Reverse logistics inventory model for reusable product parts

• Autorzy: Jodejko-Pietruczuk A. , Plewa M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Until recently logistics systems supported only processes carried out in classical material flow from producer to final user. Recently it has been a remarkable growth of interest in optimizing logistics processes that supports recapturing value from used goods. The process of planning, implementing, and controlling the efficient, cost effective flow of raw materials, in-process inventory, finished goods and related information from the point of consumption to the point of origin for the purpose of recapturing value or proper disposal is called reverse logistics. Reuse of product parts can bring direct advantages to the company because it reduces costs associated with acquiring new components. Main goal of this paper is to create the reverse logistics inventory model that uses the reliability theory to describe re-usability of product parts with assumption that recovered components are used in a production process but they aren't as good as new ones. The model allows to estimate the potential profits of the reusing policy in production and inven-tory management. It gives the base to optimize some of the process parameters: the threshold work time of returns, the warranty period for products containing reused elements or new components order size.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

reverse logistics; reusable product parts; inventory model

PL

modele logistyczne; części produktu wielokrotnego użytku; model inwentaryzacji

• Wydawca: Międzynarodowa Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki i Transportu we Wrocławiu
• Czasopismo: Logistics and Transport
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 14, No. 1
• Strony: 111--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Jodejko-Pietruczuk A.

autor

Plewa M.

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Dobos. I., Richter. K. 2000. The integer EOQ repair and waste disposal model – Further analysis. Central European Journal of Operations Research 8: 173–194.
• [2] Dobos. I. 2002. The generalization of Schrady’s model: a model with repair, Working Paper No. 7, Department of Business Economics, Budapest University of Economics and Public Administration.
• [3] Fleischmann. M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard. J.M., Dekker. R., van der Laan. E., van Nunen. J.A.E.E., van Wassenhove. L.N. 1997. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A reviev. European Journal of Operational Research 103: 1-17.
• [4] Fleischmann. M., Dekker. R., Kuik. R. 2002. Con-trolling inventories with stochastic item returns: A basic model. European Journal of Operational Re-search 138: 63-75.
• [5] Fleischmann. M., Kuik. R. 2003. On optimal inventory control with independent stochastic item re-turns. European Journal of Operational Research 151: 25-37.
• [6] Heyman. D.P. 1997. Optimal disposal policies for a single-item inventory system with return., Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 24: 385-405.
• [7] Inderfurth. K., Simple optimal replenishment and disposal policies for a product recovery system with leadtimes. OR Spektrum 19: 111-122.
• [8] Inderfurth. K., van der Laan. E. 2001. Leadtime effects and policy improvement for stochastic inventory control with remanufacturing., International Journal of Production Economics 71: 381-390.
• [9] Jodejko-Pietruczuk A., Plewa M. (2011). The mod-el of reusability of series system product. Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars, July 03-09, 2011, Gdańsk-Sopot, Poland.
• [10] Kelle. P., Silver. E.A. 1989. Purchasing Policy of New Containers Considering the Random Returns of Previously Issued Container. IIE Transactions 21 (4): 349-354.
• [11] Kiesműller. G.P. 2003. A new approach for control-ling a hybrid stochastic manufacturing/remanufacturing system with inventories and different leadtimes. European Journal of Operational Research 147: 62-71.
• [12] Kleber. R., Minner. S., Kiesműller. G. 2002. A continuous time inventory model for a product recovery system with options. International Journal of Production Economics 79: 121-141.
• [13] Konstantaras. I., Papachristos. S. 2007. Optimal policy and holding cost stability regions in a period-ic review inventory system with manufacturing and remanufacturing options. European Journal of Operational Research 178: 433-448.
• [14] Korugan. A., Gupta. S. M. 1998. A Multi-Echelon Inventory System with Returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering 53 (1-2): 145-148.
• [15] Mabini. M.C., Pintelon. L.M., Gelders. L.F. 1992. EOQ type formulations for controlling repairable inventories. International Journal of Production Economics 28: 21-33.
• [16] Muckstadt. J.A. 1973. A model for a multi-item, multi-echelon, multi-indenture inventory system. Management Science 20 (4): 472-481.
• [17] Muckstadt. J.A., Isaac. M.H. 1981. An analysis of single item inventory systems with returns. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 28: 237-254.
• [18] Murayama T., Shu L. H. (2001). Treatment of Reliability for Reuse and Remanufacture, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Environ-mentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign'01), Tokyo, Japan.
• [19] Murayama T., Yoda M., Eguchi T., Oba F. (2005). Adaptive Production Planning by Information Sharing for Reverse supply Chain, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign'05), Tokyo, Japan.
• [20] Murayama T., Yoda M., Eguchi T.. , (2006). Oba F., Production Planning and Simulation for Reverse Supply Chain, Japan Society Mechanical Engineering International Journal, Series C, Vol. 49, No. 2.
• [21] Plewa M., Jodejko-Pietruczuk A. (2011). The re-verse logistics model of single-component product recovery. European Safety and Reliability Conference, Troyes, France.
• [22] Richter. K. 1994. An EOQ repair and waste disposal model. Proceedings of the Eight International Working Seminar on Production Economics 3: 83-91. Ingls/Innsbruck.
• [23] Richter. K. 1997. Pure and mixed strategies for the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem. OR Spectrum 19: 123–129.
• [24] Richter. K., Sombrutzki. M. 2000. Remanufacturing planning for the reverse Wagrner/Whitin models. European Journal of Operational Research 121 (2): 304-315.
• [25] Richter. K. 1996a. The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers. Europe-an Journal of Operational Research 95: 313–324.
• [26] Richter. K. 1996b. The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model. International Journal of Production Economics 45: 443–447.
• [27] Richter. K., Weber. J. 2001. The reverse Wagner/Whitin model with variable manufacturing and remanufacturing cost. International Journal of Production Economics 71: 447-456.
• [28] Schrady. D.A. 1967. A deterministic inventory model for repairable items. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 14 (3): 391-398.
• [29] Sherbrooke. C.C. 1971. An Evaluator for the Number of Operationally Ready Aircraft in a Multilevel Supply System. Operations Research 19: 618- 635.
• [30] Sherbrooke. C.C. 1968. METRIC: A Multi-echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control. Operations Research 16: 122-141.
• [31] Simpson V.P. 1978. Optimum solution structure for a repairable inventory problem. Operations Rese-arch 26 (2): 270-281.
• [32] Teunter. R.H. 2001. Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory system. Naval Rese-arch Logistics 48: 484–495.
• [33] Van der Laan. E.A., Dekker. R., Salomon. M. 1996. Product remanufacturing and disposal: A numerical comparison of alternative control strategies. Inter-national Journal of Production Economics 45: 489-498.
• [34] Van der Laan. E.A., Dekker. R., Salomon. M., Rid-der. A. 1996. An (S,Q) inventory model with re-manufacturing and disposal. International Journal of Production Economics 46-47: 339-350.
• [35] Van der Laan. E.A., Salomon. M. 1997. Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal. International Journal of Operational Research 102: 264-278.