Rapid earthquake hazard and loss assessment for Euro-Mediterranean region

• Autorzy: Erdik M. , Sesetyan K. , Demircioglu M. , Hancilar U. , Zulfikar C. , Cakti E. , Kamer Y. , Yenidogan C. , Tuzun C. , Cagnan Z. , Harmandar E
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The almost-real time estimation of ground shaking and losses after a major earthquake in the Euro-Mediterranean region was performed in the framework of the Joint Research Activity 3 (JRA-3) component of the EU FP6 Project entitled "Network of Research Infra-structures for European Seismology, NERIES". This project consists of finding the most likely location of the earthquake source by estimating the fault rupture parameters on the basis of rapid inversion of data from on-line regional broadband stations. It also includes an estimation of the spatial distribution of selected site-specific ground motion parameters at engineering bedrock through region-specific ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) or physical simulation of ground motion. By using the Earthquake Loss Estimation Routine (ELER) software, the multi-level methodology developed for real time estimation of losses is capable of incorporating regional variability and sources of uncertainty stemming from GMPEs, fault finiteness, site modifications, inventory of physical and social elements subjected to earthquake hazard and the associated vulnerability relationships.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

rapid earthquake hazard; Euro-Mediterranean earthquakes; Earthquake Rapid Response System; seismic loss assessment

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 58, no. 5
• Strony: 855--892
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 50 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Erdik M.

autor

Sesetyan K.

autor

Demircioglu M.

autor

Hancilar U.

autor

Zulfikar C.

autor

Cakti E.

autor

Kamer Y.

autor

Yenidogan C.

autor

Tuzun C.

autor

Cagnan Z.

autor

Harmandar E

• Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Department of Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul Turkey,

