Lifting the barriers to entrepreneurial growth in transitional economy: a dialectical approach to entrepreneurial management

Bratnicki, M.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Lifting the barriers to entrepreneurial growth in transitional economy: a dialectical approach to entrepreneurial management

Autorzy

Bratnicki M.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.management-poland.com/

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Podnoszenie barier do wzrostu przedsiębiorczości w gospodarkach przejściowych: dialektyczne podejście do zarządzania przedsiębiorczego

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

I critically examine the content of contemporary understandings of entrepreneurial management and locate them within the extant body of research dealing with dialectical dynamics of management. My main purpose is to realize a theoretically informed definition of entrepreneurial management that is descriptively robust and conceptually distinct from existing concepts in the literature. Specifically, my dialectical perspective exposes the element of contradiction and conceptualize entrepreneurial management as the organizational configuration of reconciled contradictions - tightly-coupled versus loosely-coupled organizational architecture, as organizational context of entrepreneurial processes; global, technocratic, control-oriented versus local, humanistic, support-oriented, organizational design; accuracy versus high-speed information flow in entrepreneurial task execution.

Niniejsza praca krytycznie podchodzi do kwestii współczesnego rozumienia zarządzania przedsiębiorczego i umiejscawia je na tle szerokiej literatury naukowej, zajmującej się dialektyczną dynamiką zarządzania. Moim głównym celem jest realizacja opartej na solidnym fundamencie teoretycznym definicji zarządzania przedsiębiorczego, która jest wyczerpująca i konceptowo odróżniająca się od istniejących koncepcji w literaturze. W szczególności, moja perspektywa dialektyczna uwydatnia element sprzeczności i definiuje zarządzanie przedsiębiorcze jako konfigurację organizacyjną pogodzonych sprzeczności - ściśle sparowane, kontra luźno związane struktury organizacyjne jako kontekst organizacyjny procesów przedsiębiorczych; globalne, technokratyczne, opierające się na kontroli w opozycji do struktur lokalnych, kładących nacisk na człowieka, zorientowane raczej na wsparcie; dokładność w konfrontacji z szybkim przepływem informacji w wykonywaniu zadań przedsiębiorczych.

Słowa kluczowe

management dynamics of management entrepreneurial management

zarządzanie przedsiębiorcze dynamika zarządzania

Wydawca

University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management

Czasopismo

Management

Rocznik

2009

Tom

Vol. 13, no 1

Strony

7--21

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 50 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bratnicki M.

