Comparison of polymeric and ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for separation of natural organic matter from water

• Autorzy: Kabsch-Korbutowicz M. , Urbanowska A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The experiments were aimed at removing natural organic matter from water by ultrafiltration process. The water from the Odra River and model solution, being a mixture of dechlorinated tap water and humic water from peat-bog, were tested. 3 types of ceramic membranes with the cut-off values equal to 15, 50 and 300 kDa as well as 6 types of polymeric membranes made of polyethersulphone and regenerated cellulose with the cut-off of 5, 10 and 30 kDa were examined. The results obtained show the significant influence of membrane material on its transport and separation properties. For all the membranes examined, an increase in the cut-off value resulted in the rise in permeate flux. Among the membranes tested the highest permeate flux values were observed for polymeric membranes. The study has demonstrated that polymeric membranes are less prone to fouling. Polymeric membranes have separated natural organic matter particles more effectively compared with ceramic membranes of a similar cut-off. In the case of polymeric membranes, an increase in cut-off brought about a decrease in separation efficiency, while for ceramic membranes this relation was inverse.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ultrafiltration; ultrafiltraion membranes; wastewater treatment; polymeric membranes; ceramic membranes; water treatment

PL

ultrafiltracja; membrany ultrafiltracyjne; oczyszczanie wody; oczyszczanie ścieków; membrany polimerowe; membrany ceramiczne

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Environment Protection Engineering
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 36, nr 1
• Strony: 125--135
• Opis fizyczny: bibliogr. 11 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kabsch-Korbutowicz M.

autor

Urbanowska A.

• Institute of Environmental Protection Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław,

Bibliografia

• [1] Membrane Separation Technologies to 2012, The Freedonia Group Report #FR2307, Pub. 03/2008.
• [2] KOŁTUNIEWICZ A., DRIOLI E., Membranes in Clean Technologies. Theory and Practice, Wiley- VCH, 2008.
• [3] KONIECZNY K., RAJCA M., BODZEK M., GEMBOŁYŚ B., Influence of NOM properties on the fouling of ultrafiltration membranes (in Polish), Ochrona Środowiska, 2008, 30(3), 3–8.
• [4] LOZIER J., CAPPUCCI L., AMY G., LEE N., JACANGELO J., HUANG H., YOUNG T., MYSORE C., EMERAUX C., CLOUET J., CROUE J.-P., HEIJMANN B., Natural Organic Matter Fouling of Low- Pressure Membrane Systems, AwwaRF Report 91208, 15.10.2008.
• [5] Workshop Utilization of NOM Characteristics to Improve Process Selection and Performance, Berlin, 2001, 10–12.
• [6] Inorganic Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization and Application, Mallada R., Menéndez M. (eds.), Elsevier, 2008.
• [7] LI K., Ceramic Membranes for Separation and Reaction, Wiley-VCN, 2007.
• [8] MUELLER U., WITTE M., Ceramic membranes – case related protocol for optimal operational conditions to treat filter backwash, TECHNEAU 2007, 5/02/2007.
• [9] KANAYA S., FUJIURA S., TOMITA T., YONEKAWA H., The World’s Largest Ceramic Membrane Drinking Water Plant, Proc. 2007 AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, 18–21.03.2007, Tampa, Florida, USA.
• [10] YONEKAWA H., OOGINK M., Ceramic membranes: the future for drinking water production? http://www.rwbwaterservices.nl/docs/54/Keramische_membraanfiltratie.pdf
• [11] ELIMELECH M., CHEN W.H., WAYPA J.J., Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer, Desalination, 1994, 95, 269–286.