Computer Aided Design of Mechatronic Systems

• Autorzy: Mrozek Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Any successful company must react quickly to changing trends in the market. New products should be designed and manufactured quicker and cheaper than counter partners do. A shorter design time provides a distinct competitive advantage. The paper describes two approaches towards designing interdisciplinary mechatronic systems: the first is visual modelling with the UML, the second is physical modelling with Modelica.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mechatronics; UML; physical modelling; Modelica; Dymola; Simulink; Stateflow

PL

mechatronika; UML; modelowanie fizyczne

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: Vol. 13, no 2
• Strony: 255--267
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Mrozek Z.

• Cracow University of Technology Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering ul. Warszawska 24, 31-521 Cracow, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Astrom K.J, Elmqvist H. and Mattson S.V. (1998): Evolution of continuous-time modelling and simulation. — Proc. 12-th European Simulation Multiconf. ESM’98, Manchester, UK, pp. 9–18.
• [2] Booch G., Rumbaugh J. and Jacobson I. (1999): The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. — Addison Wesley.
• [3] Bowles P., Tiller M., Elmqvist H., Brück D., Mattsson S.E., Möller A., Olsson A. and Otter M. (2001): Feasibility of detailed vehicle modeling. — Proc. SAE World Congress, Detroit, paper No. 01P-321.
• [4] Bruegge B. and Dutoit A. (1999): Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Conquering Complex and Changing Systems. — Prentice-Hall.
• [5] Bunus P., Engelson V. and Fritzson P. (2002): Mechanical Models Translation, Simulation and Visualization in Modelica. —Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 199-208.
• [6] Clauß C. and Beater P. (2002): Multidomain systems: Electronic, hydraulic, and mechanical subsystems of a universal testing machine modelled with modelica. — Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 25–30.
• [7] Douglas B.P. (1998a): Designing Real-time Systems with UML, Part I-III. — Embedded Systems, No. 03-05, available at: http://www.embedded.com.
• [8] Douglas B.P. (1998b): Real-time UML: Developing Efficient Objects for Embedded Systems. — Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
• [9] Dymola (2003): Dynamic Modelling Laboratory. — Available at http://www.dynasim.se/.
• [10] Elmqvist H., Mattsson S.E. and Otter M. (1998): Modelica—the new object-oriented modeling language. — Proc. 12th Europ. Simulation Multiconf. ESM’98, Manchester, UK, pp. I–X.
• [11] Elmqvist H., Mattsson S.E. and Otter M. (2001): Object-oriented and hybrid modeling in modelica. — J. Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 127–131.
• [12] Felgner F., Agustina S., Cladera Bohigas R., Merz R. and Litz L. (2002): Simulation of thermal building behaviour in modelica. — Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, , Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 147–154.
• [13] Ferreira J.A., de Oliveira J.E. Costa, V.A. (1999): Modeling of hydraulic systems for hardware-in-the-loop simulation: A methodology proposal. — Proc. Int. Mechanical Eng. Congress & Exposition, Nashville, USA, Vol. 6, p. 33.
• [14] Gawrysiak M. (2002): Stages of mechatronic design according to R. Isermann. — Proc. Workshop on Mechatronic Design, Cracow, pp. 7–15, (in Polish).
• [15] MATLAB, SIMULINK, STATEFLOW(2003): Real TimeWorkshop. — Available at http://www.mathworks.com/.
• [16] McLaughlin M.J. and Moore A. (1998): Real-time extensions to UML, timing, concurrency, and hardware interfaces. — Dr. Dobb’s J., No. 12, pp. 7–15.
• [17] Modelica®(2003): A unified object-oriented language for physical systems modeling, language specification, version 2.0. —Available at http://www.Modelica.org/.
• [18] Mrozek B. and Mrozek Z. (2001): MATLAB 6, User’s Guide.—Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PLJ, (in Polish).
• [19] Mrozek Z. (2002a): Computer-aided design of mechatronic systems.—Sci. Fasc., Cracow Univ. of Technol., Series: Electrical and Computer Eng., No. 1, (in Polish).
• [20] Mrozek Z. (2002b): Design of the mechatronic system with help of UML diagrams. — Proc. 3-rd Workshop Robot Motion and Control, Bukowy Dworek, Poland, pp. 243–248.
• [21] Mrozek Z. (2002c): Methodology of using UML in mechatronic design. — Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola, No. 1, pp. 25–28, (in Polish).
• [22] Mrozek Z., Mrozek B., Adjei O. (2002): Teaching object oriented software engineering with UML.—Proc. 13-th Ann. Conf. Innovations in Education for Electrical and Information Eng., York, (in English).
• [23] OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification v.1.4, (and other OMG documents), Available at http://www.omg.org, 2003.
• [24] Petko M. (2002): Implementation of control systems in ASIC/FPGA circuits. — Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola, No. 1, pp. 18–21.
• [25] Rational Rose (2003): Rational Rose RT (and other software from Rational Software Corporation), Available at http://www.rational.com/, 2003.
• [26] Real-time Studio (2003): ARTiSAN Software Tools, Inc., Available at http://www.artisansw.com/, 2003.
• [27] Schlegel C., Bross M., Beater P. (2002): HIL-Simulation of the hydraulics and mechanics of an automatic gearbox. — Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 67–76.
• [28] Sinha R., Paredis C.J. and Khosla P.K. (2000): Integration of mechanical CAD and behavioral modeling. — Proc. Int. Workshop Behavioral Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, Florida, pp. 31–36.
• [29] Steinmann W.D. and Zunft S. (2002): A library for modelica applications in technical thermodynamics. — Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 217–224.
• [30] Torrey D.A. and Selamogullari U.S. (2002): Modelica implementation of field-oriented controlled 3-phase induction machine drive. — Proc. 2nd Int. Modelica Conf., DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, pp. 173–182.
• [31] Uhl T. (2002): A system of computer-aided mechatronic design. — Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola, No. 1, pp. 14–17, (in Polish).
• [32] Uhl T., Bojko T., Mrozek Z. and Szwabowski W. (2000): Rapid prototyping of mechatronic systems. — J. Theoret. Appl. Mech., Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 655–668.
• [33] Uhl T., Bojko T., Mrozek Z., Petko M., Szwabowski W., Korendo Z. and Bogacz M. (1999): Selected problems of mechatronic design.—Techn. Report 7T07B 01414, Chair of Robotics and Machine Dynamics, Acad. Mining & Metallurgy, Cracow, (in Polish).
• [34] Uhl T., Mrozek Z. and Petko M. (2000): Rapid control prototyping for flexible arm.—Prepr. 1st IFAC Conf. Mechatronic Systems, Darmstadt, Vol. II, pp. 489–494.
• [35] Uhl T., Bojko T. and Mrozek Z. (1999): Mechatronic approach towards designing and implementing of control systems.— Proc. 1st Workshop Robot Motion and Control, Poznań, Poland, pp. 135–140.
• [36] Uhl T., Bojko T., Mrozek Z. and Szwabowski W. (1998): Control of a flexible robot arm – fast prototyping and implementation. — Proc. 1st Nat. Workshop Rapid Prototyping Methods, Acad. Mining & Metallurgy, Cracow.
• [37] Uhl T. and Śliwa Z. (1996): Selected topics in CAD/CAM systems and their applications. — Cracow Centre for Advanced Training in Information Technology, CCATIE, Cracow.
• [38] UML for Real Time System Design, ISG 1998, available at: http://www.isg.de/people/marc/UmlDocCollection/UMLFrReal-TimeSystemsDesign/umlrt.html/.