Akademia Ekonomiczna im. Karola Adamieckiego w Katowicach

Bibliografia

1. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (red.) (2003), Handbook of entrepreneurship research. An interdisciplinary survey and introduction, Kluver Academic Publishers, Boston/ Dordrecht/ London.
2. Bird, B.J. (1989), Entrepreneurial behavior, Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview.
3. Bluedorn, A.C. (2002), The human organization of time. Temporal realities and experience, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
4. Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., Bloodgood, J.M. (2002), Citizens behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations, "Academy of Management Review", nr 27: 505-522
5. Boyd, B.K., Gave, S., Hitt, M.A. (2005), Construct measurement in strategic Management Research: Illusion or reality, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 26: 239-257.
6. Bratnicki, M., Gabryś, B. (2002), Temporal Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Growth, w: M. Nowicka-Skowron i R. Lescroart (red.), Economics Aspects of Industrial Reconversion: 94-101, HECL, Virton.
7. Catlin, K., Matthews, J. (2002), Building awesome organization. Six essential components that drive entrepreneurial growth, Hungry Minds, Inc, New York.
8. Collis, D. J. (1994), Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 15 : 143-152.
9. Cornwall, J.R., Perlman, B. (1990), Organizational entrepreneurship, Irwin, Homewood.
10. Crotts, J.C., Dickson, D.R., Ford, F.C. (2005), Aligning organizational processes with mission: The case of service excellence, "Academy of Management Executive", nr 19(3): 54-68.
11. Davidsson, P. (2003), The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions, w: J.A. Katz, D.A.Shepherd (red), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, nr 6:315-372. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford.
12. Desarbo, W.S., Di Benedetto, C.A., Song, M., Sinha, I. (2005), Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 26: 47-74.
13. Dess, G.G., Newport, S., Rasheed, A.M.A. (1993), Configuration research in strategic management: Key issues and suggestions, "Journal of Management", nr 19: 775-796.
14. Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A.H. (1985), Alternatives forms of fit in contingency theory. "Administrative Science Quaterly", nr 30: 514-539.
15. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 21: 1105-1121.
16. Galunic, D. C., Eisenhardt. K. M. (2001), Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms, "Academy Management Journal", nr 44: 1229-1249.
17. Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C.A. (1994), Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 15: 91-112.
18. Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J. (2004), The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of ambidexterity, "Academy of Management Journal", nr 47: 209-226.
19. He, Z., Wong, P. (2004), Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, "Organizational Science", nr 15: 481-494.
20. Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., Sexton, D.L. (2002), Strategic entrepreneurship: Integrating entrepreneurial and strategic management perspectives, w: M.A. Hitt, R.D. Ireland, S.M. Camp, D.L. Sexton (red.), Strategic entrepreneurship. Creating a new mindset: 1-16. Blackwell, Oxford/Malden.
21. Hoskisson, R.E, Eden, L. Lau, C.M., Wright, M. (2000), Strategy in emerging economies, "Academy of Management Journal", nr 43:249-267.
22. Jacques, E. (2002), Social power and the CEO: Leadership and trust in a sustainable free enterprise system, Quorum, Westport.
23. Jennings, D.F., Hindle, K. (2004), Corporate entrepreneurship and equifinality: An empirical analysis of strategy-structure-performance, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans.
24. Katila, R., Ahuja, G. (2002), Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, "Academy of Management Journal", nr 45: 1183-1194.
25. Ketchen, D., Combs, J., Russel, C., Shook, C., Dean, M., Runge, J., Lohrke, F., Naumann, S., Haptonstahl, D., Baker, R., Beckstein, B., Handler, C., Honig, H., Lammoreaux, S. (1997), Organizational configurations and performance: A meta- analysis, "Academy of Management Journal", nr 40: 223-240.
26. Krackhardt, D. (1990), Assessing the political "landscape": Structure, cognition and power in organizations, "Administrative Science Quarterly", nr 35: 342-369.Kuratko, D. (2001), Strategic entrepreneurial growth, Harcourt College Publishers, London.
27. Likert, R. (1967), The human organization, McGraw-Hill, New York.
28. McGrath, R.G., MacMillan, I. (2000), The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
29. Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S., Hinnings, C.R. (1993), Configurational approaches to organizational analysis, "Academy of Management Journal", nr 36: 1175-1195.
30. Miles, R., Snow, C. (1978), Organizational strategy: Structure, and process, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
31. Miller, D. (1996), Configurations revisited, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 17: 505-512.
32. Miller, D., Friesen, P.H. (1984), Organizations: A quantum view, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
33. Mintzberg, H. (2002), Managing to innovate, w: F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, I. Somerwille (red.), Leading for innovation and organizing for results: 141-152. Jossey - Bass, San Francisco.
34. Morris, M.H. (1998), Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantage for individuals, organizations and societies, Quorum Books, Westport.
35. Naman, J.L., Slevin, D.P. (1993), Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 14: 137-153.
36. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. (2002), A firm as a dialectical being: Towards a dynamic theory of a firm, "Industrial and Corporate Change", nr 11: 995-1009.
37. Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1990), The core competence of the corporation, "Harvard Business Review", nr May-June: 79-91.
38. Schein, E.H. (1996), Culture: The missing concept in organizational studies, "Administrative Science Quarterly", nr 41: 229-240.
39. Schulz, W.C., Hofer, C.W. (1999), Creating value through skill-based strategy and entrepreneurial leadership, Pergamon, Amsterdam/ Lousanne/ New York/ Osford/ Singapore/ Tokyo.
40. Sexton, D.L., Landström, H. (red.) (2000), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford/ Malden.
41. Shane, S. (2003), A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual - opportunity nexu, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/ Northampton.
42. Siggelkov, N. (2002), Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences, "Management Science", nr 48: 900-916.
43. Siggelkov, N. (2003), Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall and the renaissance of Liz Clairborne, w: B. Chakravarthy, G. Mueller-Stevens, P. Lorange, C. Lerner (red.), Strategy process. Shaping the contours of the field: 46-76. Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
44. Sinha, K.K., Van de Ven, A.H. (2005), Designing work within and between organizations, "Organization Science", nr 16: 389-408.
45. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 18 (7): 509-533.
46. Thornton, P.H., Flynn, K.H. (2003), Entrepreneurship, networks, and geographies, w: Z.J. Acs, D.B. Audretsch (red.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research. An interdyscyplinary survey and introduction: 401-433. Kluver Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London.
47. Turner, C. (2002), Lead to succeed: Creating entrepreneurial organizations, Texere, New York.
48. Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H. (2002), Conclusion: Doing more in research strategy, w: A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, R. Whittington (red.), Handbook of strategy and management: 475-488, Sage Publications, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi.
49. Wickham, P.A. (2001), Strategic entrepreneurship. A decision - making approach to new venture creation and management, Financial Times/ Prentice Hall, Harlow.
50. Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D. (2005), Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach, "Journal of Business Venturing", nr 20: 71-91.51. Zajac, E.J., Kraatz, M., Bresser, R. (2000), Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change, "Strategic Management Journal", nr 21 (4): 429-483.52. Zollo, M., S.G. Winter (2002), Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, "Organization Science", nr 13: 339-351.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPZ4-0011-0001