Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method

• Autorzy: Zavadskas E. K. , Turskis Z. , Vilutiene T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Analiza wielowymiarowa alternatywnego usadowienia fundamentu przy użyciu metody oszacowania współczynnika addytywności (ARAS)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents the process of selection the foundation instalment alternative, which have to be the most appropriate and safe for building which stands on the aquiferous soil. The selection is based on a set of criteria: costs of instalment, instalment duration, the complexity of decisions, advantages and disadvantages of decisions, transferability and maintainability of installed foundation system, past experience implementing the approved decisions, etc. The criteria for evaluation and their importance are selected by taking into consideration the interests and goals of the client as well as factors that influence the efficiency of construction process and safety of future building. The solution of problem was made by applying Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method. The proposed technique could further be applied to substantiate the selection of effective alternative of structures, technologies, investments and etc.

PL

Artykuł prezentuje proces wyboru alternatywnego usadowienia fundamentu najbardziej odpowiedniego i bezpiecznego dla budynku stojącego na gruncie wodonośnym. Wybór bazuje na zestawie kryteriów: koszt usadowienia, okres usadowienia, stopień skomplikowania decyzji, zalety i wady decyzji, możliwość przenoszenia i konserwacji usadowionego systemu fundamentu, doświadczenie z wdrożenie przyjętych decyzji, itd. Kryteria oceny i ich znaczenie są wybierane z uwzględnieniem interesów i celów klienta oraz czynników wpływających na efektywność procesu budowlanego i bezpieczeństwa budynku. Rozwiązania problemu dokonano przy zastosowaniu metody ARAS. Proponowana metoda może w przyszłości być zastosowana do uzasadnienia wyboru struktury, technologii, inwestycji itd.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

foundation; selection; evaluation; decision making; alternative; weights; operation research; multiple criteria; MCDM; Additive Ratio ASsessment; ARAS

PL

fundacja; wybór; oceny; podejmowanie decyzji; badania operacyjne; fundamenty

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 10, no 3
• Strony: 123--141
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 71 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Zavadskas E. K.

autor

Turskis Z.

