The Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer SUMO. Recent developments and applications of a micro-UAS for atmospheric boundary layer research

• Autorzy: Reuder J. , Jonnassen M. , Olafsson H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

During the last 5 years, the Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer SUMO has been developed as a flexible tool for atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) research to be operated as sounding system for the lowest 4 km of the atmosphere. Recently two main technical improvements have been accomplished. The integration of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) into the Paparazzi autopilot system has expanded the environmental conditions for SUMO operation. The implementation of a 5-hole probe for determining the 3D flow vector with 100 Hz resolution and a faster temperature sensor has enhanced the measurement capabilities. Results from two recent field campaigns are presented. During the first one, in Denmark, the potential of the system to study the effects of wind turbines on ABL turbulence was shown. During the second one, the BLLAST field campaign at the foothills of the Pyrenees, SUMO data proved to be highly valuable for studying the processes of the afternoon transition of the convective boundary layer.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

atmospheric boundary layer; unmanned aircraft system; BLLAST field campaign; wind farm; turbulence; morning cooling

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, no. 5
• Strony: 1454--1473
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Reuder J.

autor

Jonnassen M.

autor

Olafsson H.

• Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway,

Bibliografia

• Aeroprobe (2012), On-The-Fly! Air Data System User’s Manual, Revision F, 1/2012, http://www.aeroprobe.com/uploads/On-The-Fly_Manual_RevF.docx (last accessed 03.02.2012).
• BLLAST (2011), BLLAST 2011 Experimental Plans, http://bllast.sedoo.fr/campaigns/2011/Experimental-plans-document_v8.pdf (last accessed 15.01.2012).
• Brisset, P., A. Drouin, M. Gorraz, P.-S. Huard, and J. Tyler (2006), The Paparazzi solution, http://www.recherche.enac.fr/paparazzi/papers2006/mav06paparazzi.pdf.
• Curry, J.A., J. Maslanik, G. Holland, and J. Pinto (2004), Applications of Aerosondes in the Arctic, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 12, 1855-1861, DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-85-12-1855.
• Egger, J., S. Bajrachaya, R. Heinrich, P. Kolb, S. Lämmlein, M. Mech, J. Reuder, W. Schäper, P. Shakya, J. Schween, and H. Wendt (2002), Diurnal winds in the Himalayan Kali Gandaki Valley. Part III: Remotely piloted aircraft soundings, Monthly Weath. Rev. 130, 8, 2042-2058, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493 (2002)130<2042:DWITHK>2.0.CO;2.
• Egger, J., L. Blacutt, F. Ghezzi, R. Heinrich, P. Kolb, S. Lämmlein, M. Leeb, S. Meyer, E. Palenque, J. Reuder, W. Schäper, J. Schween, R. Torrez, and F. Zaratti (2005), Diurnal circulation of the Bolivian Altiplano. Part I: Observations, Monthly Weath. Rev. 133, 4, 911-924, DOI: 10.1175/MWR2894.1.
• ENAC (2008), Paparazzi User’s Manual, http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki images/Users manual.pdf (last accessed 15.01.2012).
• Holland, G.J., P.J. Webster, J.A. Curry, G. Tyrell, D. Gauntlett, G. Brett, J. Becker, R. Hoag, and W. Vaglienti (2001), The Aerosonde robotic aircraft: A new paradigm for environmental observations, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 889.
• Inoue, J., and J.A. Curry (2004), Application of Aerosondes to high-resolution observations of sea surface temperature over Barrow Canyon, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L14312, DOI: 10.1029/2004GL020336.
• Janjic, Z. (2002), Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP meso models, NCEP Office Note No. 437, 61 pp.
• Kleissl, J., R.E. Honrath, M.P. Dziobak, D. Tanner, M. Val Martın, R.C. Owen, and D. Helmig (2007), Occurrence of upslope flows at the Pico mountaintop observatory: A case study of orographic flows on a small, volcanic island, J. Geopys. Res. 112, D10S35, DOI: 10.1029/2006JD007565.
