and regional description of the 1978 map, Izd. Nauka, Moscow, 97-107 (in Russian).
• De Rubeis, V., P. Dimitriu, E. Papadimitriou and P. Tosi, 1993, Recurrent patterns in the spatial behavior of Italian seismicity revealed by the fractal approach, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1911-1914.
• Dimitriu, P.P., E.M. Scordilis and V.G. Karacostas, 2000, Multifractal analysis of the Arnea, Greece, seismicity with potential implications for earthquake prediction, Natural Hazards 21, 277-295.
• Eckmann, J.P., and D. Ruelle, 1992, Fundamental limitations for estimating dimensions and Lyapunov exponents in dynamical systems, Physica D 56, 185-187.
• Gnyp, A., 2006, Fractal features of the Transcarpathians, West Ukraine, seismicity. In: Proc. Shevchenko Scientific Society, Geophysics 17, 82-106 (in Ukrainian).
• Gnyp, A.R., and T.Z. Verbitskiy, 2005, Some peculiarities of spatial and temporal distribution of seismicity in the Transcarpathians. In: V.I. Starostenko (ed.), "Studies of recent geodynamics of the Ukrainian Carpathians", Kyiv, 87-102 (in Ukrainian).
• Gnyp, A.R., T.Z. Verbitskiy, R.S. Pronishyn, O.M. Novotna, I.M. Nishchimenko and I.I. Yarema, 2005, Studies of the spatial and temporal structure of seismic activity of the Zakarpattya (=Transcarpathians) using Morishita indices, Geophys. J. 27, 655-666 (in Ukrainian).
• Grassberger, P., 1983, Generalized dimensions of strange attractors, Phys. Lett. A 97, 227-230.
• Grassberger, P., and I. Procaccia, 1983, Measuring the strangeness of attractors, Physica D 9, 189-208.
• Havstad, J.W., and C.L. Ehlers, 1989, Attractor dimension of nonstationary dynamical systems from small data sets, Phys. Rev. A 39, 845-853.
• Kagan, Y.Y., and L. Knopoff, 1980, Spatial distribution of earthquakes: the two-point correlation function, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 62, 303-320.
• King, G.C.P., 1983, The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the Earth and other solids by self-similar fault systems: the geometrical origin of b-value, Pure Appl. Geophys. 121, 761-815.
• King, G.C.P., and D.D. Bowman, 2003, The evolution of regional seismicity between large earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. B2 108, 2096, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000783.
• Kostiuk, O., E. Sahalova and I. Rudenska, 1997, Catalogue of earthquakes of the Carpathian region for the period of 1091-1990. In: Proc. Shevchenko Scientific Society, Geology and Geophysics 1, 121-137 (in Ukrainian).
• Kutas, V.V., I.M. Rudenskaya and I.A. Kalitova, 1999, Carpathian hodograph of P and S waves and lithospheric inhomogeneities, Geophys. J. 21, 45-55 (in Russian).
• Main, I.G., 1988, Prediction of failure times in the Earth for a time-varying stress, Geophys. J. 92, 455-464.
• Mandelbrot, B.B., 1977, The fractal geometry of nature, Freeman, New York. Martinez, V.J., 1999, Is the universe fractal?, Science 284, 445-446.
• Murray, N., and M. Holman, 1999, The origin of chaos in the outer solar system, Science 283, 1877-81.
• Pronishyn, R.S., and B.G. Pustovitenko, 1981, Peculiarities of processes in the epicentral zone of the Transcarpathian earthquakes in 1979, Geophys. J. 3, 71-85 (in Russian).
• Pronishyn, R.S., and B.G. Pustovitenko, 1982, Some aspects of seismic "climate and weather" in the Transcarpathians, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Solid Earth 18, 74-81 (in Russian).
• Sadovskiy, M.A., T.V. Golubeva, V.F. Pisarenko and M.G. Shnirman, 1984, Characteristic dimensions of rock and hierarchy properties of seismicity, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Solid Earth 20, 87-96 (English translation).
• Sahimi, M., M.C. Robertson and C.G. Sammis, 1992, Relation between the earthquake statistics and fault patterns, and fractals and percolation, Physica A 151, 57-68.