The application of AHP approach to selection of optimum underground mining method, case study: Jajarm bauxite mine (Iran)

• Autorzy: Jamshidi J. , Ataei M. , Sereshki F , Jalali Seyed M. E.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zastosowanie techniki AHP w procesie optymalizacji wyboru metody podziemnej eksploatacji złoża, studium przypadku: Jajarm : kopalnia boksytu (Iran)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the most critical and complicated steps of designing a mine is a suitable mining method selection based upon geological, geotechnical, geo-graphical and economical parameters. Since there are many factors involved in mining method selection; the decision-making process is so difficult. In this paper, Analytical Hierarchy Proces s (AHP), with 13 criteria is used to develop a suitable mining method for the Golbini No.8 deposit in Jajarm (Iran). Six alternatives (Conventional Cut & Fili, Mechanized Cut & Fili, Shrinkage Stoping, Sublevel Stoping, Bench mining and StulI Stoping) are evaluated. The studies show that the suitable mining method for this deposit by regarding to the present situation is conventional Cut & FilI method.

PL

Jednym z kluczowych i niezwykle złożonych etapów projektowania kopalni jest dobór odpowiedniej metody prowadzenia wydobycia w oparciu o parametry geologiczne, geotechniczne, geograficzne oraz ekonomiczne. Ponieważ wybór taki wymaga uwzględniania dużej liczby czynników, proces decyzyjny staje się utrudniony. Obecna praca opisuje zastosowanie podejścia AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process - Analityczny Proces Wyboru Hierarchii) wykorzystujące 13 kryteriów w celu wyboru odpowiedniej metody eksploatacji pokładu 8 złoża Golbini w Jajarm (Iran). Ocenie poddano sześć opcji alternatywnych: wybieranie konwencjonalne z podsadzką, wybieranie mechaniczne z podsadzką, wybieranie magazynowe, wybieranie podpoziomowe, wybieranie warstwami, wybieranie z obudową rozporową). Badania wykazały, że najodpowiedniejszą metoda eksploatacji danego złoża będzie konwencjonalna metoda wybierania z podsadzką.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

decision analysis; multi-criteria decision; AHP; operation methods

PL

analiza decyzyjna; decyzje wielokryterialne; AHP; metody eksploatacji

• Wydawca: Instytut Mechaniki Górotworu PAN
• Czasopismo: Archives of Mining Sciences
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 54, no 1
• Strony: 103--117
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jamshidi J.

autor

Ataei M.

autor

Sereshki F

autor

Jalali Seyed M. E.

• Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Bibliografia

• Alpay S, Yavuz M., 2007. A decision support system for underground mining method selection, IEA/AIE, LNAI 4570/ 2007, 334-343.
• Ataei M., 2005. Multicriteria selection for alumina-cement plant location in East-Azerbaijan province of Iran, The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 105 (7), 507-514.
• Bascetin A., 2003. A decision support system for optimal equipment selection in open pit mining: analytical hierarchy process, Geology Department, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University, 16(2), 1-11.
• Bascetin A., 2004. An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine, Mining Technology, Transaction Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, A192-A199.
• Bascetin A., 2007. Decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine, Environmental Geology, 52(4), 663-672.
• Bitarafan M., Ataei M., 2004. Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools, The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 104 (9), 493-498.
• Chen C., Liu Y., 2007. A methodology for evaluation and classification of rock mass quality on tunnel engineering, 22 (4); 377-387.
• Ching L., Chao C., 2007. A new approach for application of rock mass classification on rockslope stability assessment, Journal of Engineering Geology, 89, 129-143
• Eddi W., Hang L., 2001. Analytic hierarchy process, an approach to determine measures for business performance, Measuring Business Performance, 5 (3), 30-36.
• Elkarmi F., Mustafa I., 1993. Increasing the utilization of solar energy technologies (SET) in Jordan, Energy Policy, 21, 978-984.
• Hertwich E., Pease W., Koshland C., 1997. Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: A comparison of six methods, The Science of the Total Environment, 196, 13-29.
• Kumar P., Ramcharan K., 2008. Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados, Journal of Environmental Management. In Press, Corrected Proof
• Marinoni O., 2004. Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS, Computers & Geosciences, 30(6), 637-646.
• Saaty T., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Saaty T., 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operations research, 48, 9-26.
• Sadiq R., Husain T., Veitch B., Bose N., 2004. Risk-based decision-making for drilling waste discharges using a fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique, Ocean Engineering 2004, 31(16), 1929-1953.
• Samanta B., Sarkar B., Mukherjee S., 2002. Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process, Transaction Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 111, A136-A142.
• Wedley W., 1990. Combining qualitative and quantitative factors - an analytic hierarchy approach, Socio Econ Plan Sci, 24, 114-22.
• Yavuz M., Iphar M., 2008. Once G. The optimum support design selection by using AHP method for the main haulage road in WLC Tuncbilek colliery, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, In Press, Corrected Proof.