autor

Vilutiene T.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• [1] Langston C., Wong F.K.W., Hui E.C.M., Shen L.-Y.: Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong, Building and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1709–1718.
• [2] Chusid M.: Once is never enough, Building Renovation, Mar.–Apr., 1993, pp. 17–20.
• [3] Kapliński O.: Usefulness and credibility of scoring methods in construction industry, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008, pp. 21–28.
• [4] Turskis Z., Zavadskas E.K., Peldschus F.: Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, No. 1, 2009, pp. 7–17.
• [5] Roy B.: Decision science or decision-aid science, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, 1993, pp. 184–203.
• [6] Ackoff R.: The future of operational research is past, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1979, pp. 93–104.
• [7] Brauers W.K., Zavadskas E.K.: Robustness of the multi-objective MOORA method with a test for the facilities sector, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, pp. 352–375.
• [8] Eden C., Sims D.: On the nature of problems in consulting practice, OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1979, pp. 119–127.
• [9] Lombera J.-T. S.-J., Rojo J.C.: Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2010, pp. 438–447.
• [10] Lombera J.-T. S.-J., Aprea I.G.: A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings, Building and Environment, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2009, pp. 673–683.
• [11] Juan Y.-K., Gao P., Wang J.: A hybrid decision support system for sustainable Office building renovation and energy performance improvement, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2010, pp. 290–297.
• [12] Popov V., Juocevicius V., Migilinskas D., Ustinovichius L., Mikalauskas S.: The use of a virtual building design and construction model for developing an effective project koncept in 5D environment, Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2010, pp. 357–367.
• [13] Kaminski M.M., Szafran J.: Random eigenvibrations of elastic structures by the response function method and the generalized stochastic perturbation technique, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2009, pp. 5–32.
• [14] Gronostajska B.: The affect of human feelings on creation of housing, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2008, pp. 109–119.
• [15] Shevchenko G., Ustinovichius L., Andruškevičius A.: Multi-attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2008, pp. 428–443.
• [16] Kapliński O., Tamošaitienė J.: Game theory applications in construction engineering and management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2010, pp. 348–363.
• [17] Zavadskas E.K.: History and evolving trends of construction colloquia on sustainability and operational research, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 578–592.
• [18] Kapliński O.: Planning instruments in construction management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 449–451.
• [19] Kapliński O.: Development and usefulness of planning techniques and decision-making foundations on the example of construction enterprises in Poland, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 492–502.
• [20] Peldschus F.: Experience of the game theory application in construction management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 531–545.
• [21] Ginevičius R., Podvezko V.: Multicriteria graphical-analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 452–461.
• [22] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008, pp. 181–187.
• [23] Kalibatas D., Turskis Z.: Multicriteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method, Information Technology and Control, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2008, pp. 79–83.
• [24] Ustinovichius L., Zavadskas E.K., Podvezko V.: Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investment in construction, Control and Cybernetics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2007, pp. 251–268.
• [25] Ustinovichius L., Barvidas A., Vishnevskaja A., Ashikhmin I.V.: Multicriteria verbal analysis for the decision of construction problems, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, pp. 326–340.
• [26] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z.: A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2010, pp. 159–172.
• [27] Liaudanskiene R., Ustinovicius L., Bogdanovicius A.: Evaluation of construction process safety solutions using the TOPSIS method, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, No. 4, 2009, pp. 32–40.
• [28] Sobotka A., Rolak Z.: Multi-attribute analysis for the eco-energetic assessment of the building life cycle, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, pp. 593–611.
• [29] Błaszczyk T., Nowak M.: The time-cost trade-off analysis in construction project Rusing computer simulation and interactive procedure, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, pp. 523–539.
• [30] Turskis Z.: Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2008, pp. 224–239.
• [31] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z., Kalibatas D.: An approach to multi-attributeassessment of indoor environment before and after refurbishment of dwellings, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2009, pp. 5–11.
• [32] Sivilevičius H., Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z.: Quality attributes and complex assessment methodology of the asphalt mixing plant, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2008, pp. 161–166.
• [33] Ginevicius R., Podvezko V., Raslanas S.: Evaluating the alternative solutions of Wall insulation by multicriteria methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 217–226.
• [34] Keeney R.L., Raiffa H.: Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1976.
• [35] Seo F.: Organizational aspects of multicriteria decision making, in: Lecture Notes In Economics and Mathematical System, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1981, pp. 363–379.
• [36] Saaty T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, 1977, pp. 234–281.
• [37] Meuthe M., Scanella G.: Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, No. 2, 2001, pp. 246–262.
• [38] MacCrimon K.R.: Decision marking among multiple–attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach, RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 1968.
• [39] Guitoni A., Martel J.M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method, European Journal of Operational Research, No. 109, 1998, pp. 501–521.
• [40] Podvezko V., Podviezko A.: Dependence of multi-criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010, pp. 143–158.
• [41] Larichev О.: Decision-making theory and methods, Мoscow: Logos (in Russian), 2000.
• [42] Hwang C.L., Yoon K.: Multiple attribute decision making, [in:] Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
• [43] Srinivasan V., Shocker A.D.: Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of privileged, Psychometrika, Vol. 38, 1973, pp. 337–369.
• [44] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A.: Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment, [in:] D.A. Langford, A. Retik (Eds.) International Symposium for “The Organisation and Management of Construction”. Shaping Theory and Practice, Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk, CIB W 65; London, Weinheim, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras, London: E and FN SPON, 1996, pp. 94–104.
• [45] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Vlutienė T.: Multicriteria evaluation of apartment blocks maintenance contractors: lithuanian case study, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2009, pp. 319–338.
• [46] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z., Tamošaitienė J.: Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2008, pp. 85−93.
• [47] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Multi-attribute decisionmaking model by applying grey numbers, Informatica, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2009, pp. 305–320.
• [48] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamošaitienė K., Marina V.: Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 462–477.
• [49] Zimmermann H.-J.: An application-oriented view of modelling uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2000, pp. 190–198.
• [50] Roy B.: Decision-aid and decision-making, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 45, 1990, pp. 324–331.
• [51] Brans J.P., Mareschal B., Vincke P.: PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, [in:] J.P. Brans, (Ed.), IFORS 84, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 477–490.
• [52] Jacquet-Lagreze E., Siskos J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1982, pp. 151–164.
• [53] Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y.: Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 143, No. 1, 2002, pp. 148–170.
• [54] Bous G., Fortemps P., Glineur F., Pirlot M.: ACUTA: A novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements, European Journal of Operational Research, No. 206, 2010, pp. 435–444.
• [55] Vansnick J.C.: On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the moncompensatory approach), European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, 1986, pp. 288–294.
• [56] Roubens M.: Preference relations on actions and criteria in multi-criteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1982, pp. 51–55.
• [57] Berkeley D., Humphreys P., Larichev O., Moshkovich H.: Aiding strategic decision making: Derivation and development of ASTRIDA, [in:] Y. Vecsenyi, H. Sol (Eds.), Environment for Supporting Decision Processes, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.
• [58] Zavadskas E.K., Liias R., Turskis Z.: Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: state-of-the-art surveys, The Balic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2008, pp. 152–160.
• [59] Zavadskas E.K.: Multiple criteria evaluation of technological decisions of construction (in Russian), Dissertation of Dr. Sc. Moscow Civil Engineering Institute, Moscow, 1987.
• [60] Hovanov N.: Analysis and synthesis of parameters under information deficiency, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 1996, pp. 11–22.
• [61] Peldschus F.: The analysis of the quality of the results obtained with the methods of multicriteria decisions, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009, pp. 580–592.
• [62] Peldschus F.: The effectiveness of assessment in multiple criteria decisions, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 5–6, 2007, pp. 519–526.
• [63] Ginevičius R., Podvezko V.: Multicriteria evaluation of lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2008, pp. 257–267.
• [64] Ginevičius R.: Normalization of quantities of various dimensions, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 79–86.
• [65] Noarul Haq A., Kannan G.A.: Hybrid normalised multi criteria decision making for the vendor selection in a supply chain model, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 5–6, 2007, pp. 601–622.
• [66] Thiel T.: Determination of the relative importance of criteria when the number of people judging is a small sample, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 566–577.
• [67] Vaidogas E.R., Juocevicius V.: Sustainable development and major industrial accidents: the beneficial role of risk-oriented structural engineering, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 612–627.
• [68] Vaidogas E.R., Juocevicius V.: Reliability of a timber structure exposed to fire: estimation using fragility function, Mechanika, No. 5, 2008, pp. 35–42.
• [69] Schabowicz K., Hola B.: Application of artificial neural networks in predicting earthmoving machinery effectiveness ratios, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2008, pp. 73–84.
• [70] Zavadskas E.K., Vaidogas E.R.: Multiattribute selection from alternative designs of infrastructure components for accidental situations, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2009, pp. 346–358.
• [71] Vaidogas E.R., Juocevicius V.: Assessment of structures subjected to accidental actions using crisp and uncertain fragility functions, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–104.