Cognitive-oriented risk evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process

Hubig, L.; Jonen, A.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Cognitive-oriented risk evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process

Autorzy

Hubig L. , Jonen A.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.management-poland.com/

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Kognitionsorientierte Risikoevaluation unter Verwendung des Analytischen Hierarchieprozesses

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The evaluation of risks discharges very often into subjective assessments of the probability of occurrence and / or the extent of loss. These assessments show a low transparency concerning the development of the judgements and are influenced by various different cognitive effects hindering the assessing persons to better accomplish this important step in the handling of risks. The Analytic Hierachy Process [AHP] is an instrument which has especially been used in the field of strategic decision making to solve similar problems of inducing people to make their tacit knowledge explicit. This way it seems reasonable to adopt the AHP methodology for the assessment of risks. For that purpose an AHP risk evaluation model is built up on the basis of the analysis of advantages and disadvantages of existing risk evaluation models. The elaborated risk evaluation using AHP is finally founded upon the separated judgement of the risk parameters and the quantification with the concept of fixed points. The model delivers an adequate base of operations for risk regulation and reduces the problem areas of low transparency and negative impacts of cognitive effects.

Słowa kluczowe

analytic hierarchy process (AHP) risk decision making

metoda hierarchii analitycznej ryzyko podejmowanie decyzji

Wydawca

University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management

Czasopismo

Management

Rocznik

2009

Tom

Spec. ed.

Strony

118--135

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hubig L.

autor

Jonen A.

Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Chair of Management Accounting and Management Control Systems

Bibliografia

1. Apostolou, B. A.; Hassel, J. M.; Webber, S. A.; Sumners, G. E. (2001): The Relative Importance of Management Frau Risk Facors, in: Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 13, 1-24.
2. Barker, D. C.; Hansen, S. B. (2005): All Things Considered: Systematic Cognitive Processing and Electoral Decision-making, in: The Journal of Politics Vol. 67, 2, 319-344.
3. Basak, I. (1988): When to Combine Group Judgments and when not to in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Method, in: Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 10, 6, 395-404.
4. Bryson, N. (1996): Group Decision-Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Exploring the Conensus-Relevant Information Content - Centralized versus Decentralized Control, in: Computer & Operations Research, Vol. 23, 1, 27-35.
5. Cohen, M.; Jaffray, J.-Y.; Said, T. (1987): Experimental Comparison of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty for Gains and for Losses in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 39, 1-22.
6. Demski, J.; Feltham, G. A. (1976): Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach, Ames, Iowa.
7. Deshmukh, A.; Millet, I. (1998): An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Assessing the Risk of Management Fraud, in: The Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 15, 1, 87-102.
8. Dey, P. K. (2002): Project Risk Management: A combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree Approach, in: Cost Engineering, Vol. 44, 3, 13-25.
9. Dey, P. K. (2003): Analytic Hierarchy Process Analyzes Risk of Operation Cross-Country Petroleum Pipelines in India, in: Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 4, 4, 213-221.
10. Dey, P. K.; Hariharan, S.; Kumar, A. Y.; Moeseley, H. S. L. (2004): Performance Measurement of Intensive Care Services in Hospitals: the Case of Barbados, in: International Journal of Services Technology and Management, Vol. 5, 5/6, 579-595.
11. Dey, P. K.; Tabucanon, M. T.; Ogunalana, S. O. (1994): Planning for Project Control through Risk Analysis - A Petroleum Pipeline-laying Project, in: International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 12, 1, 23-33.
12. Eickemeier, S. (2002): Bestimmung der Gewichte bei Mehrzielentscheidungen. Eine vergleichende Analyse, Operations Research Proceedings 2001 - Selected Papers of the International Conference on Operations Research (OR 2001), Duisburg, September 3-5, 2001. Frankfurt a.M.
13. Forman, E. H.; Selly, M. A. (2002): Decision by Objectives - How to convince others that your are right, New Jersey et al.
14. Garuti, C.; Castro, C. P.; Spencer, I. (2001): Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Application of Risk Prioritation Assessment for Towns under Natural Risks in Aysen Region - Chile, in: Dellmann, K. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Bern.
15. Gerling, P.; Jonen, A. (2006): Kognitionsorientiertes Dienstleistungscontrolling - eine instrumentelle Analyse, Dienstleistungskolloquium am 10.11.2005 an der Technischen Universität Kaiserslautern. Kaiserslautern.
16. Harker, P. T. (1989): The Art and Science of Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, The Analytic Hierarchy Process - Applications and Studies. Berlin et al.
17. Harker, P. T.; Vargas, L. G. (1987): The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process, in: Management Science, Vol. 33, 11, 1383-1403.
18. Helmke, S.; Risse, R. (1999): Chancen- und Risikomanagement im Konzern Deutsche Post AG., in: kostenrechnungspraxis, Vol. 43, 5, 277-283.
19. Hölscher, R. (2002): Von der Versicherung zur integrativen Risikobewältigung: Die Konzeption eines modernen Risikomanagements, in: Hölscher, R.; Elfgen, R. (Eds.) Herausforderung Risikomanagement: Identifikation, Bewertung und Steuerung industrieller Risiken. Wiesbaden.
20. Huang, S.; Chang, I.; Li, S.; Lin, M. (2004): Assessing Risk in ERP Projects - Identify and Prioritize the Factors in: Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104, 8, 681-688.
21. Jonen, A. (2005): Semantische Analyse des Risikobegriffes und Bildung eines Begriffskonzepts für den IT-Dienstleistungsbereich, in: Corsten, H. (Ed.) Schriften zum Produktionsmanagement - Nr. 74: Dienstleistungs-Kolloquium am 21.04.2005 an der Universität Kaiserslautern. Kaiserslautern.
22. Jonen, A. (2008): Kognitionsorientiertes Risikocontrolling, Lohmar.
23. Jonen, A.; Lingnau, V. (2004): Risikohandling - Zuordnung der Funktion und Institution bei der Behandlung von Risiken, in: Banking and Informations Technology, Bd. 5, 3, 21-33.
24. Kinoshita, E. (2005): Why we need AHP/ANP instead of Utility Theory in Today's Complex World - AHP from the Perspective of Bounded Rationality, http://www.superdecisions.com/~saaty/ISAHP2005/Papers/KinoshitaE_AHP&ANPvsUtilityTheory.pdf, Date of information retrieval 2007-04-30.
25. Larichev, O. I. (1992): Cognitive Validity in Design of Decision-Aiding Techniques in: Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 1, 3, 127-138.
26. Larichev, O. I.; Moshkovich, H. M. (1995): ZAPROS-LM - A Method and System for Ordering Multriattributive Alternatives, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 503-521.
27. Lück, W. (2004): Lexikon der Betriebswirtschaft, Wien.
28. Miller, G. A. (1956): The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information, in: The Psychological Review, Vol. 63, 81-97.
29. Moutinho, L. (1993): The Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Goal Setting and Goal Assessment: The Case of Professional Services Companies, in: Journal of Professional Services Marketing, Vol. 8, 2, 97-114.
30. Peterson, C. R.; Beach, L. R. (1967): Man as an Intuitive Statistician, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 68, 1, 29-46.
31. Saaty, T. L. (1977): A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, 3, 234-281.
32. Saaty, T. L. (1987): Risk- Its Priority and Porbability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, in: Risk Analysis, Vol. 7, 2, 159-172.
33. Saaty, T. L. (1989): Group Decision Making and the AHP, The Analytic Hierarchy Process - Applications and Studies. Berlin.
34. Saaty, T. L. (1990): How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, in: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, 1, 9-26.
35. Saaty, T. L. (1994): How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, in: Interfaces, Vol. 24, 6, 19-43.
36. Saaty, T. L. (1996a): The Analytic Hierarchy Process - Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, Pittsburgh.
37. Saaty, T. L. (1996b): Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback - The Analytic Network Process, Pittsburgh.
38. Saaty, T. L. (2001): Deriving the AHP 1-9 Scale from First Principles.
39. Schütt, K.-F. (1981): Wahrscheinlichkeitseinschätzung im Computer-Dialog, Stuttgart.
40. Simon, H. A. (1997): Administrative Behavior - A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, New York.
41. Suh, B.; Han, I. (2003): The IS Risk Analysis based on a Business Model, in: Information & Management, Vol. 41, 2, 149-158.
42. Tversky, A.; Kahnemann, D. (1974): Judgment under Uncertainty, in: Science, Vol. 185, September, 1124-1131.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPZ1-0065-0023