A model for risk analysis of oil tankers

• Autorzy: Montewka J. , Krata P. , Goerlandt F. , Kujala P.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Model oceny ryzyka statków do przewozu ropy naftowej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents a model for risk analysis regarding marine traffic, with the emphasis on two types of the most common marine accidents which are: collision and grounding. The focus is on oil tankers as these pose the highest environmental risk. A case study in selected areas of Gulf of Finland in ice free conditions is presented. The model utilizes a well-founded formula for risk calculation, which combines the probability of an unwanted event with its consequences. Thus the model is regarded a block type model, consisting of blocks for the probability of collision and grounding estimation respectively as well as blocks for consequences of an accident modelling. Probability of vessbl colliding is assessed by means of a Minimum Distance To Collision (MDTC) based model. The model defines in anovel way the collision zone, using mathematical ship motion model and recognizes traffic flow as a non homogeneous process. The presented calculations address waterways crossing between Helsinki and Tallinn, where dense cross traffic during certain hours is observed. For assessment of, a grounding probability, a new approach is proposed, which utilizes a newly developed model, where spatial interactions between objects in different locations are recognized. A, ship at a seaway and navigational obstructions may be perceived as interacting objects and their repulsion may be modelled by a sort of deterministic formulation. Risk due to tankers running aground addresses an approach fairway to an oil terminal in Skoldvik, near Helsinki. [...]

PL

W artykule przedstawiono model oceny ryzyka w transporcie morskim, w aspekcie kolizji statków oraz wejść na mieliznę. W modelu przyjęto jeden typ statków, tankowce do przewozu ropy naftowej, z uwagi na fakt, iż w przypadku wystąpienia kolizji lub kontaktu z dnem statek ten może stanowić bardzo poważne zagrożenie dla środowiska. W pracy przedstawiono dwa nowatorskie podejścia do modelowania prawdopodobieństwa wystąpienia powyższych wypadków. Model do oceny prawdopodobieństwa kolizji statków definiuje w nowy sposób strefę kolizji, w oparciu o właściwości manewrowe statku oraz jego hydrodynamikę. Intensywność ruchu morskiego na analizowanym akwenie modelowana jest w oparciu o proces niestacjonarny, w przeciwieństwie do istniejących modeli. Model oceny prawdopodobieństwa wejścia na mieliznę wykorzystuje model grawitacyjny, który wyznacza bezpieczny obszar manewrowy dla danego statku i danego akwenu. W modelu tym statek i otaczające go płycizny traktowane są jako masy, wzajemnie na siebie oddziaływujące. Obydwa modele wykorzystują dane o ruchu statków zarejestrowane w systemie automatycznej identyfikacji statków (AIS). Analiza ryzyka przeprowadzona została dla dwóch wybranych akwenów w Zatoce Fińskiej. Jako konsekwencje wypadku przyjęto model kosztów, skonstruowany w oparciu o dane statystyczne z międzynarodowego funduszu IOPCF, który pokrywa koszty w związku z rozlewem olejowym na morzu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maritime risk; maritime transportation; collision; grounding; modelling; tankers; oil spill; Gulf of Finland

PL

transport morski; ryzyko w transporcie morskim; tankowce; ocena ryzyka; kolizja statków; model oceny ryzyka

• Wydawca: Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 4
• Strony: 423--445
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Montewka J.

autor

Krata P.

autor

Goerlandt F.

autor

Kujala P.

• Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Finland; Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Aven T.: On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95(06), pp. 623-631, 2010.
• 2. Barrass C.B.: Ship design and performance for masters and mates. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004.
• 3. Clark I.: Ship dynamics for mariners. London, The Nautical Institute, 2005.
• 4. Det Norske Veritas. Formal Safety Assessment - Large Passenger Ships, ANNEX II: Risk Assessment - Large Passenger Ships - Navigation, 2003.
• 5. Duffey R.B, Saull J.W.: Managing Risk. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008.
• 6. Fowler T.G, Sorgård E.: Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis 20(2), pp. 225-244, 2000.
• 7. Fujii Y., Shiobara R.: The analysis of traffic accidents. The Journal of Navigation 24(4), pp. 534-543, 1971.
• 8. Fujii Y., Yamanouchi H., Matui T.: Survey on vessel traffic management systems and brief introduction to marine traffic studies. Electronic Navigation Research Institute Papers 45, pp. 1-48, 1984.
• 9. Fujii Y., Yamanouchi H., Tanaka K., Yamada K., Okuyama Y., Hirano S.: The behaviour of ships in limited waters. Electronic Navigation Research Institute Papers 19, pp. 1-14, 1978.
• 10. Fujii Y., Yamanouchi H., and Mizuki N.: On the fundamentals of marine traffic control. Part 1 probabilities of collision and evasive actions. Electronic Navigation Research Institute Papers 2, pp. 1-16, 1970.
• 11. Goerlandt F., Kujala P.: Modeling of Ship Collision Probability using Dynamic Traffic Simulation. In proceedings of ESREL'10 conference, Rhodes, 2010.
• 12. Goodwin E.: A statistical study of ship domain. The Journal of Navigation 28, pp. 328-344, 1975.
• 13. Gucma L.: Models of ship's traffic flow for the safety of marine engineering structures evaluation. In: Beford, van Gelder, editors. Proceedings of ESREL 2003, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 713-718, 2003.
• 14. Hänninen M., Kujala P.: The effects of causation probability on the ship collision statistics in the Gulf of Finland. In: Weintrit A, editor. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 267-272, 2009.
• 15. IMO, Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1978 relating to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 (Revised Annex I of MARPOL 73/78), resolution MEPC.117(52), 2004.
• 16. IMO, Interim Guidelines for approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex I of MARPOL 73/78, Resolution MEPC.66(37), 1995.
• 17. Jiankang W., Lee T.S., Shu C.: Numerical study of wave interaction generated by two ships moving parallely in shallow water. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190(15-17), pp. 2099-2110, 2001.
• 18. Jurdzinski M.: Navigational planning in restricted waterways. Maritime University of Gdynia, Publishing House of Maritime University of Gdynia, 1998 (in Polish).
• 19. Kao S., Lee K., Chang K., Ko M.: A fuzzy logic method for collision avoidance in Vessel Traffic Service. The Journal of Navigation 60, 01, pp. 17-31, 2007.
• 20. Klanac A., Duletic T., Ehlers S., Goerlandt F., Frank D.: Environmental risk of collision for enclosed seas: the Gulf of Finalnd, the Adriatic, and implications for tanker design. In proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships, Espoo, 2010.
• 21. Krata P.: A model of chosen interactions during SAR action. In: Marine Traffic Engineering 2007. Świnoujście, Maritime University of Szczecin, 2007 (in Polish).
• 22. Kristiansen S.: Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.
• 23. Kujala P., Hänninen M., Arola T. & Ylitalo J.: Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulfof Finland. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94 (8), pp. 1349-1357, 2009.
• 24. MacDuff T.: The probability of vessel collisions. Ocean Industry pp. 144-148, 1974.
• 25. Marine Board & Transport Research Board. Environmental Performance of Tanker Designs in Collision and Grounding: Method for Comparison -Special Report 259. Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 2001.
• 26. Martins M.R., Maturana M.C.: Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2010.
• 27. Merrick J.R.W., van Dorp J.R., Mazzuchi T., Harrald J.R., Spahn J.E., Grabowski M.: The Prince William Sound Risk Assessment. INTERFACES, 32 (11), pp. 25-40, 2002.
• 28. Merrick J.R.W., van Dorp J.R., Blackford J.P., Shaw G.L., Harrald J., Mazzuchi A.: A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco Bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 81(2), pp. 119-132, 2003.
• 29. Merrick J.R.W., van Dorp J.R.: Modeling risk in the dynamic environment of maritime transportation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1090-1098, 2001.
• 30. Millward A.: A preliminary design method for the prediction of squat in shallow water. Marine Technology, 27 (1), pp.10-19, 1990.
• 31. Montewka J., Hinz T., Kujala P., and Matusiak J.: Probability modelling of vessel collisions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 (5), pp. 573-589, 2010.
• 32. Montewka J., Krata P., Kujala P.: Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of oil tankers in the selected areas of the Gulf of Finland. In proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships, Espoo, 2010.
• 33. Montewka J., Krata P., Kujala P.: Selected problems of marine traffic risk modelling. In proceedings of Transport of 21st century, Technical University of Warsaw, 2010a.
• 34. Otto S., Pedersen P.T., Samuelides M., Sames P.C.: Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry. Marine Structures 15, 4-5, pp. 461-474, 2002.
• 35. Palisade Corporation. A Concise Summary of @RISK Probability Distribution Functions. Palisade Corp., NY, USA, 2002.
• 36. Pedersen P.T.: Collision and grounding mechanics. The Danish Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers pp. 125-157, 1995.
• 37. Pietrzykowski Z., Uriasz J.: The Ship Domain - A criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area. The Journal of Navigation 62, 01, pp. 93-108, 2009.
• 38. Pietrzykowski Z.: Assessment of navigational safety in vessel traffic in an open area. In: Weintrit A., editor. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 413-416, 2007.
• 39. Przywarty M.: Probabilistic model of ships navigational safety assessment on large sea areas. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Electronics in Transport, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 9-10 October 2008.
• 40. Rodrigue J.P., Comtois C. & Slack B.: The geography of transport system. 2nd ed. New York, Routledge, 2009.
• 41. Smailys V, Česnauskis M.: Estimation of expected cargo oil outflow from tanker involved in casualty. Transport Vilnius, 21 (4), pp. 293-300, 2006.
• 42. Soares C.G, Teixeira A.P.: Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 74(12), pp. 299-309, 2001.
• 43. Sofartsstyrelsen. Risk analysis for sea traffic in the area around Bornholm. COWI, Konges Lyngby, 2008.
• 44. Szłapczyński R.: A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain. The Journal of Navigation 59, 03, pp. 477-490, 2006.
• 45. Uluscu Ö.S, Özbas B., Alt|ok T., Or Ö.: Risk Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Risk Analysis, 29, pp. 1454-1472, 2009.
• 46. Van Dorp J.R., Merrick J.R.W., Harrald J., Mazzuchi T., Grabowski M.: A risk management procedure for the Washington State Ferries. Risk Analysis, 21(1), pp. 124-142, 2001.
• 47. Varyani K.S., McGregor R., Wold P.: Interactive forces and moments between several ships meeting in confined waters. Control Engineering Practice, 6(5), pp. 635-642, 1998.
• 48. Vinnem J.: Offshore Risk Assessment. 2nd ed. Springer London, 2007.
• 49. Yamada Y.: The Cost of Oil Spills from Tankers in Relation to Weight of Spilled Oil. Marine Technology, 46, pp. 219-228, 2009.