• Konrad, T.G., M.L. Hill, J.R. Rowland, and J.H. Meyer (1970), A small, radiocontrolled aircraft as a platform for meteorological sensors, APL Tech. Dig. 10, 11-19.
• Kristjánsson, J.E., I. Barstad, T. Aspelien, I. Føre, Ø. Godøy, Ø. Hov, E. Irvine, T. Iversen, E. Kolstad, T.E. Nordeng, H. McInnes, R. Randriamampianina, J. Reuder, Ø. Saetra, M. Shapiro, T. Spengler, and H. Ólafsson (2012), The Norwegian IPY-THORPEX: Polar lows and Arctic fronts during the 2008 Andøya campaign, Bull. Am. Metorol. Soc. 92, 11, 1443-1466.
• Ma, S., H. Chen, G. Wang, Y. Pan, and Q. Li (2004), A miniature robotic plane meteorological sounding system, Adv. Atmos. Sci. 21, 6, 890-896.
• Mayer, S., A. Sandvik, M. Jonassen, and J. Reuder (2010), Atmospheric profiling with the UAS SUMO: a new perspective for the evaluation of fine-scale atmospheric models, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. DOI: 10.1007/s00703-010-0063-2.
• Mayer, S., G. Hattenberger, P. Brisset, M. Jonassen, and J. Reuder (2012), A “noflow-sensor” wind estimation algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Systems, Int. J. Micro Air Vehicles 4, 1, 15-30, DOI: 10.1260/1756-8293.4.1.15.
• Ramanathan, V., M.V. Ramana, G. Roberts, D. Kim, C. Corrigan, C. Chung, and D. Winker (2007), Warming trends in Asia amplified by brown cloud solar absorption, Nature 448, 575-578, DOI: 10.1038/nature06019.
• Reuder, J., P. Brisset, M. Jonassen, M. Müller, and S. Mayer (2009), The Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer SUMO: A new tool for atmospheric boundary layer research, Meteorol. Z. 18, 2, 141-147, DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0363.
• Reuder, J., M. Ablinger, H. Ágústsson, P. Brisset, S. Brynjólfsson, M. Garhammer, T. Jóhannesson, M.O. Jonassen, R. Kühnel, S. Lämmlein, T. de Lange, C. Lindenberg, S. Malardel, S. Mayer, M. Müller, H. Olafsson, O. Rögnvaldsson, W. Schäper, T. Spengler, G. Zängl, and J. Egger (2011), FLOHOF 2007: An overview of the mesoscale meteorological field campaign at Hofsjökull, Central Iceland, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 116, 1-2, 1-13, DOI: 10.1007/s00703-010-0118-4.
• Serafin, S., and D. Zardi (2011), Daytime development of the boundary layer over a plain and in a valley under fair weather conditions: A comparison by means of idealized numerical simulations, J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 9, 2128-2141, DOI: 10.1175/2011JAS3610.1.
• Skamarock, W.C., J.B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D.O. Gill, D.M. Barker, W. Wang, and J.G. Powers (2005), A description of the advanced research WRF version 2, NCAR Tech. Notes 468.
• Spengler, T., M. Ablinger, J.H. Schween, G. Zängl, and J. Egger (2009), Thermally driven flows at an asymmetric valley exit: Observations and model studies at the Lech Valley exit, Monthly Weath. Rev. 137, 10, 3437-3455, DOI: 10.1175/ 2009MWR2779.1.
• Spiess, T., J. Bange, M. Buschmann, and P. Vörsmann (2007), First application of the meteorological Mini-UAV M2AV, Meteorol. Z. 16, 2, 159-169, DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2007/0195.
• van den Kroonenberg, A., T. Martin, M. Buschmann, J. Bange, and P. Vörsmann (2008), Measuring the wind vector using the autonomous mini aerial vehicle M2AV, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 25, 1969-1981, DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA1114.1.
• van den Kroonenberg, A., S. Martin, F. Beyrich, and J. Bange (2011), Spatiallyaveraged temperature structure parameter over a heterogeneous surface measured by an unmanned aerial vehicle, Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 142, 1, 55-77, DOI: 10.1007/s10546-011-9662-9.
• Weigel, A.P., and M.W. Rotach (2004), Flow structure and turbulence characteristics of the daytime atmosphere in a steep and narrow Alpine valley, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 2605-2627, DOI: 10.1256/qj.03.214.