Bibliografia

• Akkar, S., and J.J. Bommer (2007), Empirical prediction equations for peak Grodnu velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 97, 2, 511-530.
• ATC-13 (1985), Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Report ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
• ATC-40 (1996), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
• Atkinson, G.M., and S.I. Kaka (2006), Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion for New Madrid ShakeMaps, Carleton University, Ottawa.
• Boore, D.M., and G.M. Atkinson (2006), Boore–Atkinson NGA empirical Grodnu motion model for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and SA at spectral periods of 0.1, 0.2, 1, 2 and 3 seconds, Interim Report for USGS.
• Boore, D.M., and G.M. Atkinson (2007), Boore–Atkinson NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectra ground motion parameters, PEER Report 2007/01.
• Boore, D.M., and G.M. Atkinson (2008), Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s, Earthq. Spectra 24, 1, 99-138.
• Boore, D.M., W.B. Joyner, and T.E. Fumal (1997), Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 1, 128-153.
• Borcherdt, R.D. (1994), Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (method and justification), Earthq. Spectra 10, 4, 617-653.
• Bramerini, F., G. Di Pasquale, A. Orsini, A. Pugliese, R. Romeo, and F. Sabetta (1995), Rischio sismico del territorio italiano. Proposta per una metodologiae risultati preliminari, Rapporto tecnico del Servizio Sismico Nazionale SSN/RT/95/01, Roma (in Italian).
• Çağnan, Z., C. Zülfikar, E. Durukal, and M. Erdik (2007), Issues with the development of analytical iso-seismal (shake) maps, Report produced in connection with EU- FP6 Project: Network of research infrastructures for European seismology – NERIES – JRA3, Dept. Earthq. Engng., Bogazici University, Istanbul.
• Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2006), Campbell–Bozorgnia NGA empirical ground motion model for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and SA at selected spectral periods ranging from 0.01-10.0 seconds (version 1.1), Interim Report for USGS.
• Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2008), NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s, Earthq. Spectra 24, 1, 139-171, DOI: 10.1193/1.2857546.
• CEN, European Committee for Standardisation (2003), Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 1.1: General rules, seismic actions, and rules for buildings, Pren1998-1.
• Chiou, B., and R.R. Youngs (2008), An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthq. Spectra, 24, 1, 173-215.
• Coburn, A., and R. Spence (1992), Earthquake Protection, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, 355 pp.
• DEE-KOERI (2003), Earthquake risk assessment for the Istanbul metropolitan area, Report prepared by Dept. Earthq. Eng., Kandilli Observatory and Earth quake Research Institute, Bogazici University Press, Istanbul.
• Demircioglu, M.B., M. Erdik, U. Hancilar, K. Sesetyan, C. Tuzun, C. Yenidogan, and A.C. Zulfikar (2009), Technical manual – earthquake loss estimation routine ELER – v. 1.0, Bogazici University, Dept. Earthq. Eng., Istanbul.
• EERI (2009), Learning from earthquakes .The Mw 6.3 Abruzzo, Italy, earthquake of April 6, 2009, EERI Special Earthquake Report – June 2009.
• Elenas, A. (2003), Athens earthquake of 7 September 1999: Intensity measures and observed damages, ISET J. Earthq. Technol., Techn. Note 40, 1, 77-97.
• Erdik, M. (2002), Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Duzce (Turkey) earthquakes, Bogazici University, Dept. Earthq. Eng., Istanbul.
• Erdik, M., and N. Aydinoglu (2002), Earthquake performance and vulnerability of buildings in Turkey: Report prepared for World Bank disaster management facility, Washington, DC.
• Erdik, M., and Y. Fahjan (2006), Damage scenarios and damage evaluation. In: C.S. Oliveira, A. Roca, and X. Goula (eds.), Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk, Springer, 213-237.
• Erdik, M., N. Aydinoglu, Y. Fahjan, K. Sesetyan, M. Demircioglu, B. Siyahi, E. Durukal, C. Ozbey, Y. Biro, H. Akman, and O. Yuzugullu (2003), Earthquake Risk Assessment for Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2, 1, 1-25.
• Erdik, M., Z. Cagnan, C. Zulfikar, K. Sesetyan, M.B. Demircioglu, E. Durukal, and C. Kariptas (2008), Development of rapid earthquake loss assessment methodologies for Euro-Med region, Proc. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Being, China, Paper ID: S04-004.
• European Environment Agency (1999), CORINE Land Cover, Brussels, Belgium, http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/landuse/clc-download.
• Faccioli, E., and C. Cauzzi (2006), Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations, Proc. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September 2006, paper no. 569.
• Fajfar, P. (2000), A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design, Earthq. Spectra 16, 3, 573-591.
• FEMA (2003), HAZUS – MH technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
• FEMA&NIBS (1999), Earthquake loss estimation methodology – HAZUS 1999, Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Science, Washington, DC.
• FEMA356 (2000), NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA 356 (revised from FEMA 273/274), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
• Giardini, D., R. Bossu, T. van Eck, and S. Wiemer (2008), Networking research infrastructures for earthquake seismology in Europe, EOS Trans. AGU 89, 24, 219.
• Giovinazzi, S., and S. Lagomarsino (2004), A macroseismic model for the vulnerability assessment of buildings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
• Grünthal, G. (ed.) (1998), European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg 15, 1-99.
• IBC (2006), International Building Council, International Code Council, USA.
• Kaka, S.I., and G.M. Atkinson (2004), Relationships between instrumental groundmotion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in eastern North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 5, 1728-1736.
• Krinitzsky, E.L., and W.F. Marcuson (1983), Principles for selecting earthquake motions in engineering design, Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 20, 253-265.
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Giovinazzi (2006), Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4, 4, 415-443.
• Murphy, J.R., and J.L. O’Brien (1977), The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 877-915.
• READY, Real-time earthquake assessment disaster system in Yokohama, http://www.city.yokohama.jp/me/bousai/eq/index.html.
• RGELFE (1992), Estimating Losses from Earthquakes in China in the Forthcoming 50 years, Research Group for Estimating Losses from Future Earthquakes (RGELFE), State Seismological Bureau, Seismological Press, Beijing.
• RISK-UE (2001-2004), An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns, Research Project, European Commission, DG ΧΙI2001-2004, CEC Contract Number: EVK4-CT-2000-00014.
• Samardjieva, E., and J. Badal (2002), Estimation of the expected number of casualties caused by strong earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 6, 2310-2322.
• Sesetyan, K., E. Durukal, M. Demircioglu, and M. Erdik (2005), A revised intensity attenuation relationship for Turkey, poster presentation, European Geosci-ences Union General Assembly 2005, Vienna, Austria, abstrakt no. 7-05037.
• Spence, R., A. Coburn, and A. Pomonis (1992), Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale, Proc. Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, 1, 551-556.
• Trifunac, M.D., and A.G. Brady (1975), On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1, 139-162.
• Vacareanu, R., D. Lungu, C. Arion, and A. Aldea (2004), WP7 Report: Seismic Risk Scenarios. Risk – UE Project. An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications, http://www.risk-ue.net.
• Wald, D.J., B.C. Worden, V. Quitoriano, and K.L. Pankow (2005), ShakeMap manual: technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide, U.S. Geological Survey, 132 pp.
• Wald, D.J., V. Quitoriano, T.H. Heaton, and H. Kanamori (1999), Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity for earthquakes in California, Earthq. Spectra 15, 3, 557-564.
• Wang, H. (1995), The physical measure of seismic intensity, Proc. Fifth Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, 1189-1196.