Rail and multimodal freight: a problem-oriented survey (part II-1)

• Autorzy: Marinov M.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Kolejowe przewózki towarów: problemowo orientowany przegląd (część II-1)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper includes a problem-oriented survey addressed at rail and multimodal freight, where the main objective is to discuss recently published works and documents dealing with drayage, rail haul, transhipment and standardisation. The general concepts are outlined and questions for further discussions are identified. Since, this work is a problem oriented survey; it does not explicitly focus on the available scientific instrumental that has been applied in dealing with rail and multimodal freight. However, throughout the description methods and approaches are addressed, where it is of interest. Please, note that this paper is the Part II-1 Problem-Oriented Surveys dedicated to rail freight issues of today.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multimodal transport; railway transport; goods transportation

PL

transport multimodalny; transport kolejowy; przewóz towarów

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: T. 4, z. 2
• Strony: 73--83
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Marinov M.

• Instituto Superior Técnico - CESUR at Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal,

Bibliografia

• 1. Crainic T. G., Damay J. and Gendreau M.: An integrated freight transportation modeling framework, ESG UQÀM, 2007.
• 2. De Jong G., Gunn H. and Walker W.: National and International Freight Transport Models: An Overview and Ideas for Future Development, Transport Reviews, 24:1, 2004, pp. 103-124. 82 M. Marinov
• 3. Bontekoning Y. M., Macharis C., and Trip J.J.: Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?-A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature, Transportation Research Part A 38, 2004, pp. 1-34.
• 4. Neuman Ch. and Smilowitz K.: Strategies for Coordinated Drayage Movements, May 9, 2002.
• 5. Ileri Yetkin 1, Mokhtar Bazaraa, Ted Gifford, George Nemhauser, Joel Sokol, Erick Wikum: An Optimization Approach for Planning Daily Drayage Operations, CEJOR (2006) 14: pp.141-156.
• 6. Namboothiri R. and Erera A. L. (2006) Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system, Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science, October.
• 7. Anthony R.: Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Harvard Graduate School of Business, Boston, 1965.
• 8. Macharis C. and Bontekoning Y. M.: Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review, European Journal of Operational Research 153, 2004, pp.400 - 416.
• 9. Caris A., Macharis C. and Janssens G. K.: Planning Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Accomplishments and Prospects, Transportation Planning and Technology 31:3, 2008, pp.277-302.
• 10. Arnold P., Peeters D. and Thomas I.: Modelling a Rail/road Intermodal Transportation System, Transportation Research Part E 40, 2004, pp. 255-270.
• 11. Sirikijpanichkul A. and H van Dam K. and Ferreira L. and Lukszo Z.: Optimizing the Location of Intermodal Freight Hubs: An Overview of Agent Based Modelling Approach. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 7(4): 2007, pp. 71-81.
• 12. Howard S. G.: Large or small terminals in intermodal transport: what is the optimum size?, Transportation Research Record No. 907, Intermodal Freight Terminal Design, 1983, Conference
• 13. Slack B.: Satellite Terminals: a local solution to hub congestion?, Journal of Transport Geography 7, 1999, pp. 241- 246.
• 14. Kreutzberger E.D.: Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe: A generic approach, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42 (7), 2008, pp. 973-993.
• 15. Wiegmans B. W., Stekelenburg D.T., Versteegt C. and Bontekoning Y.M.: Modeling Rail-rail Exchange Operations: an analysis of conventional and new-generation terminals, Transportation Journal, 2007, available on line (reviewed on Nov. 24, 2008): http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/171140039_1.html
• 16. Wiegmans B. W., Hekkert M. and Langstraat M.: Can Innovations in Rail Freight Transhipment Be Successful? Transport Reviews 27: 1, 2007, pp. 103 - 122.
• 17. Ballis A. and Golias J.: Comparative Evaluation of Existing and Innovative Rail-Road Freight, Transport Terminals, Transportation Research Part A 36, 2002, pp.593 - 611.
• 18. Bose P.: Applications of computer model techniques for railroad intermodal terminal configuration, equipment and operational planning, Transportation Research Record, 1983, pp. 907
• 19. Ballis A. and Golias J.: Towards the Improvement of a Combined Transport Chain Performance, European Journal of Operational Research 152, 2004, pp. 420-436.
• 20. Corry P. and Kozan E.: An Assignment Model for Dynamic Load Planning of Intermodal Trains, Computers & Operations Research 33, 2006, pp. 1-17.
• 21. Kozan E.: Optimum Capacity for Intermodal Container Terminals, Transportation Planning and Technology, 29:6, 2006, pp.471 - 482.
• 22. Froyland G., Koch Th., Megow N., Duane E., and Wren H.: Optimizing the Landside Operation of a Container Terminal, OR Spectrum 30, 2008, pp. 53-75.
• 23. Corry P. and Kozan E.: Optimised Loading Patterns for Intermodal Trains, OR Spectrum, Volume 30, Number 4, October, 2008, pp. 721-750.
• 24. Khoshnevis B. and Asef-Vaziri A.: 3D Virtual and Physical Simulation of Automated Container Terminal and Analysis of Impact on In Land Transportation, University of Southern California, METRANS, Transportation Center, 2000.
• 25. Lee B. K., Jung B. J., Kim K. H., Park S. O., and Seo J. H.: A simulation study for desining a rail terminal in a container port, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, L. F. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, and R. M. Fujimoto, eds. Rail and multimodal freight: a problem-oriented survey (Part II-1) 83
• 26. Duinkerken M. B., Dekker R., Kurstjens S. T. G. L., Ottjes J. A., and Dellaert N. P.: Comparing transportation systems for inter-terminal transport at the Maasvlakte container terminals, OR Spectrum 28, 2006, pp. 469-493.
• 27. Hassall K.: Simulating the Impact of New Australian “bi-modal” Urban Freight Terminals, utilizing performance based standard freight vehicles for high growth container ports, in the Proceedings of the TRANSLU’08, Bucharest, Romania, 2008.
• 28. Iannone F., Thore S. and Forte E.: Inland container logistics and interports. Goals and features of an ongoing applied research, Italian Society of Transport Economists - Ninth Scientific Meeting - Naples, October 3-5, 2007 (Electronic copy, consulted on Nov 25, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1149723 ).
• 29. COM: Commission of the European Communities, Communication form the Commission, Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan, Brussels, 18.10.2007, 607 final.
• 30. Kölble Ch.: New Technologies Increase Efficiency in Intermodal Transport, Conference paper, 4rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità / Ascona, March 25-26, 2004.
• 31. Rubinovitz R.: The Role of Fixed Cost Savings in Merger Analysis, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 00, 2008, pp. 1-15.