Niematerialne aspekty przestrzeni miejskiej - o wykorzystaniu GIS w warsztacie urbanisty

• Autorzy: Hanzl M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Hidden aspects of urban space - GIS usage in urban planner training

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł prezentuje ogólne założenia kursu "GIS basics - parametric description of urban space" prowadzonego dla studentów pierwszego roku specjalności Architecture for the Society ofKnowledge, realizowanej na studiach magisterskich kierunku Architektura i Urbanistyka na Wydziale Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej, jak również kilka wybranych prac studenckich wykonanych w ramach tegoż kursu.

EN

The paper presents the assumptions of the course syllabus: "GIS basics: parametric description of the urban space" realised at the "Architecture for the Society of Knowledge" Master of Science degree program at the Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw University of Technology. The research conducted by students covered mapping of different aspects of urban phenomena and their relation with physical city space. A part of exercise covered publishing the results in the form of blogs. The course syllabus assumes preparing students for best practicing the urban planner profession in the conditions of information society as well as providing the best tools for influencing the dominant opinions functioning within a given society (Healey, 1997).

Słowa kluczowe

PL

GIS; mapowanie; mashup; edukacja wyższa; planowanie urbanistyczne; analizy przestrzeni miejskiej

EN

GIS; mapping; mash-up; higher education; urban planning; urban space analyses

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Przestrzennej
• Czasopismo: Roczniki Geomatyki
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: T. 9, z. 3
• Strony: 71--82
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Hanzl M.

• Instytut Architektury i Urbanistyki, Politechnika Łódzka,

Bibliografia

• 1. Amoroso N., 2010: The Exposed City, Mapping the Urban Invisibles, Routledge New York.
• 2. Batty, M. et al., 2001: Visualising the City, Conununicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision Makers. [In:] Brail, RK., Klosterman, RE., (eds.) Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models and Visualization Tools, ESRl Press, Redlands California.
• 3. Batty M., Crooks A., Hudson-Smith A., MiltonR,Anand S., JacksonM., Morley 1,2010: Data mash-ups and the future of mapping, JlSC: Bristol, UK, September 2010. http://wwwjisc.ac.uk/techwatch
• 4. Calabrese F., Ratti C., 2008: Nolli 2.0 or how to rebuild Rome without even asking permission trom the historic preservation authority! [In:] Betsky, A.( ed.): Uneternal City Urbanism beyond Rome, Section of the 11th International Architecture Exhibition, Marsilio Editori.
• 5. Guhathakurta S., 2002: Urban modeling as storytelling: using simulation models as a narrative. [In:] Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2002, vol. 29, 895-9ll.
• 6. Habermas 1, 1987: The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1, Beacon Press.
• 7. Hanzl M., 2002: Virtual City Models as a Tool for Urban Tissue Evaluation In 23rd Urban Data Management Symposium Proceedings, Prague.
• 8. Hanzl M., 2003: Rysunek Planistyczny - Przedmiot Studiów Kierunku Gospodarka Przestrzenna na Uniwersytecie Łódzkim. Roczniki Geomatyki, t. 1 z.l, PTlP, Warszawa, 155-163.
• 9. Hanzl M., 2004: Wykorzystanie oprogramowania Arc ViewGIS 8.3 dla nauczania Rysunku Planistycznego na kierunku Gospodarka Przestrzenna w Uniwersytecie Łódzkim. Roczniki Geomatyki, t. 1, z.l, PTlP Warszawa, 155-163.
• 10. Hanzl M., Wrona S.K., 2004: Visual Simulation as a Tool for Planning Education, Computer Aided Participation Support .[In:] Riidiger Bjame, Toumay Bruno, Orbak Henning (red.), Architecture in the Network Society. Proceedings of the 22th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts School of Architecture, Kopenhaga, 500-507.
• 11. Hanzl M., 2007: Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials. [In:] Design Studies, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Publisher: Elsevier, 289-307.
• 12. Hanzl M. 2009: Potential of the Information Technology for the Public Participation in the Urban Planning. [In:] Joshi PK., Pani P, Mohapatra S.N., Singh T.P (eds.) Geoinformatics for the Natural Resources Management. Nova Science Pubishers, Inc. New York.
• 13. Healey P., 1997: Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, University of British Columbia.
• 14. Kempf P, 2009: You are the City Observation, Organization and Transformation of Urban Settings. Lars Miiller Publishers, Germany.
• 15. Kesteloot Ch., 2000: Brussels: Post-Fordist Polarization in a Fordist Spatial Canvas. [In:] Marcuse P., Kempen R Van: Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order (Studies in Urban and Social Change), WileyBlackwell.
• 16. Lynch K., 1960: The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge Massechussets.
• 17. Manau lL.E., Ortoneda IM., Solano lP, 2005: Squatting Geometries - Guerilla Barcelona. [In:] McGrath, B., Shane, G. (eds.), Sensing the 21st-Century City Close-Up and Remote, 58-63. Architectural Design Vo175 Nov/Dec 2005.
• 18. Mintzberg H., Westley F., 2001: Decision making: it's not what you think MIT Sloan Management Review.
• 19. Mitchell W.J, 1996: City of Bits, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
• 20. Mitchell W.J, 2000: E-topia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
• 21. Mitchell W.J, 2003: Me++, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, London England.
• 22. Mitchell W.J, 2005: Placing Words Symbols, Space and the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, London England.
• 23. Nold Ch. (ed.), 2009: Emotional Cartography, Technologies of the Self.http://emotionalcartography.net!
• 24. Sanoff H., 2000: Conununity Participation Methods in Design and Planning. John Willey and Sons, New York, USA.
• 25. Wrona S.K., 1980: Metody uczestniczenia w projektowaniu w architekturze i urbanistyce. Wydawnictwa Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa.