Wpływ nanotlenku glinu i nanotlenku glinu modyfikowanego kobaltem na mikroorganizmy

• Autorzy: Mosdorf P. , Karwowska E. , Kunicki R. A. , Karolczak G.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Impact of alumina and cobalt-modified alumina on microorganisms

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Przyczyną zainteresowania nanokompozytami są ich unikatowe właściwości fizyczne i chemiczne oraz rosnąca liczba potencjalnych zastosowań. Wykorzystywane są one w elektronice, ceramice, optyce, technikach laserowych, budownictwie, rolnictwie, medycynie, kosmetyce oraz kosmonautyce. Prowadzone są badania nad zastosowaniem nanomateriałów w nowoczesnych systemach podawania leków, fototerapii czy leczeniu chorób neurodegradacyjnych takich jak choroba Wilsona, Alzhaimera i Parkinsona [2]. Nanocząstki o właściwościach magnetycznych wykorzystywane są w diagnostyce, biologii molekularnej - do etykietowania biomolekuł oraz przy bezpośrednim podawaniu leków do komórek nowotworowych [3], jak również jako środki kontrastowe w rezonansie magnetycznym [1]. Stanowią składniki farb, baterii, środków konserwujących i pielęgnacyjnych, kosmetyków, katalizatorów, materiałów dentystycznych, sorbentów i materiałów ściernych.

EN

The growing interest in nanostructural materials and their common application in various areas of life and industry, results in their increasing emission into the natural environment. Most of the present research on the influence of nanoparticles on living cells is carried out using animal or cultured human cells. However there are few data concerning the impact of nanoproducts on microorganisms isolated from the natural environment. The aim of this work was to determine the influence of alumina nanopowder as well as cobalt-modified alumina nanopowder on bacteria isolated from soil, water and air samples. The growth tests allowed to observe that Co-modified alumina nanopowder revealed the stronger antibacterial activity com-paring with alumina without modification. The strains of soil bacteria were the most sensitive to both tested nanopowders, especially to CoO/Al2O3. The growth of 93% of bacteria isolated from soil samples was inhibited by cobalt-modified alumina nanopowder, but only about 20% - by alumina without modification (mainly gram negative rods from genus Pseudomonas). Bacteria isolated from the air, especially from genus Staphylococcus were the less sensitive to alumina nanoparticles. However some of them were sensitive to cobaltmodified alumina nanopowder. It was noticed that in low concentration of nanoproduct, some adaptation processes, allowing bacteria to grow in a presence of nanopowder may be observed, even in case of cobalt-modified alumina characterized by more significant antibacterial properties. Moreover, the sensitivity to tested preparations was attributed to the particular bacterial strains, that was proved by different results obtained for the various strains of the same bacterial species.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

nanotlenek glinu; kobalt; mikroorganizmy; nanokompozyty

EN

alumina nanoparticles; cobalt; microorganisms

• Wydawca: Politechnika Koszalińska
• Czasopismo: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Tom 13
• Strony: 1635--1651
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Mosdorf P.

autor

Karwowska E.

autor

Kunicki R. A.

autor

Karolczak G.

• Politechnika Warszawska

Bibliografia

• 1. Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G., Golimowski J., Urban P.L.: Nanoparti-cles: Their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management, Waste Manage. 29, 2009
• 2. Yang L., Watts D.J.: Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticle”, Toxicol. Lett. 158, 2005.
• 3. Sahoo S., Parveen S., Panda J.J.: The present and future of nanotechnology in human health care, Clinical Nanomedicine 3, 2007.
• 4. Seshadri S.: The chemistry of nanomaterials: synthesis, properties and aplications, Wiley-Vch Verlag GMBH & Co, 2004.
• 5. Rodríguez J.A., Fernández-García M.: Synthesis, Properties, and Appli-cations of Oxide Nanomaterials, JohnWiley & Sons, Inc. New Jersey, 2008.
• 6. Wagner A., Bleckmann C.A., Murdock R.C., Schrand A.M., Schlager J.J., Hussain S.M.: Cellular Interaction of Different Forms of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages, J. Phys. Chem. B 2007
• 7. Ostrowski A.D., Martin T., Conti J. Hurt I., Harthorn B.H.: Nanotoxi-cology: characterizing the scientific literature 2000–2007, J. N. Res. 2009.
• 8. Konishi Y., Ohno K., Saitoh N., Nomura T., Nagamine S., Hishida H., Takahashi Y., Uruga T.: Bioreductive deposition of platinum nanoparti-cles on the bacterium Shewanella algae, J. Biotechnol. 128, 2007.
• 9. Lyon D.Y., Fortner J.D., Sayes C.M., Colvin V.L., Hughes J.B.: Bacterial cell association and antimicrobial activity of a C-60 water suspension, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24, 2005.
• 10. Neal A.L.: What can be inferred from bacterium–nanoparticles interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nano-particles?, Ecotoxicology 17, 2008.
• 11. Williams D.N., Ehrman S.H., Pulliam-Holoman T.R.: Evaluation of the microbial growth response to inorganic nanoparticles, Journal of Nanobiotechnology 4, 2006.
• 12. Brayner R., Ferrari-Iliou R., Brivois N., Djediat S., Benedetti M.F., Fievet F.: Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium, Nano. Lett. 6, 2006.
• 13. Moore M.N.: Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?, Environ. Int. 32, 2006.
• 14. Handy R.D., Kammer F, Lead J.R., Hassellov M, Owen R., Crane M.: The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles, Ecotoxicology 17, 2008.
• 15. Snopczyński T., Góralczyk K., Czaja K., Stryciński P., Hernik A., Korcz W., Ludwicki J.K.: Nanotechnologia – możliwości i zagrożenia. Rocznik PZH, 2, 2009.