A decision support system using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and TOPSIS approaches for selection of the optimum underground mining method

• Autorzy: Mikaeil R. , Naghadehi M. Z. , Ataei M. , Khalokakaie R.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wspomaganie procesów decyzyjnych w oparciu o procedury rozmyte FAHP (Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process) i TOPSIS przy doborze optymalnych metod wydobycia w kopalniach podziemnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Selection of an appropriate mining method is a complex task that requires consideration of many technical, economical, political, social, and historical factors. The aim of this paper is developing a hierarchical model to selection the optimum mining method with the use of effective and major criteria and simultaneously, taking subjective judgments of decision makers into consideration. Proposed approach is based on the combination of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method with TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods. FAHP is used in determining of the weights of the criteria by decision makers and then rankings of the methods are determined by TOPSIS. The proposed method is applied for Jajarm Bauxite Mine in Iran and finally the most appropriate mining methods for this mine are ranked.

PL

Dobór odpowiednich metod wydobycia jest zagadnieniem złożonym i wymaga uwzględnienia szeregu czynników technicznych, ekonomicznych, politycznych, społecznych i historycznych. Celem pracy jest opracowanie modelu hierarchicznego dla doboru optymalnej metody wydobycia w oparciu o kryteria główne, uwzględniając także subiektywne oceny osób podejmujących decyzje. Proponowane podejście wykorzystuje metodę hierarchii procesów z wykorzystaniem procedur rozmytych (FAHP) w połączeniu z metodą TOPSIS, polegającą na określeniu "odległości" od rozwiązania idealnego. Metoda FAHP służy do określania współczynników wagi dla poszczególnych kryteriów decyzyjnych, następnie ranking metod przeprowadzany jest w oparciu o metodę TOPSIS. Proponowana metoda stosowana jest w kopalni Jajarz Bauxite w Iranie, służąc przy doborze odpowiednich metod wydobycia.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mining method selection; multi-criteria decision making; FAHP; TOPSIS

PL

wybór metod wydobycia; wielokryterialne procesy decyzyjne; FAHP; TOPSIS

• Wydawca: Instytut Mechaniki Górotworu PAN
• Czasopismo: Archives of Mining Sciences
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 54, no 2
• Strony: 341--368
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Mikaeil R.

autor

Naghadehi M. Z.

autor

Ataei M.

autor

Khalokakaie R.

• Faculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran,

Bibliografia

• Acaroglu O., Ergin H., Eskikaya S., 2006. Analytical hierarchy process for selection of roadheaders, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 106(8), 569-575.
• Ataei M., 2005. Multicriteria selection for alumina-cement plant location in East-Azerbaijan province of Iran, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 105(7), 507-514.
• Ayag Z., Ozdemir R.G., 2006. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives, Journal of Inteligent Manufacturing, 17, 179-190.
• Bascetin A., 2004. An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine, Mining Technology. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. A 113, A192- A199.
• Basligil H., 2005. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for software selection problems, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2, 24-33.
• Benitez J.M., Martin J.C., Roman C., 2007. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry, Tourism Management, 28(2), 544-555.
• Bentivegna V., Mondini G., Nati Poltri F., Pii R., 1994. Complex evaluation methods. An operative synthesis on Multicriteria techniques, In: Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Engineering Management, Melbourne.
• Bojadziev G., Bojadziev M., 1998. Fuzzy sets fuzzy logic applications, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
• Bozdag C.E., Kahraman C., Ruan D., 2003. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems, Computer in Industry, 51, 13-29.
• Buckley J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247.
• Chan F.T.S., Kumar N., 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 35, 417-431.
• Chang D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
• Chang Y.H., Cheng C.H., Wang T.C., 2003. Performance evaluation of international airports in the region of east Asia, In Proceedings of Eastern Asia Society for transportation studies (Vol. 4, pp. 213-230).
• Chen C.T., Lin C.T., Huang S.F., 2006. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 102, 289-301.
• Chou T.Y., Liang G.S., 2001. Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for shipping company performance evaluation, Maritime Policy & Management, 28(4), 375-392.
• Deng H., 1999. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231.
• Enea M., Piazza T., 2004. Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making (Vol. 3). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 39-62.
• Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N., 2006. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection and an application in a textile company, In Proceedings of 5th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing systems, 195-207.
• Ertugrul I., Tus A., 2007. Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile fi rm, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 6, 29-49.
• Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N., (In Press). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications.
• Gu X., Zhu Q., 2006. Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space, Decision Support Systems, 41, 400-410.
• Haq A.N., Kannan G., 2006. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, 29, 826-835.
• Hartman H.L., 1992. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. Littleton, Colorado, 2nd Edition, Vol. 1.
• Hartman H.L., Mutmansky J.M., 2002. Introductory Mining Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
• Hsieh T.Y., Lu S.T., Tzeng G.H., 2004. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings, International Journal of Project Management, 22, 573-584.
• Hwang C.L., Yoon K., 1981. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Berlin: Springer.
• Kahraman C., 2001. Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy cash flows, In: Ruan, D., Kacprzyk J., Fedrizzi M. (Eds.), Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management: Applications in Technology, Environment and Finance. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 375-396.
• Kahraman C., Ruan D., Tolga E., 2002. Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic Cash flows, Information Sciences 42 (1-4), 57-76.
• Kahraman C., Ruan D., & Dogan I., 2003. Fuzzy group decision making for facility location selection, Information Sciences, 157, 135-153.
• Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ulukan Z., 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394.
• Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ruan D., 2004. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 171-184.
• Kazakidis V., Mayer N., Scoble M.J., 2004. Decision making using the analytic hierarchy process in mining engineering, Mining Technology. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. A 113, A30-A42.
• Lai Y.J., Hwang C.L., 1996. Fuzzy multiple objective decision making. Berlin: Springer.
• Leung L., Cao D., 2000. Theory and methodology in consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 102-113.
• Mikhailov L., Tsvetinov P., 2004. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Applied Soft Computing, 5, 23-33.
• Roscelli R., 1990. Misurarenell incertezza, Celid, Torino.
• Saaty T. L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G., 1990. The Analytic Hierarchy Process series, University of Pittsburg.
• Samanta B., Sarkar B., Murherjee S.K.: Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process, Mining Technology. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. A 111, A136-A142 (2002)
• Tang Y., & Beynon M.J., 2005. Application and development of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process within a capital investment study, Journal of Economics and Management, 1(2), 207-230.
• Tang L.L., Kuo Y.C., Lee E.S., 2005. A multi-objective model for Taiwan notebook computer distribution problem, In Y.-C. Lan (Ed.), Global integrated supply chain systems (pp. 171). Hershey, PA, USA: Idea Group Publishing.
• Tolga E., Demircan M., Kahraman C., 2005. Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 89-117.
• Tsaur S.H., Chang T.Y., Yen C.H., 2002. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, 23, 107-115.
• Tuysuz F., Kahraman C., 2006. Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: an application to information technology projects, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21, 229-284.
• Van Laarhoven P.J.M., Pedrcyz W., 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.
• Wang M.Y., Elhag T.M.S., 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 309-319.
• Wang T.C., Chen Y.H., 2007. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection, Omega, the International Journal of Management Science, 35, 384-388.
• Wang Y.J., 2008. Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 1837-1845.
• Yoon K., Hwang C.L., 1985. Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part II. Multiplant strategy and plant relocation, International Journal of Production Research, 23(2), 361-370.
• Zadeh L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
• Zhu K., Jing Y., Chang D., 1999. A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 450-456.